發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-23 04:46

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 國際 民商事 訴訟 競合 問題 研究　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2007年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化和市場國際化進(jìn)程的加快，跨國民商交往活動(dòng)的頻繁發(fā)生，直接導(dǎo)致了國際民事、商事爭議的大量發(fā)生。由于各國間存在著法律制度的根本差別，各國民商事糾紛的當(dāng)事人出自于自身利益的考慮，加之各國司法制度本身賦予了當(dāng)事人選擇法院的相對自由，導(dǎo)致了國際訴訟競合問題的產(chǎn)生。訴訟競合固然可以為各國當(dāng)事人提供訴訟上的便利，使得當(dāng)事人能夠獲得必要的司法救濟(jì)手段，，但其結(jié)果往往使當(dāng)事人的訴訟請求存在相互矛盾判決的危險(xiǎn)，造成司法資源的浪費(fèi)，增加當(dāng)事人的負(fù)擔(dān)，給國家間相互承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行彼此的判決帶來諸多困難。 本文主要采取比較分析的方法，從司法的視角，全方位地研究了國際民事訴訟當(dāng)中的訴訟競合問題，整篇文章共分七個(gè)章節(jié)。 在第一章中，文章從界定國際訴訟競合的定義入手，對國際訴訟競合所涉問題進(jìn)行整體剖析。劃分了國際訴訟競合的類型，分析了國際訴訟競合產(chǎn)生的社會(huì)基礎(chǔ)和法律因素，指出了其存在的合理因素以及帶來的諸多法律問題。 為了尋求更為合理的解決國際訴訟競合的途徑和辦法，推動(dòng)國際社會(huì)和我國關(guān)于此方面法律制度的調(diào)整。本文在第二章和第三章中，詳細(xì)闡述了國際社會(huì)兩大法系國家，尤其是英、美、日等國家關(guān)于規(guī)制國際訴訟競合的法律制度及司法實(shí)踐，考察分析了現(xiàn)今國際社會(huì)通行的國際條約對國際訴訟競合問題的解決辦法。通過對上述國家的國內(nèi)法和國際條約相關(guān)規(guī)定的評述和分析，指出了相關(guān)國家國內(nèi)法和國際條約相關(guān)規(guī)定的合理性和不足，為尋求解決國際訴訟競合的途徑和辦法作出了理論和司法實(shí)踐的鋪墊。 在第四章和第六章、第七章中，文章對我國關(guān)于規(guī)制國際民事訴訟競合問題的法律規(guī)定、司法實(shí)踐以及與有關(guān)國家簽訂的雙邊國際條約的規(guī)定進(jìn)行了評述。指出了目前我國關(guān)于此方面法律制度規(guī)定上存在的方法單一、過分強(qiáng)調(diào)司法主權(quán)原則等問題。對我國在規(guī)制國際訴訟競合問題的立法選擇上，提出了合理確定國際民事訴訟管轄權(quán)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，堅(jiān)持涉外民事訴訟管轄權(quán)的國際協(xié)調(diào)；確立先受訴法院原則和未決訴訟命令制度；謹(jǐn)慎適用“不方便法院原則”和規(guī)范協(xié)議管轄的立法建議。同時(shí)針對我國“一國四域”存在的區(qū)際平行訴訟的問題，在分析其產(chǎn)生原因的基礎(chǔ)上，針對我國區(qū)際平行訴訟的特點(diǎn)，提出了關(guān)于我國區(qū)際平行訴訟法律規(guī)
[Abstract]:The acceleration of economic globalization and the internationalization of the market, the frequent occurrence of international civil and commercial exchanges, has directly led to a large number of international civil and commercial disputes, because of the fundamental differences in legal systems between countries. The parties to civil and commercial disputes in various countries are out of the consideration of their own interests, and the judicial system of each country itself gives the parties the relative freedom to choose the court. It leads to the emergence of international litigation concurrence. Litigation concurrence can certainly provide the parties in various countries with the convenience of litigation, so that the parties can obtain the necessary means of judicial relief. However, the result often makes the litigant's request exist the danger of contradictory judgment, causes the waste of the judicial resources, increases the burden of the parties, and brings many difficulties to the mutual recognition and execution of each other's judgments between the countries. This article mainly adopts the comparative analysis method, from the judicial angle of view, has studied the international civil action in all directions the question of the lawsuit concurrence, the entire article altogether divides into seven chapters. In the first chapter, the article starts with the definition of international litigation concurrence, analyzes the problems involved in international litigation concurrence as a whole, and divides the types of international litigation concurrence. This paper analyzes the social basis and legal factors of international litigation competition and points out the reasonable factors and legal problems. In order to find a more reasonable way to solve the international litigation competition and promote the international community and China on this aspect of the legal system adjustment. This article in the second and third chapters. The legal system and judicial practice of the two legal systems of the international community, especially the United Kingdom, the United States, Japan and other countries on the regulation of international litigation competition and cooperation are elaborated in detail. Through the review and analysis of the current international treaties in the international community to solve the problem of international litigation concurrence, through the domestic law of the above-mentioned countries and international treaties related provisions of comments and analysis. This paper points out the rationality and deficiency of the relevant national laws and relevant provisions of international treaties, and lays the groundwork for the theoretical and judicial practice of seeking ways and means to solve the competing international litigation. In chapter 4th, chapter 6th, chapter 7th, the article on the regulation of international civil litigation competition of the legal provisions. The judicial practice and the provisions of the bilateral international treaties signed with the countries concerned are reviewed. It is pointed out that the existing methods of the legal system in this respect in our country are single at present. Too much emphasis on the principle of judicial sovereignty and other issues. To our country in the regulation of international litigation competition in the issue of legislative choice, the reasonable determination of international civil jurisdiction standards. To insist on the international coordination of the jurisdiction of civil action concerning foreign affairs; Establishing the principle of the court of first action and the system of pending litigation order; The principle of "inconvenient Court" and the legislative suggestion of regulating the jurisdiction of agreement should be applied prudently. At the same time, aiming at the problem of "one country and four regions" in China, this paper analyzes the causes of the parallel litigation. In view of the characteristics of inter-regional parallel litigation in China, this paper puts forward some legal regulations on inter-regional parallel litigation in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D997.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張妍;論我國法院涉外案件中拒絕管轄的基礎(chǔ)[D];上海交通大學(xué);2008年

2 文柳;內(nèi)地與香港區(qū)際平行訴訟解決機(jī)制初探[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

3 郭楚;國際民商事訴訟競合法律規(guī)制問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2013年

本文編號：1456747