本文選題：公共　切入點：理性　出處：《政法論叢》2017年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：在某種意義上,法律是價值選擇的理性化和制度化安排。司法理性是通過程序參與者之間的理性溝通建立起來的,是法律理性的實現(xiàn)和延伸。司法具有理性建構(gòu)功能,司法在解決糾紛、救濟(jì)權(quán)利和發(fā)展法律的過程中闡釋和發(fā)展公共理性。法官通過審理和裁決機(jī)制對社會價值進(jìn)行界定,闡明憲法和法律的公共價值,賦予公共價值以公共理性的意義。公眾對司法活動和結(jié)果形成的主流看法也具有公共性,其中內(nèi)涵了解決利益沖突的社會共識,從而為法官發(fā)現(xiàn)和確立公共理性準(zhǔn)備了必要的條件。隨著協(xié)商民主在世界范圍內(nèi)的發(fā)展,許多國家司法都將民意納入公共理性的建構(gòu)過程,法官在審理疑難案件過程中越來越注重在解釋法律、建構(gòu)法律意義時適度地考慮社會的主流觀點和意見,使個案的裁判建立在一定的民意基礎(chǔ)上。公民參與司法對法律公共理性的闡釋和司法理性的建構(gòu)具有積極意義,陪審制度是司法民主的重要實現(xiàn)途徑,陪審員在案件審理過程中,也能夠?qū)⑸鐣姷膬r值觀注入法律事實和法律規(guī)則的建構(gòu)之中,從而使法律的適用回應(yīng)人民的價值訴求,更體現(xiàn)公共理性的要求。
[Abstract]:In a certain sense, law is the rational and institutionalized arrangement of value choice. Judicial rationality is established through rational communication among procedural participants, and is the realization and extension of legal rationality. Judicial interpretation and development of public rationality in the process of resolving disputes, the right to remedy and the development of law. Judges define the social value through the mechanism of trial and adjudication, and expound the public value of the constitution and the law. Public values are endowed with the meaning of public rationality. The mainstream views of the public on judicial activities and results are also public, which contains the social consensus to resolve conflicts of interest. With the development of deliberative democracy in the world, many countries have brought public opinion into the construction process of public rationality. Judges are paying more and more attention to the interpretation of the law and the construction of legal significance in the course of trying difficult cases, taking into account the mainstream views and opinions of the society appropriately. The judicial participation of citizens has positive significance to the interpretation of legal public rationality and the construction of judicial rationality. The jury system is an important way to realize judicial democracy. Jurors can also inject the values of the public into the construction of legal facts and legal rules in the course of case trial, so that the application of the law can respond to the value demands of the people and reflect the demands of public rationality.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：江蘇省哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)基金重點項目“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意的司法應(yīng)對研究”(11FXA001)的階段性研究成果
【分類號】：D926

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄧;李海青;;政治哲學(xué)視野中的公共理性的特點[J];資料通訊;2007年02期

2 史云貴;黃炯z，

本文編號：1617102