本文選題：司法解散 + 公司僵局　； 參考：《華東政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：公司司法解散制度作為公司的一種退出機制,是解決公司僵局和公司壓迫問題的有效途徑,對保護公司的股東、債權(quán)人及利益相關(guān)人都有著非常重要的意義。但遺憾的是,這一重要制度在1993年的《公司法》中并沒有提及,這一缺陷讓不少中小股東身陷困境。2006年實施的新《公司法》引進了這一制度,為解決公司的僵局問題提供了法律依據(jù),但由于該規(guī)定過于籠統(tǒng)而缺乏可操作性,不能滿足日益增多的司法解散訴訟。后來的《公司法司法解釋二》對此又進行了補充性規(guī)定。但是,與國外發(fā)達國家成熟的司法解散制度相比,我們處在起步階段,很多問題有待理論界和實務界的摸索、完善。本文通過比較分析國外先進的制度設(shè)計和實踐經(jīng)驗,找出我國司法解散制度在立法和實踐中存在的缺陷,并對今后如何在立法中不斷完善,進行初步的探索。本文分為五章,第一章:公司司法解散制度的基本理論,本章主要介紹了公司司法解散的概念及分類、司法解散制度的法理基礎(chǔ)、司法解散制度本身的缺陷。該部分是全文的基礎(chǔ)部分,為下文展開論述奠定了理論基石。第二章:司法解散制度存在的必要性,該章主要通過對公司僵局、公司壓迫的介紹,闡明了建立司法解散制度的現(xiàn)實意義和存在的價值。第三章:我國公司司法解散制度的現(xiàn)狀及缺陷,這一章主要介紹了我國司法解散制度的歷史沿革,并通過比較分析的方法,指出了這一制度在程序法和實體法上兩個方面的缺陷和不足。第四章:域外公司司法解散制度的歷史淵源和研究成果,這章通過介紹英、美、德、日等國的司法解散制度,為完善我國的司法解散制度提供借鑒的模本。第五章:我國公司司法解散制度的探索和完善,這一章針對第三章所指出的我國的司法解散制度中存在的問題,提出若干種完善制度的意見和建議,由于司法解散制度的極大破壞性,使我們在適用這一制度時,應該持謹慎態(tài)度,盡量采用替代性救濟措施,該部分就著重探討了在現(xiàn)有的公司司法解散制度下,引進強制股權(quán)回購制度這種替代性救濟措施的可行性。
[Abstract]:As an exit mechanism of the company, the judicial dissolution system is an effective way to solve the problems of corporate deadlock and corporate oppression. It is of great significance to protect the shareholders, creditors and stakeholders of the company.However, unfortunately, this important system was not mentioned in the Company Law of 1993, which caused many minority shareholders to get into trouble. The new Company Law implemented in 2006 introduced this system.It provides the legal basis for solving the deadlock problem of the company, but because this provision is too general and lack of maneuverability, it can not satisfy the increasing judicial dissolution litigation.Later, the Company Law Judicial interpretation II made supplementary provisions to this.However, compared with the mature judicial dissolution system in foreign developed countries, we are in the initial stage, and many problems need to be explored and perfected by the theoretical and practical circles.By comparing and analyzing the advanced institutional design and practical experience of foreign countries, this paper finds out the defects in the legislation and practice of the judicial dissolution system in our country, and makes a preliminary exploration on how to improve the system in the future.This paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter: the basic theory of corporate judicial dissolution system, this chapter mainly introduces the concept and classification of judicial dissolution of companies, the legal basis of judicial dissolution system, and the defects of judicial dissolution system itself.This part is the basic part of the full text, which lays the theoretical foundation for the following discussion.The second chapter: the necessity of the judicial dissolution system. This chapter expounds the practical significance and the value of the judicial dissolution system through the introduction of corporate deadlock and corporate oppression.Chapter three: the present situation and defects of the judicial dissolution system of our country. This chapter mainly introduces the historical evolution of the judicial dissolution system of our country, and through the method of comparative analysis,The defects and deficiencies of this system in both procedural law and substantive law are pointed out.Chapter four: the historical origin and research results of the judicial dissolution system of foreign companies. This chapter introduces the judicial dissolution system of Britain, the United States, Germany and Japan, and provides a model for improving the judicial dissolution system of our country.Chapter five: the exploration and perfection of the judicial dissolution system of our country, this chapter puts forward some opinions and suggestions to perfect the system in view of the problems existing in the judicial dissolution system of our country pointed out in the third chapter.Due to the devastating nature of the judicial dissolution system, we should be cautious in applying this system and use alternative relief measures as far as possible. This part focuses on the existing corporate judicial dissolution system.Introduction of mandatory share buyback system this alternative relief measures feasibility.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 石曉莉;王旭剛;;論公司司法解散制度的完善[J];四川師范大學學報(社會科學版);2007年03期

2 甘培忠;公司司法解散:《公司法》中說不出的痛[J];中國律師;2002年09期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條

1 李波;論我國的公司司法解散制度[D];中國政法大學;2011年

2 錢佳妹;公司司法解散制度中的程序問題研究[D];華東政法大學;2009年

3 蔣慧;公司司法解散制度淺析[D];復旦大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1755011