【摘要】：委托調(diào)解制度是一種非訟化糾紛解決機制,對于緩解法院訴訟壓力,降低當事人糾紛解決成本具有重要意義。但是由于立法的缺失,委托調(diào)解經(jīng)驗的不足,實踐中存在諸多制約委托調(diào)解發(fā)展的因素,所以有必要對委托調(diào)解制度進行研究,以為該制度完善提供理論支持。 本文主要從以下幾個方面對委托調(diào)解制度進行了探討： 第一部分主要分析委托調(diào)解的基本理論,對委托調(diào)解的概念,特征進行了介紹,再將委托調(diào)解與訴訟調(diào)解,人民調(diào)解進行比較,以期更好地對委托調(diào)解進行定性,同時也介紹了委托調(diào)解的功能,從而能夠明確發(fā)展委托調(diào)解的現(xiàn)實意義。 第二部分主要是對法國的法院調(diào)解制度、日本的法院調(diào)停制度、美國附設(shè)在法院的調(diào)解、加拿大的法院調(diào)解制度和我國臺灣地區(qū)的法院附設(shè)調(diào)解分別進行了考察,以期對我國委托調(diào)解制度的完善有所啟示。 第三部分主要是對我國委托調(diào)解的立法現(xiàn)狀和實踐模式進行了考察,同時也對當前委托調(diào)解存在的問題進行了歸納和分析,以期了解當前我國委托調(diào)解制度的整體現(xiàn)狀,從而可以有針對性地進行改進和完善。 第四部分主要是針對我國委托調(diào)解立法和實踐中存在的問題,分別從提高立法層面、規(guī)范委托調(diào)解的主體、界定委托調(diào)解案件的范圍和完善委托調(diào)解的程序等方面提出了完善我國委托調(diào)解制度的意見,以期對我國委托調(diào)解制度的發(fā)展有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The entrustment mediation system is a kind of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism, which is of great significance to alleviate the pressure of court litigation and reduce the cost of dispute resolution between the parties. However, due to the lack of legislation and the lack of experience of entrusted mediation, there are many factors restricting the development of entrusted mediation in practice, so it is necessary to study the entrusted mediation system in order to provide theoretical support for the perfection of the system. This paper mainly discusses the entrustment mediation system from the following aspects: the first part mainly analyzes the basic theory of entrustment mediation, introduces the concept and characteristics of entrusted mediation, and then compares the entrusted mediation with litigation mediation and people mediation, in order to better characterize the entrustment mediation, and also introduces the function of entrustment mediation, so as to be able to clearly develop the practical significance of entrusted mediation. The second part mainly investigates the court mediation system in France, the court mediation system in Japan, the court mediation system attached to the court in the United States, the court mediation system in Canada and the court attached mediation in Taiwan, respectively, in order to enlighten the perfection of the entrustment mediation system in our country. The third part mainly investigates the legislative status and practical mode of entrustment mediation in our country, and also sums up and analyzes the problems existing in entrustment mediation at present, in order to understand the overall situation of entrustment mediation system in our country, so as to improve and perfect it pertinently. The fourth part mainly aims at the problems existing in the legislation and practice of entrustment mediation in our country, and puts forward some suggestions on perfecting the entrusted mediation system in our country from the aspects of improving legislation, standardizing the main body of entrusted mediation, defining the scope of entrusted mediation cases and perfecting the procedure of entrustment mediation, so as to be beneficial to the development of entrustment mediation system in our country.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D925.1;D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 唐東楚;何文燕;;論法院委托調(diào)解[J];重慶大學學報(社會科學版);2010年05期

2 葛玉賓;;民事調(diào)解制度存在的問題及其改革與完善[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年06期

3 高洪賓;加拿大法院調(diào)解制度的啟示[J];法律適用;2005年02期

4 李浩;;委托調(diào)解若干問題研究——對四個基層人民法院委托調(diào)解的初步考察[J];法商研究;2008年01期

5 閆慶霞;;人民調(diào)解前置制度之反思——以民事程序選擇權(quán)為討論的出發(fā)點[J];法學家;2007年03期

6 章武生;司法ADR之研究[J];法學評論;2003年02期

7 趙鋼,王杏飛;我國法院調(diào)解制度的新發(fā)展——對《關(guān)于人民法院民事調(diào)解工作若干問題的規(guī)定》的初步解讀[J];法學評論;2005年06期

8 肖建國;;司法ADR建構(gòu)中的委托調(diào)解制度研究——以中國法院的當代實踐為中心[J];法學評論;2009年03期

9 章武生;;司法ADR與我國法院調(diào)解制度的新發(fā)展[J];公民與法(法學版);2009年05期

10 章武生;;我國法院調(diào)解制度的發(fā)展與規(guī)范[J];公民與法(法學);2010年12期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條

1 欒義娟;論和諧社會背景下委托調(diào)解制度的構(gòu)建[D];華中師范大學;2011年

2 劉妍;委托調(diào)解制度研究[D];華中師范大學;2011年

3 張晨;委托調(diào)解制度研究[D];鄭州大學;2011年

4 汪彩霞;委托調(diào)解研究[D];南昌大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2511267