本文關(guān)鍵詞： 司法解散 公司僵局 股東濫權(quán) 法律完善　出處：《復旦大學》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 自19世紀中葉英國法院頒布“公正合理清盤令”開始,公司司法解散制度在西方已有150余年的歷史,發(fā)揮著消餌公司內(nèi)部糾紛、化解公司僵局和保護中小股東利益的重要作用。我國新《公司法》第183條明確規(guī)定了法院可判令公司解散,這是我國第一次以法律形式規(guī)定司法解散制度,此規(guī)定對公司實務也將產(chǎn)生重大的影響。但是,由于我國公司司法解散制度剛剛建立,條文規(guī)定過于原則概括,相關(guān)的司法解釋尚未出臺,且無相關(guān)程序與實體的配套規(guī)定,人民法院在審理有關(guān)公司司法解散案件時認定尺度不一,審理方式也五花八門。如何在司法實踐中明確具體的操作規(guī)程,完善公司司法解散制度的研究顯得十分迫切和重要。本文從公司司法解散的法理基礎(chǔ)及立法價值出發(fā),并在借鑒其他國家或地區(qū)立法經(jīng)驗的基礎(chǔ)上同時結(jié)合我國實際,提出完善我國公司司法解散制度的設(shè)想。 本文包括引言、正文和結(jié)語三部分,其中正文分四章: 第一章主要介紹了公司司法解散制度的基本理論。第一節(jié)對司法解散制度進行了簡要概述,并由“公正合理清盤令”講起,介紹了司法解散制度的淵源;第二節(jié)從“公司契約論”、“期待利益落空理論”、“資本多數(shù)決的異化與矯正”以及“公司自治與司法干預的平衡”這幾個角度介紹了司法解散制度的理論依據(jù);公司僵局與股東濫權(quán)為導致司法解散的主要原因,第三節(jié)對此作了詳細分析;同時在第四節(jié)中,司法解散制度的立法價值和意義也得到深入闡述。 第二章的主要內(nèi)容為司法解散制度在兩大法系中的發(fā)展狀況。第一節(jié)介紹了司法解散制度在英美法系國家的發(fā)展狀況;第二節(jié)則介紹了司法解散制度在幾個典型的大陸法系國家或地區(qū),如德國、日本以及中國臺灣地區(qū)的法律規(guī)定及實踐狀況;第三節(jié)對兩大法系中關(guān)于司法解散制度的法律規(guī)定進行了比較分析。 第三章的內(nèi)容主要介紹了司法解散制度在我國的發(fā)展情況。第一節(jié)簡單介紹了一下新修訂的《公司法》中有關(guān)司法解散制度的規(guī)定及適用條件;第二節(jié)從實體和程序諸多方面分析了我國司法解散制度目前存在的不足;第三節(jié)則結(jié)合實際,提出了完善司法解散制度的迫切性與必要性。 第四章主要提出了完善公司司法解散制度的一些構(gòu)想。第一節(jié)介紹了完善我國司法解散制度必須堅持的幾個原則;第二節(jié)則從程序和實體等各方面提出了完善司法解散制度的幾大構(gòu)想,包括了諸如明確訴權(quán)及司法裁判權(quán)、擴充并明確法定事由、設(shè)立前置程序等幾項措施。
[Abstract]:Since the middle of 19th century, when the British court issued the "just and reasonable winding-up order", the judicial dissolution system of the company has a history of more than 150 years in the West. The article 183 of the New Company Law of China clearly stipulates that the court may order the dissolution of the company, which is the first time that the judicial dissolution system is stipulated in the form of law in our country. However, due to the establishment of the judicial dissolution system of the company in our country, the provisions are too general in principle, the relevant judicial interpretation has not yet been issued, and there are no supporting provisions for the relevant procedures and entities. When people's courts try cases of judicial dissolution of a company concerned, they have different standards of determination, and there are also various ways to try them. How to clarify the specific operating procedures in judicial practice? It is very urgent and important to improve the system of judicial dissolution of companies. This paper starts from the legal basis and legislative value of judicial dissolution of companies, and combines the reality of our country with the legislative experience of other countries or regions. Put forward the idea of perfecting the judicial dissolution system of the company in our country. This paper includes three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into four chapters:. The first chapter mainly introduces the basic theory of the judicial dissolution system of the company. The first section gives a brief overview of the judicial dissolution system, and from the "just and reasonable liquidation order", it introduces the origin of the judicial dissolution system; The second section introduces the theoretical basis of judicial dissolution system from the angles of "company contract theory", "the theory of the collapse of expected interests", "the alienation and correction of capital majority decision" and "the balance between corporate autonomy and judicial intervention". Corporate deadlock and shareholder abuse are the main causes of judicial dissolution, the third section makes a detailed analysis of this; at the same time, in Section 4th, the legislative value and significance of judicial dissolution system are also elaborated. The second chapter is mainly about the development of judicial dissolution system in the two legal systems. The first section introduces the development of judicial dissolution system in Anglo-American law countries. The second section introduces the system of judicial dissolution in several typical civil law countries or regions, such as Germany, Japan and Taiwan, China's legal provisions and practice; The third section makes a comparative analysis on the legal provisions of judicial dissolution system in the two legal systems. The third chapter mainly introduces the development of judicial dissolution system in China. The first section briefly introduces the provisions and applicable conditions of judicial dissolution system in the newly revised Company Law. The second section analyzes the deficiency of judicial dissolution system in our country from many aspects of substance and procedure, and the third section puts forward the urgency and necessity of perfecting judicial dissolution system. Chapter 4th mainly puts forward some ideas to perfect the system of judicial dissolution of company. The first section introduces several principles that must be adhered to in order to perfect the system of judicial dissolution in our country. The second section puts forward several ideas to perfect the system of judicial dissolution from the aspects of procedure and entity, including such measures as clarifying the right of action and judicial adjudication, expanding and clarifying the legal reasons, setting up the pre-procedure and so on.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 余t，

本文編號：1531801