本文選題：股東困境 + 股東退出　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：有限責(zé)任公司因其制度的獨(dú)特性與優(yōu)越性,在我國市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)中受到眾多投資者的青睞,然而隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展與公司制度的進(jìn)一步完善,實(shí)踐對(duì)制度提出了新的要求。有限責(zé)任公司進(jìn)來容易退出難的困境愈發(fā)受到關(guān)注,也成為困擾投資者尤其是中小投資者的一大難題。如何實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)退出股東的救濟(jì)是完善我國公司法制、提高投資者積極性促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)繁榮發(fā)展的重要課題。 對(duì)于有限責(zé)任公司股東退出問題的研究近年來受到較多的關(guān)注,但大多從股東退出機(jī)制立法構(gòu)建的角度。新公司法第七十五條對(duì)這一問題有所回應(yīng)但尚不完善,本文主要從有限責(zé)任公司股東退出困境的角度,對(duì)股東退出困難的情形進(jìn)行類型化分析,尋找難以退出的原因,并通過比較外國的相關(guān)立法,從實(shí)體法與程序法兩方面提出救濟(jì)的措施,希望能為我國有限責(zé)任公司股東退出機(jī)制獻(xiàn)言獻(xiàn)策,提高對(duì)中小股東權(quán)益的保護(hù)。 除去導(dǎo)言和結(jié)語部分,文章主要分為三章。 第一章闡述了有限責(zé)任公司股東退出的客觀性和法理依據(jù)。首先界定了本文的研究對(duì)象,對(duì)股東退出的概念予以闡釋,并從實(shí)踐角度分析了股東退出的客觀性基礎(chǔ)。其次,以公司契約理論、公司人合性理論為基礎(chǔ),加以對(duì)公司本質(zhì)和公司法價(jià)值的探求,闡述了股東退出的法理依據(jù)。 第二章通過對(duì)股東退出困境進(jìn)行類型化分析,探求股東退出受阻的真正原因。從有限責(zé)任公司股東退出過程入手,比較現(xiàn)行立法的規(guī)定,尋找每一過程中股東退出受阻的原因,從實(shí)體法和程序法兩個(gè)角度,深入探究股東退出困境中的法律缺失。 第三章通過比較研究,在厘清國外有關(guān)股東退出法律機(jī)制安排的基礎(chǔ)上,從救濟(jì)的角度,結(jié)合我國的實(shí)際情況,研究于我國可行的救濟(jì)措施。我國在股東退出救濟(jì)方面的實(shí)體法已有相關(guān)規(guī)定,但尚不完善,本文在原有制度安排基礎(chǔ)上提出些許建議。在程序法方面,我國的規(guī)定較少,本文借鑒外國的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出構(gòu)建并完善程序法律救濟(jì)的相關(guān)措施,并提出引進(jìn)仲裁救濟(jì)等新方式。
[Abstract]:Due to the uniqueness and superiority of its system, the limited liability company is favored by many investors in the market economy of our country. However, with the development of the economy and the further improvement of the company system, the practice has put forward new demands on the system. In particular, it is a big problem for small and medium investors. How to realize the relief to the withdrawal of the shareholders is an important issue to improve the legal system of our company and to improve the enthusiasm of the investors to promote the economic prosperity and development.
The research on the withdrawal of shareholders from the limited liability company has attracted more attention in recent years, but mostly from the angle of the legislative construction of the shareholder exit mechanism. The seventy-fifth article of the new company law has responded to the problem but is not perfect. This article mainly from the angle of the shareholders withdraw from the plight of the limited liability company, to the situation that the shareholders withdraw from the difficult situation. In order to find out the reasons why it is difficult to quit, and by comparing the relevant foreign legislation, we put forward the relief measures from the two aspects of the substantive law and the procedural law, hoping to offer some suggestions for the withdrawal mechanism of the shareholders of the limited liability company in our country and improve the protection of the rights and interests of the small and medium shareholders.
Except for the introduction and epilogue, the article is divided into three chapters.
The first chapter expounds the objectivity and legal basis of the withdrawal of the shareholders of a limited liability company. First, it defines the object of this study, interprets the concept of shareholder withdrawal, and analyzes the objectivity basis of the withdrawal of shareholders from the practical point of view. Secondly, based on the theory of company contract and the theory of company human compatibility, the essence of the company and the company are on the basis of the company. The exploration of legal value explains the legal basis for the withdrawal of shareholders.
The second chapter, through a typed analysis of the plight of shareholders' exit, explores the real reasons for the withdrawal of shareholders. Starting with the process of withdrawing from the shareholders of the limited liability company, this paper compares the regulations of the current legislation to find out the reasons for the withdrawal of the shareholders in each process. From the two angles of the substantive law and the procedural law, the law of the shareholders' withdrawal from the dilemma is deeply explored. Law is missing.
The third chapter, through a comparative study, studies the feasible relief measures in China on the basis of foreign shareholders' withdrawal of legal mechanism from the perspective of relief and the actual situation of our country. The substantive law on the withdrawal of shareholders in our country has some relevant provisions, but it is not yet perfect. This article is put forward on the basis of the original system arrangement. Some suggestions are made. In the field of procedural law, the regulations of our country are few. In this paper, we draw lessons from foreign legislative experience, put forward relevant measures to build and perfect the legal relief of procedural law, and put forward a new way of introducing arbitration relief.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張葉娟;我國有限責(zé)任公司股東退股制度研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1789369