論民事訴訟與人民調(diào)解的銜接
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-08 11:17
【摘要】：目前我國正在從“訴訟時代”走向“后訴訟時代”,雖然訴訟更具正統(tǒng)性和權(quán)威性,但由于整個社會的法治理念在逐步改變,人們從原有對訴訟的盲目推崇,已經(jīng)發(fā)展到現(xiàn)在越來越理智的選擇解決糾紛的最優(yōu)辦法。 另外,隨著社會的發(fā)展,世界范圍內(nèi)訴訟爆炸,各國都意識到調(diào)解的重要性,調(diào)解的獨特優(yōu)勢也再度得以發(fā)揮。尤其是作為我國特有的東方經(jīng)驗——“人民調(diào)解制度”,在全世界強化調(diào)解重要性的大環(huán)境之下,在全國大力提倡人民調(diào)解復(fù)興的大背景之下,更是彌補了訴訟繁瑣、剛性及高費用等多種不足。然而現(xiàn)階段的人民調(diào)解制度也存在自身效力不強等劣勢�；诖�,只有嘗試調(diào)解與訴訟的相互融合,建立民事訴訟與人民調(diào)解的有效銜接機制,才能順應(yīng)時代的要求,更為合理有效的解決現(xiàn)代紛繁復(fù)雜的糾紛案件,實現(xiàn)訴訟與非訴解紛方式的良性發(fā)展,達(dá)到解紛方式的多元化和最優(yōu)化。因此,文章就我國民事訴訟與人民調(diào)解的銜接機制展開具體論述。 文章第一章是對民事訴訟和人民調(diào)解的概述。將民事訴訟的兩部分即民事審判和法院調(diào)解各自與人民調(diào)解的關(guān)系進行了分析,同時也表明了文章的觀點即逐步弱化法院調(diào)解,讓人民調(diào)解借鑒并代替法院調(diào)解,并直接與訴訟程序結(jié)合。第二章對民事訴訟和人民調(diào)解銜接的目的、法理基礎(chǔ)、原因及可行性等進行了闡述。一方面,《中華人民共和國人民調(diào)解法》等相關(guān)法律法規(guī)、司法解釋及相關(guān)地方性法律文件為兩者銜接奠定了合法性基礎(chǔ),另一方面,訴訟方式本身存在的問題和人民調(diào)解的強化趨勢等又進一步推動了兩者的銜接進程。同時,兩者的共同點決定了他們具有追求公平正義、實現(xiàn)和諧穩(wěn)定等相同的價值目標(biāo),而兩者的差異也正好能使其在銜接中互補與促進。這些都說明人民調(diào)解與民事訴訟的銜接具有相當(dāng)?shù)目尚行�。第三章則是以上海的“人民調(diào)解窗口”和黑龍江的“訴訟各階段全面銜接”兩地實例,敘述了民事訴訟和人民調(diào)解的銜接實踐。文章不僅對其基本理論進行了簡單闡述,而且在單獨剖析各自實踐經(jīng)驗優(yōu)劣勢的基礎(chǔ)上,針對性的給予了一些完善建議。第四章便是對兩者銜接機制的完善。作者首先站在一定高度,對完善的意義進行了抽象性的概括,隨后便在法律層面和操作層面對兩者的銜接提出了一定的完善措施。其中對于操作層面,作者進行了程序上和制度上的雙重探析,重點構(gòu)建了人民調(diào)解準(zhǔn)前置程序,并在強調(diào)明確人民調(diào)解業(yè)務(wù)范圍的同時,建立了調(diào)解員培訓(xùn)指導(dǎo)和銜接工作考核兩種制度。另外,作者也指出了兩者銜接時一些應(yīng)該注意的問題,這對今后銜接工作的開展具有良好的指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:At present, our country is moving from "litigation era" to "post-litigation era". Although litigation is more orthodox and authoritative, but because of the gradual change of the concept of rule of law in the whole society, people blindly praise litigation from the original. It has developed into a more and more rational choice of the best way to resolve disputes. In addition, with the development of society and the explosion of litigation all over the world, countries are aware of the importance of mediation, and the unique advantages of mediation have been brought into play again. In particular, as our country's unique oriental experience, "people's Mediation system", under the general environment of strengthening the importance of mediation throughout the world, and against the background of vigorously advocating the revival of people's mediation throughout the country, it has made up for the cumbersome litigation. Rigidity and high costs and other shortcomings. However, the current people's mediation system also has its own weak effectiveness and other disadvantages. Based on this, only by trying to integrate the mediation and litigation, and establishing an effective link mechanism between civil litigation and people's mediation, can we meet the requirements of the times and solve the complicated and complicated disputes more reasonably and effectively. To realize the benign development of litigation and non-litigation dispute resolution, to achieve the diversification and optimization of dispute resolution. Therefore, the article discusses the connection mechanism between civil action and people's mediation. The first chapter is the summary of civil action and people's mediation. The relationship between civil trial and court mediation and people's mediation is analyzed. At the same time, the viewpoint of the article is to gradually weaken court mediation, and let people's mediation learn from and replace court mediation. And directly combined with the proceedings. The second chapter expounds the purpose, legal basis, reasons and feasibility of the connection between civil action and people's mediation. On the one hand, the people's Mediation Law of the people's Republic of China and other relevant laws and regulations, judicial interpretation and relevant local legal documents have laid the legal foundation for the link between the two. On the other hand, The problems existing in the way of litigation and the strengthening trend of people's mediation have further promoted the convergence process of the two. At the same time, their common ground determines that they have the same value goal of pursuing fairness and justice, realizing harmony and stability, and the difference between them can make them complement and promote each other in cohesion. All these show that the people's mediation and civil proceedings are quite feasible. The third chapter describes the practice of linking civil litigation and people's mediation with the examples of "people's Mediation window" in Shanghai and "all stages of Litigation" in Heilongjiang Province. This paper not only gives a brief exposition of its basic theory, but also gives some perfect suggestions on the basis of analyzing the merits and demerits of their respective practical experiences. The fourth chapter is the perfection of the connection mechanism between the two. The author firstly generalizes the meaning of perfection from a certain height, and then puts forward some measures to improve the connection between the two at the level of law and operation. At the operational level, the author makes a double analysis of the procedure and the system, focuses on the construction of the people's mediation quasi-front procedure, and emphasizes the definition of the scope of the people's mediation business at the same time, Establish two systems of mediators training guidance and link-up work evaluation. In addition, the author also points out some problems that should be paid attention to in the connection between them, which has a good guiding significance for the development of cohesion in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：太原科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D925.14;D926
