【摘要】：我國(guó)公司歸入權(quán)制度主要規(guī)定在《公司法》第一百四十八條和《證券法》第四十七條中。目前多數(shù)公司都采取所有權(quán)和經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)相分離的管理模式,在這種模式下,公司歸入權(quán)作為公司在董事和高管違反忠實(shí)義務(wù)時(shí)取得救濟(jì)的一項(xiàng)重要手段,它于實(shí)踐中是否能夠達(dá)到充分維護(hù)公司利益的目的,這是我們應(yīng)該加以重視的問(wèn)題。本文主要結(jié)合《公司法》第一百四十八條,通過(guò)分析總結(jié)司法審判中的案例,對(duì)公司歸入權(quán)在實(shí)際運(yùn)用中的狀況進(jìn)行論述,并對(duì)這一問(wèn)題進(jìn)行闡釋,提出幾個(gè)公司歸入權(quán)在適用過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的主要問(wèn)題,并聯(lián)系我國(guó)《公司法》一百四十八條對(duì)公司歸入權(quán)制度的規(guī)定,給出相關(guān)建議。本文首先是緒論,文章主體部分按照“提出問(wèn)題——分析問(wèn)題——解決問(wèn)題”的寫作思路,分成三大章節(jié)來(lái)論述,首先是在分析和歸納案例的基礎(chǔ)上,提出公司歸入權(quán)在適用中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,然后結(jié)合四個(gè)典型案例對(duì)提出的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行具體分析,找出問(wèn)題發(fā)生的原因,最后把我國(guó)公司歸入權(quán)制度和其他相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行比較,試圖借鑒和利用其他救濟(jì)手段來(lái)解決歸入權(quán)在適用過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,并對(duì)如何完善我國(guó)《公司法》第一百四十八條規(guī)定的公司歸入權(quán)制度提出兩點(diǎn)建議。本文認(rèn)為對(duì)于公司歸入權(quán)在司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,在一些特殊情況下可以借鑒不當(dāng)?shù)美贫�、無(wú)因管理制度、損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)制度和利潤(rùn)剝奪請(qǐng)求權(quán)制度來(lái)解決。但是這些制度并不能完全取代公司歸入權(quán),很容易受到條件限制,有局限性,因此還應(yīng)該對(duì)我國(guó)《公司法》一百四十八條出現(xiàn)的法律缺陷進(jìn)行完善。本文建議通過(guò)法律解釋的方式完善歸入權(quán)的適用對(duì)象,同時(shí)平衡當(dāng)事人在公司歸入權(quán)行使過(guò)程中當(dāng)事人雙方的舉證責(zé)任。希望這些建議能成為公司歸入權(quán)在實(shí)踐運(yùn)用中的參考,并且能夠?yàn)榇龠M(jìn)我國(guó)公司歸入權(quán)制度的完善提供支持。
[Abstract]:The system of corporate subsumption in our country is mainly stipulated in Article 148 of Company Law and Article 47 of Securities Law. At present, most companies adopt the management mode of separation of ownership and management right. In this mode, corporate ascription right is regarded as an important means for the company to obtain relief when directors and executives violate the duty of loyalty. Whether it can fully protect the interests of the company in practice is a problem we should pay attention to. In this paper, combined with Article 148 of Company Law, by analyzing and summarizing the cases in judicial trial, this paper discusses the situation of the application of corporate taxing right in practice, and explains this problem. This paper puts forward some main problems in the process of application of corporate taxing rights, and puts forward some relevant suggestions according to the provisions of 148 articles of Company Law of our country on the system of corporate taxing rights. The main part of the article is divided into three chapters according to the thinking of "posing questions-analyzing problems-solving problems", first of all, on the basis of analysis and induction of cases, Put forward the problems that appear in the application of corporate taxing right, then combine four typical cases to carry on the concrete analysis to the question, find out the reason of the problem, and finally compare our country's corporate taxing right system with other related systems. This paper attempts to use other relief means to solve the problems in the application of the right of ascription, and puts forward two suggestions on how to perfect the system of the right of corporate ascription as stipulated in Article 148 of the Company Law of our country. This paper holds that the problems arising in the judicial practice can be solved by the improper enrichment system, the non-cause management system, the damage compensation claim system and the profit deprivation claim system under some special circumstances. However, these systems can not completely replace the right of incorporation of companies. They are easy to be restricted by conditions and have limitations. Therefore, we should perfect the legal defects in Article 148 of Company Law of our country. This paper proposes to perfect the applicable object of the right of ascription by means of legal interpretation and to balance the burden of proof of both parties in the process of exercising the right of corporate ascription. It is hoped that these suggestions can serve as a reference for the practical application of corporate taxing rights and provide support for the improvement of corporate taxing rights system in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王瑞軍,郭云忠;“忠實(shí)義務(wù)”:倫理的選擇與法律的否棄[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(漢文版);2001年05期

2 周利民;論設(shè)立夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)的法律意義[J];湖南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

3 呂鳳英;關(guān)于夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)的法理分析[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期

4 趙曉華,潘鳳煥;控制股東忠實(shí)義務(wù)探析[J];北京市經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

5 王彥明;德國(guó)法上多數(shù)股東的忠實(shí)義務(wù)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2004年06期

6 謝曉;忠實(shí)義務(wù)在法國(guó)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì):契約化?[J];寧夏社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年03期

7 姚鋒;律師在其專家責(zé)任中承擔(dān)的義務(wù)問(wèn)題研究[J];湖南經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

8 李友霞;聶嬰智;;夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)的法理解讀[J];東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年03期

9 袁才榮;;夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)淺析[J];重慶文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

10 黃蕾;俞來(lái)德;;論夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)[J];政治與法律;2007年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 趙銘;;從忠實(shí)義務(wù)方面談婚姻問(wèn)題——以筑路人為視角[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二０一一年第三輯）[C];2011年

2 陳喬飛;;對(duì)夫妻相互忠實(shí)義務(wù)的法律思考[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（2007年第4輯）[C];2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王輝東;論夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

2 李娜;民事代理人的忠實(shí)義務(wù)[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

3 李艷芳;控股股東忠實(shí)義務(wù)研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2007年

4 金鑫;控制股東忠實(shí)義務(wù)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

5 黃海燕;論夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2011年

6 駱忠波;夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)違反的法律救濟(jì)[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2013年

7 田秀平;論我國(guó)夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年

8 劉艷琴;夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)[D];河北大學(xué);2013年

9 祁志杰;我國(guó)夫妻忠實(shí)義務(wù)研究[D];新疆師范大學(xué);2014年

10 李標(biāo)森;營(yíng)業(yè)受托人忠實(shí)義務(wù)的法律規(guī)制[D];寧波大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2306151