本文關(guān)鍵詞：探析我國監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督之問題與完善　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督 監(jiān)督觀念 羈押場(chǎng)所死因調(diào)查

【摘要】：監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督是我國檢察監(jiān)督職能的重要組成部分，由于監(jiān)管理念、制度、立法等方面的原因，，其未能取得良好監(jiān)督效果：錯(cuò)捕錯(cuò)押、超期羈押、刑訊逼供、被羈押人員非正常死亡事件時(shí)有發(fā)生。隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)的發(fā)展，這些事件被廣泛傳播，造成社會(huì)對(duì)監(jiān)所安全保障問題的質(zhì)疑，監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的問題也隨之暴露，并亟待解決。 2012年,“尊重和保障人權(quán)”入《刑事訴訟法》；該法亦進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大了檢察監(jiān)督的范圍；第二百五十五條將暫予監(jiān)外執(zhí)行的檢察監(jiān)督介入時(shí)間提前、同時(shí)第二百六十二條將減刑、假釋階段的檢察監(jiān)督介入時(shí)間提前，向同步監(jiān)督發(fā)展。立法的完善，實(shí)為進(jìn)一步完善、發(fā)展監(jiān)所檢察制度的良好契機(jī)。 本文運(yùn)用演繹推理法、實(shí)證分析法、歷史研究法、價(jià)值分析法、組織移植的法律移植方法等研究方法進(jìn)行研究。圍繞著我國監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督是什么：監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的概念、特征、現(xiàn)狀以及通過對(duì)國外主要國家的相關(guān)檢察監(jiān)督概況進(jìn)行分析得出檢察監(jiān)督的基本內(nèi)涵及其存在的理論基礎(chǔ)；接下來分析其運(yùn)行的怎么樣：主觀方面的因素及客觀方面的因素制約下出現(xiàn)的問題；最后提出了該如何對(duì)我國監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督進(jìn)行完善的建議。 文章的四部分分別為： 第一部分主要分析我國監(jiān)所檢察的內(nèi)涵、業(yè)務(wù)內(nèi)容、特征及理論淵源。這部分的概念是通過演繹推理的方法得出的，業(yè)務(wù)內(nèi)容是結(jié)合自身工作實(shí)際所做闡述，作為本文的論述基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分是對(duì)我國監(jiān)所檢察制度的運(yùn)行態(tài)樣進(jìn)行分析，并對(duì)域外有代表性的國家的監(jiān)所檢察進(jìn)行探究。通過分析美國、法國、日本、俄羅斯的監(jiān)所檢察相關(guān)制度，以期為解決問題提供有益思路。法國是現(xiàn)代檢察權(quán)的發(fā)源地，美國作為英美法系的代表其對(duì)監(jiān)所的監(jiān)督權(quán)主要是通過法院判決的形式行使，俄羅斯和日本的檢察制度對(duì)我國檢察制度的影響最大，其中以蘇聯(lián)的檢察制度影響最為深遠(yuǎn)，選取這四個(gè)國家進(jìn)行分析具有代表性。對(duì)比我國的監(jiān)所檢察制度，得知我國的監(jiān)所檢察的駐監(jiān)檢察室方式應(yīng)該要比域外的巡察方式檢察監(jiān)督在一定程度上講更能有效監(jiān)督監(jiān)所的違法監(jiān)管行為。但是，我國這種更好的制度卻沒有發(fā)揮該有的作用，排除制度固有的局限，我們也不難得知制度的運(yùn)行過程中存在著問題。 第三部分在對(duì)我國監(jiān)所檢察制度運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上，提出我國監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督存在的問題。主要從兩方面進(jìn)行論述：其中觀念陳舊是主觀方面，包括事后、被動(dòng)監(jiān)督，對(duì)立式或大和諧式監(jiān)督，以及工作形式化等問題；客觀方面則以羈押場(chǎng)所死因調(diào)查制度不完善、缺乏對(duì)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的再監(jiān)督制度、立法缺陷為基本點(diǎn)展開論述。 第四部分是提出對(duì)上一部分問題的完善拙見，即更新檢察監(jiān)督觀念，改良工作機(jī)制，建立羈押場(chǎng)所死因調(diào)查制度，增強(qiáng)對(duì)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的監(jiān)督，完善立法，主客觀雙管齊下，共克監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的弊端。 本文通過對(duì)以上問題的梳理、論述，希望對(duì)完善我國的監(jiān)所檢察制度，進(jìn)一步提高監(jiān)所檢察的工作實(shí)效，為更好的保障被羈押人員的合法權(quán)益提供有益的參考。
[Abstract]:Prison supervision is an important part of the function of procuratorial supervision in our country, because of the regulatory philosophy, system, legislation and other aspects of the reasons, it failed to achieve good effect of Supervision: wrong arrests and extended detention, inquisition by torture of detainees, non normal deaths have occurred. With the development of the network, these events are widely spread, causing social problems for the prison security question, prison supervision problems, and need to be solved urgently.
2012, "respect and safeguard human rights" into "Criminal Procedure Law >; the law also further expand the scope of procuratorial supervision; 255th of the temporary probation supervision intervention ahead of time, while 262nd will be commuted, procuratorial supervision intervention time advance parole stage, to the development of synchronous supervision. The perfection of the legislation. It is further improved, a good opportunity for development of the procuratorial supervision system.
