本文選題：律師　切入點(diǎn)：權(quán)利　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：律師制度是訴訟中一項(xiàng)十分重要的制度。把律師引入到訴訟程序中,讓其站在當(dāng)事人一邊,賦予其廣泛的訴訟權(quán)利以維護(hù)當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益,并將其參與的程度、狀況如何看作是訴訟法治化的重要指標(biāo),是基于當(dāng)事人的自身特點(diǎn)和訴訟地位的特別需要,也是基于在訴訟活動中對權(quán)力的制約和監(jiān)督,維護(hù)司法公正、維護(hù)社會正義的需要。新《律師法》中律師的權(quán)利得到了較大的發(fā)展,這就為改善律師執(zhí)業(yè)環(huán)境、充分發(fā)揮律師的職能作用提供了有力的法律保障。但從已規(guī)定的權(quán)利的實(shí)效性和權(quán)利的充足性角度分析,新《律師法》仍然存在缺憾,在現(xiàn)實(shí)社會中,簡略、籠統(tǒng)的立法規(guī)定解決不了律師在執(zhí)業(yè)中遇到的各種干預(yù),以致會見權(quán)、閱卷權(quán)、調(diào)查取證權(quán)的行使仍然困難重重,這些問題的存在必然會影響律師作用的充分發(fā)揮,乃至影響整個(gè)國家的民主、法制進(jìn)程。 本文主要從四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述： 第一部分：主要介紹了律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利的內(nèi)涵和基礎(chǔ),包括律師權(quán)利的概念及內(nèi)容,以及保障律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利的理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分：主要從兩個(gè)方面對域外關(guān)于律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利保障進(jìn)行考察,首先介紹國外的一些律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利保障的特點(diǎn)和區(qū)別,進(jìn)而引出對律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利保障的啟不. 第三部分：主要從我國實(shí)踐出發(fā),總結(jié)出我國律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利保障中的問題,包括立法、司法、管理體制和觀念四個(gè)部分,然后分析了引起這些問題的原因。 第四部分：提出完善我國律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利的對策,主要有完善相關(guān)立法、實(shí)現(xiàn)控辯平衡、重建律師管理體制和改善律師執(zhí)業(yè)環(huán)境,希望通過這些措施推動我國刑事訴訟進(jìn)一步民主化、制度化。
[Abstract]:The lawyer system is a very important system in litigation. The lawyer is introduced into the litigation procedure, let him side with the litigant, endow him with extensive litigation right to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the litigant, and the degree of their participation. How to regard the situation as an important indicator of the legalization of litigation is based on the characteristics of the parties and the special needs of the status of the litigation, and also on the restriction and supervision of the power in the litigation activities, so as to safeguard the judicial justice. The need to safeguard social justice. The rights of lawyers in the new Law on lawyers have been greatly developed, which is in order to improve the environment for lawyers to practise. Giving full play to the function of lawyers provides a powerful legal guarantee. However, from the point of view of the effectiveness of the rights already stipulated and the adequacy of the rights, there are still shortcomings in the new lawyer's Law. In the real society, the law is brief. The general legislative provisions can not solve all kinds of interference encountered by lawyers in their practice, so that the exercise of the right to interview, the right to read papers and the right to investigate and collect evidence are still very difficult, and the existence of these problems will inevitably affect the full play of the role of lawyers. And even affect the process of democracy and the rule of law throughout the country. This article mainly discusses from four aspects:. The first part mainly introduces the connotation and foundation of lawyer's right of practice, including the concept and content of lawyer's right, and the theoretical basis of protecting lawyer's right of practice. The second part: mainly carries on the investigation from two aspects about the lawyer's practice right safeguard, first introduces some foreign lawyers' practice right safeguard characteristic and the difference, then leads to the lawyer's practice right safeguard not to inspire. The third part: from the practice of our country, summarizes the problems in the protection of lawyers' right of practice, including legislation, judicature, management system and concept, and then analyzes the causes of these problems. Part 4th: put forward the countermeasures to perfect the lawyer's right to practise in our country, mainly include perfecting the relevant legislation, realizing the balance of prosecution and defense, rebuilding the lawyer's management system and improving the lawyer's practice environment. Through these measures, we hope to promote the further democratization and institutionalization of criminal proceedings in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張淑亞;董健;張慶林;;律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利現(xiàn)狀評析及其立法完善[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年08期

2 施鵬鵬;;法國律師制度述評[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年06期

3 程滔;論律師的職業(yè)秘密[J];中國司法;2005年04期

4 謝小劍;郝凌云;;論對辯護(hù)律師辦公場所或者住宅搜查的程序控制[J];中國司法;2006年02期

5 黎玉;;律師道德風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其防范[J];中國司法;2008年11期

6 周章金;;論律師執(zhí)業(yè)的行政法律責(zé)任[J];福建師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期

7 杜清森;;走出刑辯的困境——律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利的法律保護(hù)與制度保障論析[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

8 朱曉潔;;論新《律師法》對律師的辯護(hù)權(quán)能的完善和不足[J];法制與社會;2008年35期

9 彭霞;;淺析中國律師的權(quán)利[J];法制與社會;2009年04期

10 林祖云;;律師職業(yè)獨(dú)立性問題探析[J];法制與社會;2009年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 姜紅;論我國刑事訴訟中律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利與司法權(quán)力的沖突[D];湘潭大學(xué);2002年

2 馮創(chuàng);特殊對象群體——律師職業(yè)道德建設(shè)問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

3 毛啟剛;論律師在偵查階段的介入及其主要權(quán)利[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

4 金蘋;論我國律師性質(zhì)的定位[D];中南大學(xué);2006年

5 楊聰;論我國偵查訊問程序中律師在場權(quán)的確立[D];中南大學(xué);2006年

6 姚旺昊;偵查程序律師辯護(hù)研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2008年

7 陶興亞;論律師文化[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

8 楊杰;律師的職業(yè)角色定位及其職責(zé)[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1617096