【摘要】：近年來,瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪日益增多,犯罪形態(tài)層出不窮,此類犯罪重則危害社會政治穩(wěn)定,危及改革、發(fā)展、穩(wěn)定大局,輕則破壞市場經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序,損害人民利益,如何有效查處瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪已成為當(dāng)前迫切需要解決的問題。本文以司法實(shí)踐中所遇到的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合刑事立法方面存在的不同觀點(diǎn),以引用、評析、歸納、闡述為論述順序,展開自己對于查處瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪相關(guān)問題的認(rèn)識。 首先,通過分析我國瀆職犯罪查處現(xiàn)狀和筆者所在某市瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪查處情況,可以得知瀆職犯罪在全國范圍內(nèi)仍處于多發(fā)勢態(tài)。此外,以檢察機(jī)關(guān)案件管理系統(tǒng)為依據(jù),結(jié)合筆者所在某市檢察機(jī)關(guān)瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪查處工作實(shí)際,實(shí)證分析了瀆職犯罪特點(diǎn)和瀆職犯罪查處工作特點(diǎn)。 其次,從司法實(shí)踐的角度,主要分析了制約當(dāng)前瀆職犯罪查處工作的主要因素,除了在相關(guān)立法、司法環(huán)節(jié)上存在弊端外,檢察機(jī)關(guān)自身在線索發(fā)現(xiàn)機(jī)制、人員配備、偵查協(xié)作機(jī)制和工作考評機(jī)制等方面凸顯出的矛盾及案件承辦人辦案水平不高也成為了影響當(dāng)前瀆職犯罪查處工作有效開展的瓶頸性問題。 最后,筆者對提高查處瀆職犯罪成效提出了一些具體的構(gòu)想。對于瀆職犯罪主體范圍問題、瀆職罪損失結(jié)果認(rèn)定問題以及瀆職罪判決輕刑化問題,應(yīng)在法律層面上進(jìn)一步細(xì)化和完善。在偵查機(jī)制建設(shè)上,檢察機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)對已不能滿足辦案需求的落后機(jī)制進(jìn)行改革。此外,筆者對提高承辦人辦案水平展開了幾點(diǎn)思考,包括非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的正確適用、改進(jìn)瀆職犯罪初查工作、提高電子筆錄制作水平和規(guī)范同步錄音錄像制作等。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the crime of malfeasance and tort has been increasing day by day, and criminal forms have been emerging in endlessly. Such crimes are serious in endangering social and political stability, endangering reform, development, stabilizing the overall situation, undermining the order of the market economy and harming the interests of the people. How to effectively investigate and deal with the crime of malfeasance has become an urgent problem to be solved. Based on the practical problems encountered in judicial practice and the different viewpoints in criminal legislation, this paper discusses the problems related to the investigation and punishment of malfeasance crimes in the order of exposition, analysis, induction and elaboration. First of all, through the analysis of the situation of malfeasance crime investigation and punishment in our country and the situation of malfeasance crime investigation in a certain city, we can know that dereliction of duty crime is still in a situation of frequent occurrence in the whole country. In addition, based on the case management system of procuratorial organs, combined with the actual investigation and punishment of malfeasance crimes of procuratorial organs in a certain city, this paper empirically analyzes the characteristics of malfeasance crimes and the characteristics of investigation and punishment of dereliction of duty crimes. Secondly, from the angle of judicial practice, it mainly analyzes the main factors that restrict the investigation and punishment of the current malfeasance crime. In addition to the drawbacks in the relevant legislation and judicial links, the procuratorial organs themselves find the mechanism of clue discovery and staffing. The contradiction of investigation cooperation mechanism and work evaluation mechanism and the low level of case handling have also become the bottleneck problem that affects the effective development of the investigation and handling of dereliction of duty. Finally, the author puts forward some concrete ideas to improve the effectiveness of investigation and punishment of dereliction of duty. For the scope of the subject of dereliction of duty, the determination of the loss result of dereliction of duty and the light punishment of dereliction of duty, it should be further refined and perfected on the legal level. In the construction of investigation mechanism, the procuratorial organ should reform the backward mechanism which can no longer meet the need of handling cases. In addition, the author puts forward some thoughts on how to improve the handling level of the case, including the correct application of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence, the improvement of the initial investigation of dereliction of duty, the improvement of the level of electronic record production and the standardization of the production of synchronous audio and video recordings, and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D925.2;D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊凱;論瀆職罪刑事立法之不足與完善[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

2 董邦俊;操宏均;秦新承;;檢察引導(dǎo)偵查之應(yīng)然方向[J];法學(xué);2010年04期

3 姚紅;;土地管理領(lǐng)域?yàn)^職犯罪案件的偵查[J];江淮法治;2010年18期

4 胡亮;;瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪的成因、特點(diǎn)及其預(yù)防對策[J];法制與社會;2011年25期

5 李忠誠;;瀆職罪主體問題研究[J];河南社會科學(xué);2010年03期

6 魏穎華;;瀆職罪輕刑現(xiàn)象基本問題研究[J];刑法論叢;2010年04期

7 張兆松;李志雄;章曉明;;瀆職罪立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)溯及力問題探析[J];人民檢察;2007年01期

8 趙選民;陳石元;;反瀆職侵權(quán)查案工作創(chuàng)新發(fā)展的實(shí)踐與思考[J];人民檢察;2007年14期

9 劉斌;;檢察機(jī)關(guān)辦理職務(wù)犯罪案件電子筆錄應(yīng)規(guī)范制作[J];人民檢察;2010年02期

10 呂廣倫;羅國良;劉雅玲;王鋒永;馮黔剛;朱晶晶;;《關(guān)于辦理刑事案件排除非法證據(jù)若干問題的規(guī)定》理解與適用[J];人民檢察;2010年16期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 廣東省江門市江海區(qū)人民檢察院 陳錫章　張小錚;[N];檢察日報(bào);2010年

，

本文編號：2302339