本文選題：信托 + 遺囑信托��； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：遺囑信托是通過遺囑方式設(shè)立的信托，它與以契約方式設(shè)立的信托相區(qū)別。通過遺囑的形式設(shè)立信托而對身后財產(chǎn)做出理想的安排，使遺囑信托成為最具魅力的財產(chǎn)管理方式。本文以遺囑信托最為發(fā)達的英國為背景出發(fā)，從遺囑信托的基本理論、遺囑信托主體、遺囑信托客體三個方面入手，分別對一些重要而特征鮮明的法律問題進行研究，以期對我國移植和構(gòu)建完備的遺囑信托提供啟發(fā)和借鑒。本文共分三部分。 第一部分，，對遺囑信托基本法律問題進行概括分析，包括遺囑信托的起源和發(fā)展，遺囑信托的法律特征，遺囑信托的功能。遺囑信托的起源很難與信托的起源嚴格區(qū)分。遺囑信托是信托的一個子類型，除了具有自身特有之處，也有信托的一般法律特征。遺囑信托的功能符合現(xiàn)代人對財產(chǎn)保值增值的要求，是信托制度靈活和富有彈性的重要體現(xiàn)。 第二部分，對英國遺囑信托的主體進行研究。信托法律關(guān)系當事人中，委托人、受托人、受益人是最重要的三個角色。英國信托法實踐對這三個主體的權(quán)利義務(wù)科學(xué)配置是信托良好運行的基礎(chǔ)，本文對其主要的權(quán)利義務(wù)進行歸納和分析，以期取其精華。 第三部分，對英國遺囑信托的客體進行研究。信托客體，即信托財產(chǎn)，它集中了信托這一財產(chǎn)管理制度特色之所在。信托財產(chǎn)的獨立性和同一性是信托運行的核心。識別信托財產(chǎn)所有權(quán)歸屬對于保證信托有效進行并且在信托利益被違反時提供救濟是十分必要的。 第四部分，指出中國遺囑信托法律規(guī)定的不完善之處。對應(yīng)本文前三部分的內(nèi)容，首先在中國遺囑信托的價值和功能的重新定位上提出建議，其次指出中國遺囑信托法律關(guān)系主體權(quán)責(zé)不對稱之處，最后分析了遺囑信托財產(chǎn)所有權(quán)的真正歸屬并提出建議。 遺囑信托是以家庭財富的管理、傳承和保護為目的，實現(xiàn)財產(chǎn)跨代傳承和保值增值。得利于受人之托、代人理財?shù)男磐欣砟睿z囑信托法律制度在財富管理上具有諸多優(yōu)勢。目前中國遺囑信托的需求范圍不斷擴大，學(xué)習(xí)研究英國先進的法律制度構(gòu)造對我國當前具有重大的實踐價值和指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:Testamentary trust is a trust established by will, which is different from trust established by contract. By establishing trust in the form of will and making ideal arrangement of the property behind, the testamentary trust becomes the most attractive way of property management. Based on the background of England, where testamentary trust is the most developed country, starting with the basic theory of testamentary trust, the subject of testamentary trust and the object of testamentary trust, this paper studies some important and distinctive legal problems. In order to transplant and build a complete testamentary trust to provide inspiration and reference. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part analyzes the basic legal problems of testamentary trust, including the origin and development of testamentary trust, the legal characteristics of testamentary trust and the function of testamentary trust. It is difficult to distinguish the origin of testamentary trust from that of trust. Testamentary trust is a subtype of trust, which not only has its own unique features, but also has the general legal characteristics of trust. The function of testamentary trust accords with the requirement of property preservation and increment, and it is an important embodiment of the flexibility and flexibility of trust system. The second part studies the subject of testamentary trust in England. The trustor and beneficiary are the three most important roles in the trust legal relationship. The scientific allocation of the rights and obligations of the three subjects is the basis of the good operation of the trust in the practice of the British Trust Law. This paper sums up and analyzes its main rights and obligations in order to extract its essence. The third part studies the object of testamentary trust in England. The object of trust, that is, trust property, focuses on the characteristics of the property management system. The independence and identity of trust property are the core of trust operation. It is necessary to identify the ownership of the trust property in order to guarantee the trust to be effective and to provide relief if the trust interests are violated. The fourth part points out the imperfections of the law of testamentary trust in China. Corresponding to the contents of the first three parts of this paper, the author first puts forward some suggestions on the reorientation of the value and function of the testamentary trust in China, and then points out the asymmetry of the rights and responsibilities of the subject in the legal relationship of the testamentary trust in China. Finally, it analyzes the real ownership of testamentary trust property and puts forward some suggestions. Testamentary trust aims at the management, inheritance and protection of family wealth. The legal system of testamentary trust has many advantages in wealth management. At present, the scope of the demand for testamentary trust in China is expanding, so it is of great practical value and guiding significance to study and study the advanced legal system structure in Britain.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D956.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐衛(wèi);;羅馬遺產(chǎn)信托及其法學(xué)思考與啟示[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評論;2005年01期

2 董慧凝;;信托財產(chǎn)范圍的確定[J];廣東社會科學(xué);2012年05期

3 徐衛(wèi),查達來;論受托人的委托權(quán)——兼評我國《信托法》第30條[J];福建金融管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年03期

4 陳維峰;;淺析羅馬法的遺產(chǎn)信托[J];神州;2012年33期

5 孔志軍;;財富傳承:富豪家族信托解密[J];人民文摘;2013年07期

6 胡啟忠;我國受托人權(quán)力制度之思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年06期

7 李叢辰;;從羅馬法看我國遺產(chǎn)信托制度的構(gòu)建[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2010年12期

8 祁建;;從藝人遺產(chǎn)紛爭看遺產(chǎn)信托[J];中國信用卡;2008年11期

9 張平華;遺囑信托是克服繼承法缺陷的工具[J];煙臺大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年02期

10 王良國 ,張輝;英國信托制度述評[J];中國保險管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;1996年04期

本文編號：1941505