發(fā)布時間：2018-03-23 01:28

  本文選題：錯誤　切入點：公證　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2006年3月1日,新中國第一部公證法《中華人民共和國公證法》頒布施行,公證機(jī)構(gòu)的性質(zhì)發(fā)生了根本的變化,公證機(jī)構(gòu)出具錯誤公證書由原來承擔(dān)的行政責(zé)任變化為民事責(zé)任,對錯誤公證書的法律救濟(jì)由原來通過行政申訴、行政復(fù)議以及行政訴訟程序來解決改變?yōu)橥ㄟ^到公證機(jī)構(gòu)提出復(fù)查、對復(fù)查處理決定不服到地方公證協(xié)會投訴以及就公證書內(nèi)容爭議向人民法院提起訴訟來解決。而現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定由于出臺較晚,許多規(guī)定過于原則,甚至缺乏合理性、科學(xué)性,導(dǎo)致當(dāng)事人對錯誤公證書的法律救濟(jì)在實踐中往往走不通,告狀無門,當(dāng)事人、公證事項的利害關(guān)系人的合法權(quán)益難以得到有效的保障。 對錯誤公證書的法律救濟(jì)涉及的問題龐雜,本文不求面面俱到,只是有針對性地探討了錯誤公證書法律救濟(jì)的界定、主要途徑、意義以及現(xiàn)行法律體制對錯誤公證書救濟(jì)的諸多弊端和缺失,并對我國現(xiàn)行錯誤公證書的法律規(guī)定提出立法 改進(jìn)的建議。全文共分三個部分: 第一部分錯誤公證書的概念、種類及認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)錯誤公證書目前在學(xué)理上沒有明確的概念,筆者按照現(xiàn)有的法律、法規(guī)及規(guī)范性文件的規(guī)定,概括總結(jié)出錯誤公證書的概念是指由于公證員的故意或過失,導(dǎo)致公證事項全部或部分不真實、不合法,或者公證書的證詞、格式不當(dāng)?shù)墓C書。它的種類包括實體有錯誤的公證書、程序有錯誤的公證書、有瑕疵的公證書三種,并概括了錯誤公證書的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第二部分錯誤公證書法律救濟(jì)的界定、主要途徑及意義 筆者根據(jù)法律救濟(jì)的概念,總結(jié)歸納錯誤公證書的法律救濟(jì)是指公證機(jī)構(gòu)在辦理公證的過程中,由于公證員的故意或過失而出具了錯誤公證書,公證當(dāng)事人、利害關(guān)系人認(rèn)為侵害了或者可能侵害了其合法權(quán)益時,依法請求有關(guān)公證機(jī)構(gòu)、公證協(xié)會采取措施復(fù)查、改正、撤銷該公證書或者向人民法院提起訴訟,要求賠償,以保護(hù)其合法權(quán)益的活動。 錯誤公證書法律救濟(jì)具備五個特證:糾正性和補救性、權(quán)利性、事后性、合法性、從屬性。 錯誤公證書法律救濟(jì)的主要途徑、特點及相互關(guān)系。歸納總結(jié),錯誤公證書法律救濟(jì)途徑主要有公證機(jī)構(gòu)的復(fù)查救濟(jì)、投訴救濟(jì)、訴訟救濟(jì)以及通過公賠償基金賠償?shù)染葷?jì)途徑。并論述了錯誤公證書法律救濟(jì)的意義。 第三部分我國現(xiàn)行錯誤公證書法律救濟(jì)的規(guī)定評析、弊端及完善建議筆者通過對我國現(xiàn)行錯誤公證書法律救濟(jì)的規(guī)定評析、弊端及完善建議的論述。通過大量的實例,論述了我國有關(guān)錯誤公證書法律救濟(jì)制度的不完善之處及相關(guān)建議
[Abstract]:On March 1, 2006, the first notarization Law of the people's Republic of China was promulgated and put into effect. When a notary authority issues a wrong notary certificate, the original administrative liability is changed into civil liability, and the legal relief for the wrong notary certificate is originally made through an administrative appeal, Administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation procedures to resolve the change to be submitted to a notary authority for review, The decision to deal with the reexamination will not be satisfied with the complaint of the local notarization association or the filing of a lawsuit in the people's court over the content dispute of the notary certificate. However, due to the late introduction of the current legal provisions, many of the provisions are too principled, even lack of rationality and scientific nature. As a result, the legal remedy for the wrong notarization often fails in practice, there is no door to the complaint, and the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and the interested parties in the notarization matter are difficult to be effectively protected. The problems involved in the legal remedy of the wrong notary certificate are numerous and complicated. This paper does not seek to cover all aspects, but probes into the definition and main ways of the legal remedy for the wrong notary certificate. The significance and the malpractice and deficiency of the current legal system to remedy the wrong notary certificate are put forward, and the legislation on the current legal provisions of the wrong notarization certificate in our country is put forward. Recommendations for improvement. The full text is divided into three parts:. The first part is the concept, category and standard notarization of false notarization. There is no clear concept in theory at present. The author according to the existing laws, regulations and normative documents, Summing up the concept of false notarization refers to the testimony of the notary who, in whole or in part, is not true, illegal, or notarized, as a result of the intention or fault of the notary, It includes three kinds of notaries: the entity has the wrong notarial certificate, the procedure has the wrong notary certificate, and the defective notary certificate, and generalizes the identification standard of the wrong notary certificate. The second part is the definition, main ways and significance of the legal remedy of the wrong notary certificate. According to the concept of legal remedy, the author summarizes that the legal remedy of the wrong notary certificate refers to the notary agency issuing the wrong notary certificate, notarization party, due to the notary's intention or fault in the process of notarization. If an interested party considers that it has infringed or may infringe on its legitimate rights and interests, it shall, in accordance with law, request the relevant notary agency and the notary association to take measures to review, correct, revoke the notarial certificate or file a lawsuit in a people's court, and claim compensation, Activities to protect their legitimate rights and interests. The legal relief of false notarization has five special certificates: corrective and remedial, right, hindsight, legality and subordination. The main ways, characteristics and mutual relations of legal remedies for false notaries. Summing up and summing up, the main ways of legal relief for false notaries are the reexamination relief by notaries, the remedies for complaints, The remedy of litigation and compensation through public compensation fund is discussed, and the significance of legal remedy of wrong notary certificate is discussed. In the third part, the author comments on the provisions of the legal remedy of the current wrong notary certificate in our country, and suggests the improvement of the legal remedy of the wrong notary certificate. The author comments on the provisions of the legal relief of the wrong notary certificate in our country, discusses the malpractice and the consummation suggestion. This paper discusses the imperfections of the legal remedy system of the wrong notary certificate in our country and the relevant suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 孫健;;對公證書撤銷權(quán)的法律解析[J];中國公證;2009年06期

2 奚仲興;梁鐘允;;訴訟與實踐中相關(guān)公證爭議問題的實證分析[J];中國公證;2010年12期

3 宮曉冰;中國公證制度的完善[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年05期

，

本文編號：1651304