【摘要】：我國自1986年建立企業(yè)破產制度以來，一直在對于破產法律制度進行完善和修正，但在國有企業(yè)破產的過程中，大量國有資產流失，，債權人利益遭受損害的事件屢見不鮮，已經影響了我國經濟安全和破產法律秩序。而2006年修訂的企業(yè)破產法并沒有對于破產責任和破產監(jiān)督進行明確、詳細且具備可操作性的規(guī)定，致使現實中以破產為名實施逃債的行為屢禁不止。本文通過英美法系和大陸法系破產管理人制度的對比，深入闡述了英國的破產責任制度。通過對經濟發(fā)展周期性對破產法律秩序需求等問題影響進行分析，得出我國目前需要將國有企業(yè)破產市場化、法治化的結論。通過討論國有企業(yè)破產需求與檢察權契合點的方式論證了檢察機關對我國國有企業(yè)破產進行法律監(jiān)督的合理性和可行性。結合對檢察機關在國有企業(yè)破產各個階段的主要監(jiān)督任務提出了檢察機關監(jiān)督國有企業(yè)破產過程的地位，論證了檢察機關在國有企業(yè)破產監(jiān)督中的主要任務和基本原則。在基本原則和法律地位的指導下，從檢察機關對國有企業(yè)破產準備階段的監(jiān)督、受理階段的監(jiān)督、宣告階段的監(jiān)督等方面建構了我國檢察機關對國有企業(yè)破產事實監(jiān)督的基本體系和基本配套制度。同時論證了我國現有破產管理人制度存在的缺陷和檢察機關進入國有企業(yè)破產監(jiān)督后對缺陷的補足，以期真正實現在國有企業(yè)破產過程中完善破產責任監(jiān)督、保護國有資產、維護市場秩序的目的。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of the bankruptcy system in 1986, China has been perfecting and revising the bankruptcy law system. However, in the process of bankruptcy of state-owned enterprises, a large number of state-owned assets have been lost and the interests of creditors have been damaged. Has affected our economic security and bankruptcy legal order. However, the revised enterprise bankruptcy law in 2006 does not have clear, detailed and operable provisions on bankruptcy liability and supervision, which leads to the repeated prohibition of debt evasion in the name of bankruptcy. This paper expounds the bankruptcy liability system in Britain by comparing the bankruptcy administrator system between the common law system and the continental law system. Based on the analysis of the influence of the periodicity of economic development on the demand of bankruptcy law and order, the conclusion is drawn that our country needs to make the bankruptcy of state-owned enterprises market-oriented and legalized at present. The rationality and feasibility of the procuratorial organ's legal supervision over the bankruptcy of state-owned enterprises in China are demonstrated by discussing the coincidence point between the bankruptcy demand and the procuratorial power of the state-owned enterprises. Combined with the main supervision tasks of procuratorial organs in various stages of bankruptcy of state-owned enterprises, this paper puts forward the position of procuratorial organs in supervising the bankruptcy process of state-owned enterprises, and demonstrates the main tasks and basic principles of procuratorial organs in the supervision of bankruptcy of state-owned enterprises. Under the guidance of the basic principles and legal status, from the supervision of the procuratorial organs over the stage of bankruptcy preparation and acceptance of state-owned enterprises, The supervision at the stage of declaration constructs the basic system and supporting system of the supervision of the fact of bankruptcy of the state-owned enterprises by the procuratorial organs in our country. At the same time, it demonstrates the defects of the existing bankruptcy administrator system in China and the complement of the defects after the procuratorial organ enters the bankruptcy supervision of the state-owned enterprises, in order to realize the perfection of the supervision of the bankruptcy responsibility and the protection of the state-owned assets in the process of the bankruptcy of the state-owned enterprises. The purpose of maintaining market order.
【學位授予單位】：哈爾濱工程大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.92;D926.34

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉永澤,楊吉林,于保和,任海松;國有企業(yè)破產過程中的國有資產流失問題研究[J];財經問題研究;2002年07期

2 蘇月霞;淺談對改制企業(yè)實施監(jiān)管的看法[J];對外經貿財會;2005年04期

3 黎蜀寧;論法國民事行政檢察監(jiān)督制度[J];法學雜志;2004年03期

4 馬明生;王欽杰;;論民事行政檢察制度的完善[J];法學雜志;2007年04期

5 湯維建;;我國破產法草案在重整程序設計上的若干爭議問題之我見[J];法學家;2005年02期

6 常怡;重慶市、海南省人民檢察院聯(lián)合課題組;;民事行政裁判執(zhí)行的檢察監(jiān)督[J];法學家;2006年04期

7 高玉鳳;;從Northern Rock銀行引發(fā)的監(jiān)管思考——商業(yè)銀行信用風險與法律監(jiān)督[J];法制與社會;2008年12期

8 齊治蘭;淺談我國破產法的缺陷與完善[J];國際關系學院學報;2002年03期

9 陳麗華,楊羅根;論破產法的價值定位及相關制度完善[J];湖南大學學報(社會科學版);2004年01期

10 馬登科;;民事檢察抗訴制度的再完善[J];華南農業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2009年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 周劍文;破產管理人選任、監(jiān)督制度比較研究[D];南昌大學;2008年

本文編號：2122253