Using deductive reasoning method, empirical analysis method, historical research method, value analysis method, research method of tissue transplantation of legal transplantation methods. Around China's procuratorial supervision and supervision is what prison Supervision: concepts, characteristics, status and analysis of the basic connotation of the procuratorial supervision and its theoretical basis the major countries of foreign related procuratorial supervision situation; then analyse how the operation: the restriction factors of subjective factors and objective aspects of the problem; finally puts forward how to Chinese prison supervision to improve the proposal.
The four parts of the article are as follows:
The first part mainly analyzes the connotation, business content, characteristics and theoretical origin of procuratorial procuratorial work in China. The concept of this part is derived from deductive reasoning, and the business content is elaborated according to its own work practice as the basis of this article.
The second part of China's procuratorial supervision system operation state is analyzed, and the representative countries of the procuratorial supervision of foreign countries. Through the analysis of the United States, France, Japan, Russia, the procuratorial supervision system, in order to provide a useful way to solve the problem. China is the birthplace of modern public law the right of the United States as the representative of Anglo American legal system of prison supervision is exercised by the court in the form of procuratorial system in Russia and Japan on China's procuratorial system, the procuratorial system of Soviet influence is the most profound, from the four countries analyzed comparative representative. China's procuratorial supervision system, that in prison attorney office of China's procuratorial supervision should than extraterritorial inspection of procuratorial supervision in a certain extent can more effective supervision of prison supervision. But the illegal behavior It is not difficult to know that there are problems in the operation of the system.
The third part analyses the running situation of China's procuratorial supervision system, put forward China's prison supervision problems. Mainly discusses from two aspects: one is the old concept of the subjective aspect, including after the passive supervision of the vertical or harmonious supervision, and work in the form of other problems the objective is to places of detention; death investigation system is not perfect, lack of supervision of the procuratorial supervision and supervision system, legislative defects as the basic point is discussed.
The fourth part is put forward on the part of the problem is the perfect opinion, update the concept of procuratorial supervision, improve the working mechanism, the establishment of custody death investigation system, strengthen supervision, supervision of the procuratorial supervision legislation, both subjective and objective, the total grams of abuse of prison supervision.
Through combing the above problems, we hope to improve our procuratorial system and further improve the effectiveness of procuratorial work, so as to provide a useful reference for better protection of the lawful rights and interests of detainees.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D926.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 陳瑞華;汪貽飛;;檢察權(quán)監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制的域外考察[J];人民檢察;2008年05期

2 袁其國;;論刑罰執(zhí)行和監(jiān)管活動(dòng)監(jiān)督權(quán)的合理配置[J];人民檢察;2011年04期

3 何勤華;王思杰;;西方檢察權(quán)發(fā)展簡(jiǎn)論[J];人民檢察;2012年11期

4 臧榮華;;從對(duì)立式走向協(xié)作式的檢察監(jiān)督——基于檢察機(jī)關(guān)與被監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)間“交互工作機(jī)制”的分析[J];求實(shí);2013年02期

5 張智輝;法律監(jiān)督三辨析[J];中國法學(xué);2003年05期

6 韓成軍;;監(jiān)所檢察權(quán)優(yōu)化配置的路徑選擇[J];中國刑事法雜志;2011年05期

7 林勁松;;論羈押場(chǎng)所死因調(diào)查制度[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

本文編號(hào)：1370177