本文關(guān)鍵詞： 資本規(guī)制 資本約束 美國公司法 比較法　出處：《中國法學(xué)》2009年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：我國學(xué)者常常將美國公司法上的資本制度稱之為授權(quán)資本制,并將其與大陸法相對,作為物種多元的樣本,同時也作為比較法研究的時候,進行理論折中的一端。本文從進化的角度揭示出,在其他國家歷史上也存在著和我國、大陸國家類似的法定資本制度,但隨著社會生活的發(fā)展和法律規(guī)制技術(shù),乃至于法律理論和理念的變化,這些僵化而無效的制度被不斷的揚棄,而代之以寬松的資本規(guī)制+趨嚴(yán)的誠信義務(wù)(fidu-ciaryduty)的方式。具體表現(xiàn)為:(1)從政府通過法律強行性規(guī)范直接限制,進化到股東、公司、董事和債權(quán)人之間的相互制約;(2)從注重公司資本的起點,進化到以破產(chǎn)為核心標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來進行規(guī)制;(3)從公司和股東之間的不當(dāng)交易及其方式的事前限制,進化到對誠信義務(wù)的事后責(zé)任分配。
[Abstract]:Chinese scholars often refer to the capital system in American company law as authorized capital system, and regard it as a sample of diversity of species, and also as a comparative law research. From the angle of evolution, this paper reveals that in the history of other countries, there are legal capital systems similar to those of China and mainland countries, but with the development of social life and legal regulation technology, Even with the changes in legal theories and concepts, these rigid and ineffective systems have been constantly abandoned, Instead, in the form of looser capital regulations and tighter credit obligations, the specific manifestation of this approach is: 1) from the government's direct restriction by law to the development of shareholders, companies, The mutual restriction between directors and creditors is from the starting point of focusing on the capital of the company to the regulation of bankruptcy as the core standard) from the improper transaction between the company and the shareholders and the prior restriction of the way. Evolution to the duty of good faith after the distribution of responsibility.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：華東政法學(xué)院國際法律與比較法研究中心的“公司資本約束軟化價值取向比較研究”研究課題的一部分
【分類號】：D912.29
，

本文編號：1528695