【摘要】：設(shè)立中公司的合同債務(wù)承擔(dān),跟發(fā)起人的利益、公司的利益和債權(quán)人的利益都有著莫大的關(guān)系。這一問題在我國公司法中沒有明確的規(guī)定,法院在處理相關(guān)案件時(shí),莫衷一是,各省高級(jí)人民法院的指導(dǎo)意見也存在很大的分歧�！蹲罡呷嗣穹ㄔ宏P(guān)于適用〈中華人民共和國公司法〉若干問題的規(guī)定(三)》頒布后,一定程度起到了定紛止?fàn)幍淖饔?然而該解釋對(duì)于利益分配仍有不盡人意之處,立法根據(jù)、所采理論也尚有可探討之處。本文旨在從立法論層面對(duì)設(shè)立中公司的合同債務(wù)承擔(dān)這一問題所涉及的相關(guān)原理進(jìn)行重述,并得出相應(yīng)的結(jié)論。同時(shí),比照新出的“公司法司法解釋三”,分析其利弊得失。 本文擬分五個(gè)部分進(jìn)行分析探討。第一部分從案例入題,提出設(shè)立中公司目前在我國存在著性質(zhì)不明、責(zé)任不清的問題。法院在裁判有關(guān)設(shè)立中公司的案件,常采用回避的方式,導(dǎo)致了判決中說理不足,法律邏輯混亂。目前我國的相關(guān)立法和司法都不是非常成熟,所以本文第二部分整理了與設(shè)立中公司合同債務(wù)承擔(dān)相關(guān)的境內(nèi)外立法與實(shí)踐,分析各個(gè)規(guī)范的立法根據(jù)和價(jià)值取向,擬為下文評(píng)議我國規(guī)范提供理論基礎(chǔ)。設(shè)立中公司的合同之債可以分為以設(shè)立中公司名義簽訂的和以發(fā)起人名義簽訂的,本文在三、四兩章分章討論了這一問題。第三章從設(shè)立中公司的界定入手,明確設(shè)立中公司的法律性質(zhì)和法律地位,繼而分析以設(shè)立中公司名義設(shè)立的合同的債務(wù)承擔(dān)問題,第四章則是從發(fā)起人的概念、發(fā)起人與設(shè)立中公司的關(guān)系出發(fā)進(jìn)行了論證。最后一個(gè)部分,歸納了本文的觀點(diǎn),對(duì)采用的重點(diǎn)理論進(jìn)行了重申。?
[Abstract]:The contractual debt commitment of the established company has a great relationship with the interests of the initiator, the company and the creditors. This issue is not clearly stipulated in the company law of our country. When the court deals with the relevant cases, there is no agreement. There are also great differences in the guiding opinions of the higher people's courts in various provinces. [after the promulgation of the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (3) >, to a certain extent, it has played a role in settling disputes and ending disputes. However, the explanation is still unsatisfactory for the distribution of interests, legislative basis and theory can also be explored. The purpose of this paper is to restate the relevant principles involved in the issue of contractual debt commitment of the established company from the perspective of legislation, and draw the corresponding conclusions. At the same time, according to the new interpretation of Company Law, the advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. This paper is divided into five parts. In the first part, the author points out that there are some problems in the establishment of the company in our country, such as unclear nature and unclear responsibility. The court often adopts the way of recusal in adjudicating the cases concerning the establishment of the company, which leads to the lack of reasoning and the confusion of the legal logic in the judgment. At present, the relevant legislation and judicature of our country are not very mature, so the second part of this paper collates the domestic and foreign legislation and practice related to the contractual debt undertaking of the established company, and analyzes the legislative basis and value orientation of the various norms. To provide a theoretical basis for the following comments on China's norms. The contractual debts of a company under establishment can be divided into two parts: those signed in the name of the company and those signed in the name of the initiator. This paper discusses this problem in chapters three and four. The third chapter starts with the definition of the company in the establishment, and clarifies the legal nature and the legal status of the company in the establishment, and then analyzes the debt bearing problem of the contract set up in the name of the company in the establishment. The fourth chapter is the concept of the initiator. The relationship between the sponsor and the established company is demonstrated. The last part, summarized the viewpoint of this article, has carried on the reaffirmation to the adopted key theory.?
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 崔建遠(yuǎn),韓海光;債權(quán)讓與的法律構(gòu)成論[J];法學(xué);2003年07期

2 劉斌斌;;論代理權(quán)濫用和表見代理——以中日民法的基礎(chǔ)理論通過設(shè)例的分析探討其內(nèi)在關(guān)系[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年02期

3 穆昌亮;合同相對(duì)性原則芻議[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

4 梁上上;股份公司發(fā)起人的責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)研究;1997年06期

5 鄭景元;;設(shè)立中公司法律問題研究[J];商事法論集;2007年01期

6 曹順明;設(shè)立中公司法律問題研究[J];政法論壇;2001年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 文偉斌;先公司合同之債承擔(dān)問題研究[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2003年

2 李靜;股份有限公司發(fā)起人民事責(zé)任研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2003年

3 王新東;募集設(shè)立股份公司發(fā)起人的法律地位及民事責(zé)任研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2004年

4 俞金香;公司成立前合同的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2005年

5 饒桂芳;論設(shè)立中公司及其法律責(zé)任[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

6 田紀(jì)華;論設(shè)立中公司的民事責(zé)任及其承擔(dān)[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

7 任淑賢;公司成立前合同的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

8 張納博;發(fā)起人民事責(zé)任研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2008年

9 袁鳳翔;設(shè)立中公司合同效力與責(zé)任問題研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

10 甘璐;設(shè)立中的公司的法律地位研究[D];天津大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2394705