【摘要】：“馬錫五審判方式”是以抗日戰(zhàn)爭時期任陜甘寧邊區(qū)高等法院隴東分庭庭長的馬錫五同志的名字命名的一種審判方式,其特點是“攜案卷下鄉(xiāng)、深入農(nóng)村、調查研究、實事求是地了解案情；便利群眾訴訟、手續(xù)簡便、不拘形式；依靠群眾、教育群眾、尊重群眾意見”以及“審判與調解結合、注重調解”等,由于這種審判方式在當時非常貼近革命根據(jù)地的實際,收到了很好的政治效果、法律效果和社會效果。 當前,司法實務部門對“馬錫五審判方式”的重提和回歸熱衷有加,尤其是河南省各級人民法院走在實踐中的前列,其他地方法院如陜西、海南、廣西等地區(qū)也在不同程度地嘗試和推廣“馬錫五審判方式”�！伴_庭開到庭院里,調解調到炕頭上”,巡回審判,就地辦案,方便群眾訴訟,是司法實務部門貫徹和落實社會主義法治理念、“司法便民”、“執(zhí)法為民”精神和最高人民法院關于推進“三個重點工作”要求的具體體現(xiàn),同時也表明“馬錫五審判方式”一定程度上的回歸。但從有關報道和社會議論中可以發(fā)現(xiàn)在適用“馬錫五審判方式”的過程中,部分法院在理解、認識和適用“馬錫五審判方式”過程中卻存在偏差,甚至是誤區(qū),如沒有全面理解“馬錫五審判方式”的精神實質和內涵、一味強調形式上的“同化”、過分追求調解結案率、沒有很好把握我國目前的實際情況、現(xiàn)代訴訟制度及法治的要求與“馬錫五審判方式”的區(qū)別與結合等情形。 目前學界對“馬錫五審判方式”討論也較多,有從法理學、司法理念的角度進行論述,也有從司法改革、司法制度的角度進行論述,這些討論大多是從“馬錫五審判方式”產(chǎn)生的政治、經(jīng)濟、社會原因進行回顧；也有部分學者結合我國的實際國情、司法現(xiàn)狀論述“馬錫五審判方式”在當今社會的普遍適用性、“馬錫五審判方式”回歸的現(xiàn)實意義和必要性,同時也有學者對此持否定態(tài)度。但學者對“馬錫五審判方式”在當今究竟是保留其精神實質、價值導向等宏觀層面還是選擇適用其具體的操作方式和微觀的制度以及如何完善我國司法制度和糾紛解決機制等方而,卻鮮有深入的研究和論述。 木文試從“馬錫五審判方式”回歸的原因及其在目前司法實踐中存 在價值和問題進行剖析和研究,采用歷史分析法、價值判斷分析法和社會分析法等研究方法,并在此基礎上從法理學的角度進行反思,得出若干啟示,提出若干建議,以期能對進一步改進和完善我國的司法制度有所幫助。
[Abstract]:Ma Xiwu's trial method was named after Comrade Ma Xiwu, who was president of Longdong Chamber of the Supreme Court of the Shensi-Kansu-Ningxia Border region during the War of Resistance against Japan. Its characteristics are: "go to the countryside with case files, go deep into the countryside, investigate and study." To understand the facts of the case in a realistic manner; To facilitate mass litigation, simple procedures, informal form; Relying on the masses, educating the masses, respecting the opinions of the masses, and "combining trial with mediation, paying attention to mediation," and so on. Because this kind of trial method was very close to the reality of the revolutionary base area at that time, it received very good political results. Legal and social effects. At present, judicial practice departments are keen on the re-introduction and return of the "Ma Xiwu trial method," especially in Henan Province, where people's courts at all levels are at the forefront of practice. Other local courts, such as Shaanxi and Hainan, Guangxi and other regions are also trying and popularizing Ma Xiwu trial method to varying degrees. "the court session is open to the courtyard, the mediation is transferred to the Kang head," the itinerant trial, the local handling of cases, and the convenience of mass litigation are the implementation and implementation of the socialist concept of the rule of law by judicial practice departments, and "judicial convenience for the people." The spirit of "enforcing the law for the people" and the request of the Supreme people's Court to promote the "three key tasks" are embodied, and the return of "Ma Xi-wu 's trial mode" to a certain extent is also shown. However, from the relevant reports and social discussions, it can be found that in the process of applying the "Ma Xi-wu trial method", some courts have deviations or even misunderstandings in the process of understanding, recognizing and applying "Ma Xi-wu trial method". If we do not fully understand the spiritual essence and connotation of "Ma Xi-wu 's trial method," blindly emphasize the formal "assimilation", and over-pursue the mediation settlement rate, we will not have a good grasp of the current actual situation in our country. The difference and combination between the modern litigation system and the requirement of the rule of law and Ma Xiwu's trial mode. At present, there are more discussions in academic circles on "Ma Xi-wu 's trial method", including from the angle of jurisprudence and judicial idea, and also from the angle of judicial reform and judicial system. Most of these discussions are reviewed from the political, economic and social reasons of the "Ma Xi-wu trial method"; Some scholars have also discussed the general applicability of "Ma Xi-wu trial method" and the practical significance and necessity of "Ma Xi-wu trial method" returning to the society in the light of the actual situation of our country. At the same time, some scholars have a negative attitude to this. However, scholars have preserved the spiritual essence of Ma Xi-wu 's trial method at present. At the macro level, such as value orientation, we choose to apply its specific operation mode and micro system, and how to perfect our judicial system and dispute resolution mechanism, but there is little in-depth study and discussion. The paper tries to analyze and study the reasons for the return of "Ma Xi-wu trial method" and its existing value and problems in the current judicial practice, and adopts the methods of historical analysis, value judgment analysis and social analysis, and other research methods, such as historical analysis method, value judgment analysis method and social analysis method, etc. On the basis of this, the author rethinks from the angle of jurisprudence, draws some enlightenment and puts forward some suggestions, in the hope of further improving and perfecting the judicial system of our country.
【學位授予單位】：山西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 李娟;;馬錫五審判方式產(chǎn)生的背景分析[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);2008年02期

2 ;馬錫五審判方式與現(xiàn)代法治[J];福建法學;2001年01期

3 江偉;謝俊;;“馬錫五審判方式”的意義及實現(xiàn)[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2009年04期

4 張衛(wèi)平;;回歸“馬錫五”的思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2009年05期

5 歐陽若濤;;“馬錫五審判方式”在司法改革中的當代意蘊[J];西南政法大學學報;2009年04期

相關重要報紙文章 前2條

1 本報記者 朱云峰邋譚曉峰;[N];人民法院報;2007年

2 本報評論員;[N];人民法院報;2011年

，

本文編號：2298377