本文關(guān)鍵詞：論我國(guó)少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度之構(gòu)建　出處：《四川師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 少年 司法轉(zhuǎn)處 制度構(gòu)建 非犯罪化 非監(jiān)禁化

【摘要】：“司法轉(zhuǎn)處”這一術(shù)語(yǔ)在我國(guó)算是比較新的提法,當(dāng)前還沒有專門的論著,這方面的研究成果較少,較多見的成果是從國(guó)外的制度理念角度來探討的,論述制度建構(gòu)的也較少。因此,少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度在我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段還存在很大的研究空間和研究?jī)r(jià)值。有鑒于此,本文將立足少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度的構(gòu)建來探究犯罪少年脫離嚴(yán)厲、冗長(zhǎng)的正式刑事訴訟程序,以避免和減少正式的刑事司法程序給他們帶來的消極負(fù)面影響,從而保全他們重新回歸正常社會(huì)化軌道的機(jī)會(huì)。少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度是一整套制度,而非單個(gè)的具體措施,其適用范圍包括立案?jìng)刹殡A段、審查起訴階段、審判階段和執(zhí)行階段。本文將根據(jù)我國(guó)的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況,參照國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和借鑒國(guó)外的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),擬提出我國(guó)少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度的構(gòu)建設(shè)想。 具體說來,本文由五個(gè)部分構(gòu)成：第一部分：緒論。介紹本文的研究目的意義,研究方法以及國(guó)內(nèi)外文獻(xiàn)回溯；第二部分：少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度概述。此為論文的理論部分,主要界定了少年、少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度概念的定義、少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度產(chǎn)生理念及理論基礎(chǔ)、少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度基本特征等。第三部分：少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度國(guó)際準(zhǔn)則參照和域外經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒。以聯(lián)合國(guó)確立的少年司法制度國(guó)際準(zhǔn)則為參照為標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以美國(guó)、德國(guó)、英國(guó)少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度經(jīng)驗(yàn)為借鑒,為下文構(gòu)建我國(guó)少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度設(shè)想做鋪墊。第四部分：我國(guó)少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度實(shí)踐評(píng)析。立足于我國(guó)少年司法制度的現(xiàn)狀,從我國(guó)立法及司法兩大實(shí)踐方面進(jìn)行分析,對(duì)其不足之處進(jìn)行歸納總結(jié)；并在此基礎(chǔ)之上對(duì)其進(jìn)行分析論述尋找其產(chǎn)生的原因。第五部分：我國(guó)少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度的構(gòu)建設(shè)想。筆者認(rèn)為我國(guó)少年司法轉(zhuǎn)處制度的構(gòu)建應(yīng)遵循寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事政策和“教育、感化、挽救”方針,以“教育為主、懲罰為輔”為基本原則,盡量減少司法干預(yù)原則,貫徹全面調(diào)查原則,社會(huì)矯正幫教原則。在此基礎(chǔ)上,建立少年取保候?qū)徶贫�、�?shí)現(xiàn)附條件不起訴程序、提高緩刑適用率、擴(kuò)大假釋和監(jiān)外執(zhí)行的運(yùn)用,為保障制度更好施行還應(yīng)完善社區(qū)矯正制度。最后：結(jié)語(yǔ),總結(jié)全文。
[Abstract]:The term "judicial transfer" is a relatively new term in our country, but there are no special works at present. There are few research results in this field, and more achievements are discussed from the perspective of foreign institutional concepts. Therefore, the system of juvenile justice transfer in our country at the present stage there is still a lot of research space and research value. This article will be based on the juvenile justice transfer system to explore the juvenile delinquency from the harsh, lengthy formal criminal proceedings, in order to avoid and reduce the negative impact of the formal criminal justice process on them. The system of juvenile justice transfer is a whole system, not a single specific measure, its scope of application includes the stage of filing and investigation, the stage of examination and prosecution. According to the actual situation of our country, referring to the international standard and the practical experience of foreign countries, this article will put forward the tentative plan of constructing the system of juvenile justice transfer in our country. Specifically, this paper consists of five parts: the first part: introduction. The purpose of this paper, research methods and domestic and foreign literature backtracking; The second part: the introduction of juvenile justice transfer system. This is the theoretical part of the paper, mainly defines the concept of juvenile, juvenile justice transfer system, the concept and theoretical basis of juvenile justice transfer system. The third part: reference to the international standards of juvenile justice transfer system and foreign experience. The United Nations established the international standards of juvenile justice system as the reference standard, with the United States. Germany, the United Kingdom transfer of juvenile justice system for reference. For the following construction of juvenile justice transfer system assumption. 4th part: our country juvenile justice transfer system practice analysis. Based on the current situation of our juvenile justice system. From the legislative and judicial aspects of the practice of analysis, its shortcomings are summarized; On the basis of this, it is analyzed and discussed to find out the causes of its emergence. Part 5th:. The author thinks that the construction of juvenile justice transfer system in our country should follow the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity and "education". On the basis of the basic principle of "education first, punishment secondary", the principle of judicial intervention should be reduced as far as possible, the principle of comprehensive investigation should be implemented, and the principle of social correction, help and education should be implemented. The establishment of juvenile bail pending trial system, the realization of conditional non-prosecution procedures, improve the application rate of probation, expand parole and outside the implementation of the use, for the better implementation of the system should also improve the community correction system. Finally: conclusion. Summary of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 高潔;保釋制度的評(píng)析及借鑒[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

2 吳玉華;社區(qū)矯正工作初探[J];法學(xué)雜志;2003年05期

3 王順安,甄宏;試論我國(guó)未成年犯社區(qū)矯正項(xiàng)目體系之構(gòu)建[J];青少年犯罪問題;2005年01期

4 劉福謙;試論偵查階段對(duì)未成年犯罪嫌疑人的非監(jiān)禁化——以減少逮捕的適用為切入點(diǎn)[J];人民檢察;2004年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1367805