發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-10 19:45

【摘要】：我國《刑事訴訟法》第十八條規(guī)定：“貪污賄賂犯罪，……，由人民檢察院立案偵查�！彪S著社會的全面快速發(fā)展變化，檢察院查辦貪污賄賂犯罪的難度也與日俱增，在這種情況下，有必要對以往的實(shí)踐工作進(jìn)行一定的調(diào)查統(tǒng)計(jì)、分析研究，，為日后的工作提供參考與啟發(fā)。 本文除了引言與后記外，分為六個(gè)部分，分別為：一、該院“貪污賄賂”類犯罪案件查辦的總體情況，二、案源情況的調(diào)查分析，三、強(qiáng)制措施適用情況的調(diào)查分析，四、偵查手段使用的情況及偵查工作可以加強(qiáng)的地方，五、辦案時(shí)間長度的調(diào)查分析，六、起訴、判決情況的調(diào)查分析。筆者從一個(gè)區(qū)級檢察院2006-2011年的貪污賄賂類案件及其查辦的總體情況和幾個(gè)重點(diǎn)方面入手，進(jìn)行調(diào)查統(tǒng)計(jì)、分析研究。發(fā)現(xiàn)該院貪污賄賂案件查辦中的一些特點(diǎn)與規(guī)律，甚至是不足之處：1、查處案件的罪名集中在貪污罪、受賄罪，對“行賄類犯罪”有較大的“容忍度”，對私分國有資產(chǎn)罪、巨額財(cái)產(chǎn)來源不明等其他罪名查處極少甚至為零；2、案件主要涉及政府機(jī)關(guān)、事業(yè)單位“對外經(jīng)濟(jì)往來領(lǐng)域”（主要是“采購”）和“房屋拆遷、土地征用補(bǔ)償領(lǐng)域”，另外“社會保險(xiǎn)辦理領(lǐng)域”案件也值得引起重視；3、窩案串案查處力度較大，效果明顯；4、案源“自立”有待提高，對紀(jì)委頗為倚重，紀(jì)委以外其他部門單位移送線索很少；5、強(qiáng)制措施方面，適用取保候?qū)彵壤^高，強(qiáng)制措施變更較多，取保候?qū)彙皥?zhí)行”不到位；6、偵查手段可以應(yīng)付當(dāng)前工作，但創(chuàng)新與力度不足；7、案件辦理平均時(shí)長為4.94個(gè)月，超出了2個(gè)月的基本辦案時(shí)限，有“常態(tài)與例外相倒置之嫌”8、起訴不充分和判決輕刑化客觀存在，有必要予以修正。 關(guān)于上述特點(diǎn)、規(guī)律或不足之處，筆者對其原因進(jìn)行了分析，發(fā)現(xiàn)其中有社會、經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的地域性因素的影響，有檢察院反貪局自身的原因，也有體制上、刑事司法發(fā)展歷史傳統(tǒng)上的原因等等。對于一些地域性的特點(diǎn)，查辦案件中不足之處，筆者也提出了自己的看法與應(yīng)對方法，如加強(qiáng)發(fā)案高危領(lǐng)域的犯罪預(yù)防、抓基層與建立情報(bào)信息體制以擴(kuò)大案源、以績效考核促進(jìn)取保候?qū)徲行?zhí)行等等。此外，筆者對特別重要的“偵查工作可以加強(qiáng)的地方”和“修正起訴不充分和判決輕刑化”兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)分析和闡述。
[Abstract]:Article 18 of our country's Criminal procedure Law stipulates: "the crime of embezzlement and bribery (,.,) shall be investigated by the people's Procuratorate." With the rapid development and change of society, it is becoming increasingly difficult for the procuratorate to investigate the crime of corruption and bribery. Under such circumstances, it is necessary to conduct certain investigations, statistics, analysis and research on the past practical work. To provide reference and inspiration for future work. In addition to the introduction and postscript, this article is divided into six parts: first, the general situation of the investigation and handling of the "corruption and bribery" crime cases in the hospital; second, the investigation and analysis of the source of the case; third, the investigation and analysis of the application of coercive measures; and (4) the investigation and analysis of the application of coercive measures. The situation of the use of investigative techniques and the places where the investigation work can be strengthened, five, the investigation and analysis of the length of the case handling time, the sixth, the investigation and analysis of the situation of prosecution and judgment. Starting with the general situation and several key points of corruption and bribery cases investigated and handled by a district procuratorate from 2006 to 2011, the author conducts investigation and statistics, and analyzes and studies them. It is found that some characteristics and laws in the investigation of corruption and bribery cases in the hospital, and even shortcomings: 1. The charges of investigating and punishing the cases are concentrated on the crime of corruption, the crime of accepting bribes, the greater "tolerance" to "bribery crimes", and the crime of private division of state assets. Large amounts of property from unknown sources of other charges are rarely or even zero; (2) the cases mainly involve government agencies, institutions "foreign economic exchanges" (mainly "procurement") and "house demolition, land requisition and compensation field", in addition, "social insurance management field" cases are also worthy of attention; (3) the investigation and treatment of the wo case is strong and the effect is obvious; (4) the source of the case "independence" needs to be improved, and it relies heavily on the discipline Inspection Commission, and there are few clues transferred from other departments other than the discipline Inspection Commission; 5. In the aspect of compulsory measures, the proportion of applying bail waiting for trial is higher, the compulsory measures are changed more, the execution of bail pending trial is not in place, and the investigation means can cope with the current work, but the innovation and strength are not enough; (7) the average time of handling cases is 4.94 months, which exceeds the basic time limit of two months, and has the suspicion of "inversion of normality and exception". 8. The prosecution is insufficient and the punishment of light punishment is objective, so it is necessary to amend it. With regard to the above characteristics, laws or deficiencies, the author analyzes the causes and finds that there are the regional factors of social and economic development, the reasons of the Anti-Corruption Bureau of the Procuratorate, and the system. The historical and traditional reasons of the development of criminal justice. For some regional characteristics and deficiencies in investigating and handling cases, the author also puts forward his own views and countermeasures, such as strengthening crime prevention in high-risk areas, grasping grass-roots units and establishing information systems to expand the source of cases. Performance appraisal to promote the effective implementation of bail pending trial, and so on. In addition, the author makes a detailed analysis and elaboration on the two aspects of "the place where the investigation work can be strengthened" and "the insufficient revision of the prosecution and the light punishment of the sentence", which are especially important.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王建明;;論職務(wù)犯罪偵查強(qiáng)制措施及其立法完善[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2008年03期

2 何邦武;李珍蘋;;論職務(wù)犯罪的特殊偵查[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年09期

3 巫海波;;淺談我國職務(wù)犯罪偵查措施[J];法制與社會;2011年13期

4 孫岳芳;朱瑤瑤;;職務(wù)犯罪偵查手段的完善[J];法制與社會;2011年14期

5 劉巖;袁瓊燁;;職務(wù)犯罪輕刑化問題探討[J];法制與社會;2012年07期

6 謝佑平;鄧立軍;;德國的秘密偵查制度[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期

7 章衛(wèi)東;周英俊;;論強(qiáng)制措施在基層檢察院查辦職務(wù)犯罪案件中的適用[J];法制與社會;2012年18期

8 王祺國,劉周;職務(wù)犯罪偵查一體化問題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2005年10期

9 蘭志偉;鄭東;;職務(wù)犯罪輕刑化問題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2011年12期

10 易延友;;刑事強(qiáng)制措施體系及其完善[J];法學(xué)研究;2012年03期

本文編號：2406718