本文選題：公眾情感 + 形式合理性��； 參考：《武漢理工大學學報(社會科學版)》2013年01期

【摘要】：刑事司法裁判的作出并非是一個完全依照刑事司法規(guī)范進行純粹理性的、邏輯推理的過程,公眾情感的合理融入會使裁判結果在合法的基礎上更加合情、合理。法官情感與公眾情感的對接,法律形式合理性與實質合理性的統(tǒng)一,刑事判決的法律效果與社會效果的統(tǒng)一,都需要刑事判決納入公眾情感的考量。具體到操作層面就需要法官在刑事司法過程中,在司法為民理念的指導下,進行人本主義解釋,給予公眾情感以合理關照,協(xié)調法與情的二元關系。同時,在制度上也要進行積極的創(chuàng)新與改革,如人民陪審團制度。
[Abstract]:The decision of criminal justice is not a purely rational and logical process according to the norms of criminal justice. The reasonable integration of public emotion will make the judgment result more reasonable and reasonable on the basis of legality. The connection between judge's emotion and public emotion, the unification of legal form rationality and substantive rationality, and the unification of legal effect and social effect of criminal judgment need to be taken into consideration by public emotion. In the process of criminal justice, under the guidance of the concept of judicature for the people, the judge should explain humanism, give public emotion reasonable attention, and coordinate the dual relationship between law and emotion. At the same time, the system should also carry out positive innovation and reform, such as the people's jury system.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學法學院;
【基金】：西南政法大學研究生科研創(chuàng)新計劃重點項目(2011XZYJS010)
【分類號】：D926.2

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 孫洪坤;沉默權的代價[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2002年04期

2 林婷;權威與秩序——對于中間組織缺失與整合之研究[J];安徽師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2005年01期

3 張，

本文編號：1943408