本文關(guān)鍵詞： 最低注冊(cè)資本限額 債權(quán)人保護(hù) 公司信用　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：最低注冊(cè)資本限額是公司法對(duì)注冊(cè)資本數(shù)額的最低要求,是股東在成立公司時(shí)認(rèn)繳的資本總數(shù)必須達(dá)到的底線數(shù)額,否則公司就不能成立。其作為法定資本制的特征之一,是資本確定性的要求,其設(shè)立之初衷也是為了保護(hù)債權(quán)人的利益和維護(hù)交易安全。隨著公司法理論研究的深入與經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,其對(duì)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不適應(yīng)性也逐漸體現(xiàn),在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的形勢(shì)下,為促進(jìn)資金流動(dòng)與提升公司市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力而進(jìn)行改革具有正當(dāng)性。但縱觀最低注冊(cè)資本限額的發(fā)展歷程,對(duì)其改革是一個(gè)階梯式、循序漸進(jìn)的過程,是在綜合考慮各項(xiàng)因素的情形下做出符合當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展形式的最優(yōu)選擇,在目前我國(guó)尚不具備完善而強(qiáng)大的社會(huì)信用擔(dān)保體系來確保最低注冊(cè)資本額廢除后對(duì)交易風(fēng)險(xiǎn)規(guī)制的情形下,取消最低注冊(cè)資本限額的要求則趨于冒進(jìn)化。該舉措突出了企業(yè)自治性,但也擴(kuò)大了債權(quán)人的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。本文主要研究公司注冊(cè)資本限額取消與債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)的問題。通過從注冊(cè)資本最低限額的概念、由來以及發(fā)展歷程入手,對(duì)本次改革的正當(dāng)性和冒進(jìn)化進(jìn)行分析,探討改革對(duì)債權(quán)人保護(hù)帶來的影響以及現(xiàn)有制度對(duì)債權(quán)人保護(hù)的不足,再結(jié)合國(guó)外取消注冊(cè)資本限額的要求后對(duì)債權(quán)人保護(hù)的相關(guān)制度規(guī)定,提出我國(guó)在債權(quán)人保護(hù)措施方面的完善建議,在對(duì)市場(chǎng)入口完全敞開的情形下,嚴(yán)格企業(yè)設(shè)立后運(yùn)營(yíng)過程中的監(jiān)管,完善社會(huì)信用保障機(jī)制以及企業(yè)信息披露的體系化建設(shè),并可允許以介入公司治理、強(qiáng)化對(duì)相關(guān)人員的責(zé)任追究等賦予債權(quán)人多元化的自救手段。同時(shí),拓展現(xiàn)有公司人格否認(rèn)制度的適用情形,細(xì)化“資本顯著不足”時(shí)公司人格否認(rèn)適用以及借鑒引入“衡平居次”原則,以完善債權(quán)人保護(hù)制度,平衡改革后交易風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的擴(kuò)大對(duì)債權(quán)人保護(hù)的不公。
[Abstract]:The minimum registered capital limit is the minimum requirement for the amount of registered capital in company law. It is the bottom line amount of the total capital subscribed by shareholders when the company is founded, otherwise the company cannot be established. As one of the characteristics of the statutory capital system, the minimum registered capital limit is one of the characteristics of the legal capital system. It is the requirement of capital certainty and its original intention is to protect the interests of creditors and safeguard the security of transactions. With the development of the theory of company law and the development of economy, its inadaptability to market economy is gradually reflected. Under the situation of economic globalization, it is legitimate to reform in order to promote the capital flow and enhance the market competitiveness of the company. However, looking at the development course of the minimum registered capital limit, the reform is a step by step and step by step process. Is to make an optimal choice that is in line with the current economic development form, taking into account all factors, At present, our country does not have a perfect and powerful social credit guarantee system to ensure the transaction risk regulation after the minimum registered capital is abolished. The requirement to eliminate the minimum registered capital limit is tending to evolve. The move highlights corporate autonomy. But it also expands the risk of creditors. This paper mainly studies the problem of the cancellation of registered capital limit and the protection of creditors' interests. This paper analyzes the legitimacy and evolution of the reform, discusses the impact of the reform on the protection of creditors and the inadequacy of the existing system in the protection of creditors. Combined with the relevant regulations on creditor protection after cancelling the requirement of registered capital limit abroad, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of creditor protection measures in our country, under the condition that the market entrance is completely open. Strict supervision in the course of operation after the establishment of an enterprise, perfection of the social credit guarantee mechanism and systematic construction of enterprise information disclosure, and allowing for intervention in corporate governance, Strengthening the accountability of relevant personnel and giving creditors diversified means of self-help. At the same time, to expand the application of the existing corporate personality denial system, In order to perfect the creditor protection system and to balance the unfair protection of creditors with the expansion of transaction risk after the reform, the company's personality denial is applicable and the principle of "equal residence" is introduced in order to perfect the creditor protection system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 劉璐;公司債權(quán)人保護(hù)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

2 鄭雪玉;論我國(guó)最低注冊(cè)資本制的廢除[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

3 王一涵;我國(guó)公司資本制度及其完善研究[D];吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

4 沈偉;論公司債權(quán)人利益的法律保護(hù)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1526854