本文選題：法律信仰 + 對(duì)象　； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 我國(guó)正處于建設(shè)法治社會(huì)的初期,雖然我國(guó)的法治建設(shè)得到了一定程度的發(fā)展,但是我們也應(yīng)該看到法治建設(shè)中存在的很多亟待解決的問題。那么到底如何從本質(zhì)上解決這些問題,從而更快更好的實(shí)現(xiàn)法治社會(huì)這一長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo),就成為了人們關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。筆者認(rèn)為解決這些問題的關(guān)鍵是使人們形成以自然法為對(duì)象的法律信仰,只有當(dāng)人們從內(nèi)心上確信對(duì)自然法信仰,把自然法視為心靈的寄托,那么我國(guó)法治建設(shè)過程中所遇到的問題將會(huì)迎刃而解。 本論文共分為四章,第一章論述了法律信仰的來源:伯爾曼教授首先明確提出了對(duì)法律的信仰,筆者對(duì)其經(jīng)過分析后,認(rèn)為我國(guó)需要信仰;第二章總結(jié)論述了當(dāng)今學(xué)術(shù)界支持法律信仰的人們的觀點(diǎn),并對(duì)此觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了分析批判,從而為自然法成為法律信仰對(duì)象提供了支持。持此種觀點(diǎn)的人們之所以認(rèn)為法律可以被信仰是因?yàn)橐韵聨讉�(gè)原因:首先,我國(guó)缺失法律信仰的對(duì)象,從而造成了在法律信仰的危機(jī),其次,法律具有被信仰的特性,如法律具有人權(quán)性、救濟(jì)性、科學(xué)性,最后,法律信仰的形成有助于我國(guó)法治社會(huì)的建設(shè);筆者對(duì)以上的原因分別進(jìn)行了批判,如筆者認(rèn)為我國(guó)并不存在法律信仰對(duì)象缺失的問題,因而運(yùn)用相關(guān)的論證對(duì)此進(jìn)行了深刻的批判;第三章闡明了信仰的本質(zhì),也就是說若想成為信仰的對(duì)象,到底應(yīng)該具有怎樣的品質(zhì),從而為下文的論證奠定的了基礎(chǔ),之后,總結(jié)論述了反對(duì)法律信仰的人們的觀點(diǎn):一種觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為實(shí)證法不可以被信仰,理由為實(shí)證法具有世俗性、缺陷性、功利性、強(qiáng)制性,根本不符合信仰的品質(zhì),另一種觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為依據(jù)我國(guó)的法治現(xiàn)狀我們應(yīng)該信仰傳統(tǒng),信仰傳統(tǒng)更符合熟人社會(huì),人們不需要冰冷的法律,需要溫情。筆者在總結(jié)論述的同時(shí)加入自己的思考對(duì)其中的不妥之處進(jìn)行了深刻的批判。第四章從對(duì)以上兩種觀點(diǎn)的論述中證明自己的觀點(diǎn):法律可以被信仰,只不過所信仰的對(duì)象應(yīng)該是自然法。自然法信仰的形成應(yīng)借助實(shí)證法,即實(shí)證法是自然法的載體,最后的闡述了如何培養(yǎng)人們對(duì)自然法的信仰。 總之,對(duì)法律信仰對(duì)象重新解析,將會(huì)促使人們的進(jìn)一步思考,使法的信仰盡快形成。我們知道,在人類的漫長(zhǎng)旅途中,人們需要信仰,那么在法治社會(huì)的建設(shè)道路上人們同樣需要信仰,更確切地說人們需要自然法信仰。相信以自然法為對(duì)象的法律信仰普遍形成,將會(huì)滿足人們不斷追求的精神生活,將會(huì)有助于法治精神的傳播,將會(huì)有利于和諧社會(huì)的構(gòu)建,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)發(fā)達(dá)的法治社會(huì)!
[Abstract]:China is in the early stage of building a society ruled by law. Although the construction of the rule of law in our country has been developed to a certain extent, we should also see that there are many problems to be solved in the construction of the rule of law. So how to solve these problems from the essence, so as to achieve the long-term strategic goal of a society ruled by law faster and better, has become the focus of attention. The author thinks that the key to solve these problems is to make people form the legal belief of natural law. Only if people believe in natural law from the heart, regard natural law as the sustenance of the mind. Then the problems encountered in the construction of our country's rule of law will be solved. This thesis is divided into four chapters. The first chapter discusses the source of legal belief: professor Berman first clearly put forward the belief in law, the author thinks that our country needs faith after analyzing it; The second chapter summarizes and criticizes the views of the people who support the legal belief in the academic world, thus providing the support for the natural law to become the object of legal belief. People who hold this view believe that the law can be believed for the following reasons: first, the lack of the object of legal faith in our country, resulting in a crisis in legal faith, and secondly, the law has the characteristics of being believed in. If the law is human rights, relief, scientific, finally, the formation of legal beliefs is conducive to the construction of a society ruled by law. For example, the author thinks that there is no lack of the object of legal belief in our country, so he criticizes it deeply by using relevant argumentation. The third chapter clarifies the essence of belief, that is, if you want to be the object of belief, What kind of quality should it have, thus laying the foundation for the following argument, and then summarizing and discussing the views of those who oppose the legal belief: one view that positivistic law cannot be believed, the reason is that positivist law is secular, Defect, utilitarianism, compulsion, do not accord with the quality of belief at all. Another view is that according to the present situation of rule of law in our country, we should believe in tradition, belief tradition is more in line with acquaintance society, people do not need cold law, need warmth. While summing up the discussion, the author adds his own thinking to make a profound critique of the inappropriateness. The fourth chapter proves his view from the above two viewpoints: the law can be believed, but the object of belief should be natural law. The formation of belief in natural law should be based on positive law, that is, positive law is the carrier of natural law. Finally, it expounds how to cultivate people's belief in natural law. In a word, the reanalysis of the object of legal belief will urge people to think further and make the faith of law form as soon as possible. We know that in the long journey of human beings, people need faith, so people also need faith in the construction of a society ruled by law, and more precisely, people need faith in natural law. It is believed that the universal formation of legal belief in the object of natural law will satisfy the spiritual life that people are constantly pursuing, will help to spread the spirit of rule by law, will be conducive to the construction of a harmonious society, and will ultimately achieve the development of a society ruled by law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 劉焯;;“信仰法律”的提法有違法理[J];法學(xué);2006年06期

2 劉焯;民族的文化與現(xiàn)代中國(guó)法的精神[J];佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

3 張曉昀;;試論中西傳統(tǒng)法律信仰的差別[J];求實(shí);2006年S1期

4 李鐘書;法律的宗教性及其缺失對(duì)法律信仰的影響[J];求索;2004年07期

5 董長(zhǎng)海;王芹;;中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)法律信仰探析[J];陜西省行政學(xué)院.陜西省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

6 宿廣升;法律信仰——法治的精神支柱[J];行政與法;2005年04期

7 張永和;;法律不能被信仰的理由[J];政法論壇;2006年03期

8 王明亮;中國(guó)語境中的法律信仰[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年05期

9 葉傳星;法律信仰的內(nèi)在悖論[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2098083