本文編號：2404529
[Abstract]:At present, our country is moving from "litigation era" to "post-litigation era". Although litigation is more orthodox and authoritative, but because of the gradual change of the concept of rule of law in the whole society, people blindly praise litigation from the original. It has developed into a more and more rational choice of the best way to resolve disputes. In addition, with the development of society and the explosion of litigation all over the world, countries are aware of the importance of mediation, and the unique advantages of mediation have been brought into play again. In particular, as our country's unique oriental experience, "people's Mediation system", under the general environment of strengthening the importance of mediation throughout the world, and against the background of vigorously advocating the revival of people's mediation throughout the country, it has made up for the cumbersome litigation. Rigidity and high costs and other shortcomings. However, the current people's mediation system also has its own weak effectiveness and other disadvantages. Based on this, only by trying to integrate the mediation and litigation, and establishing an effective link mechanism between civil litigation and people's mediation, can we meet the requirements of the times and solve the complicated and complicated disputes more reasonably and effectively. To realize the benign development of litigation and non-litigation dispute resolution, to achieve the diversification and optimization of dispute resolution. Therefore, the article discusses the connection mechanism between civil action and people's mediation. The first chapter is the summary of civil action and people's mediation. The relationship between civil trial and court mediation and people's mediation is analyzed. At the same time, the viewpoint of the article is to gradually weaken court mediation, and let people's mediation learn from and replace court mediation. And directly combined with the proceedings. The second chapter expounds the purpose, legal basis, reasons and feasibility of the connection between civil action and people's mediation. On the one hand, the people's Mediation Law of the people's Republic of China and other relevant laws and regulations, judicial interpretation and relevant local legal documents have laid the legal foundation for the link between the two. On the other hand, The problems existing in the way of litigation and the strengthening trend of people's mediation have further promoted the convergence process of the two. At the same time, their common ground determines that they have the same value goal of pursuing fairness and justice, realizing harmony and stability, and the difference between them can make them complement and promote each other in cohesion. All these show that the people's mediation and civil proceedings are quite feasible. The third chapter describes the practice of linking civil litigation and people's mediation with the examples of "people's Mediation window" in Shanghai and "all stages of Litigation" in Heilongjiang Province. This paper not only gives a brief exposition of its basic theory, but also gives some perfect suggestions on the basis of analyzing the merits and demerits of their respective practical experiences. The fourth chapter is the perfection of the connection mechanism between the two. The author firstly generalizes the meaning of perfection from a certain height, and then puts forward some measures to improve the connection between the two at the level of law and operation. At the operational level, the author makes a double analysis of the procedure and the system, focuses on the construction of the people's mediation quasi-front procedure, and emphasizes the definition of the scope of the people's mediation business at the same time, Establish two systems of mediators training guidance and link-up work evaluation. In addition, the author also points out some problems that should be paid attention to in the connection between them, which has a good guiding significance for the development of cohesion in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：太原科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D925.14;D926
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 強世功;;權(quán)力的組織網(wǎng)絡(luò)與法律的治理化——馬錫五審判方式與中國法律的新傳統(tǒng)[J];北大法律評論;2000年02期
2 強世功;“法律不入之地”的民事調(diào)解——一起“依法收貸”案的再分析[J];比較法研究;1998年03期
3 張華;張露藜;李克;;論人民調(diào)解與訴訟之互補關(guān)系[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年03期
4 石先廣;;人民調(diào)解、行政調(diào)解、司法調(diào)解有機銜接的對策思考——以上海市楊浦區(qū)整合調(diào)解資源的實踐探索為視點[J];中國司法;2006年08期
5 吳玲;;人民調(diào)解立法及其研究[J];中國司法;2009年05期
6 張衛(wèi)平;我國替代性糾紛解決機制的重構(gòu)[J];法律適用;2005年02期
7 黃斌;劉正;;論多元化糾紛解決機制的現(xiàn)狀、困境與出路 立足于我國法院的思考[J];法律適用;2007年11期
8 閆慶霞;;人民調(diào)解前置制度之反思——以民事程序選擇權(quán)為討論的出發(fā)點[J];法學(xué)家;2007年03期
9 嚴(yán)如春;;“背對背”調(diào)解的弊端及其矯正淺議[J];南京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年03期
10 敖妙;;我國與美國司法ADR的比較研究——兼論對構(gòu)建我國多元化糾紛解決機制的啟示[J];沈陽工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年03期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 吳瓊;論人民調(diào)解與訴訟程序相銜接的理論與實踐[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年
2 崔永振;訴訟與調(diào)解相銜接的制度化研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年
，本文編號：2404529
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2404529.html
最近更新
教材專著
