本文選題：“威逼人致死”條 + 淵源��； 參考：《中國政法大學》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 明清法律中的“威逼人致死”條(以下簡稱“威逼”條)頗有別于現(xiàn)代刑法理論,已有的相關研究往往將其作為素材使用以說明中國古代法律文化中某一方面,并大多局限于明清兩代。本文意打破明清兩代的局限,將對“威逼”條的研究向前推進至唐代,向后續(xù)寫《大清律例》之后的中國法律在后“威逼”條時代里的應對。因此,本文有意將明清以前對“威逼人致死”問題的法律應對,與明清律例中“威逼”條的確立、變遷及《大清律例》之后的法律應對貫通起來進行考察,以觀察“自殺肇因者須為其在自殺因果鏈中占有重要一環(huán)而付出相當代價”的觀念如何進入法律,并在清末及之后受到西方法律理論影響的中國近代法律中以另一種面貌繼續(xù)存在(亦即中國現(xiàn)行法律中的傳統(tǒng)因素)。本文的考察過程將側重于法律應對(立法例)的變遷。
[Abstract]:The "threatening death" clause in Ming and Qing laws (hereinafter referred to as "coercion") is quite different from the theory of modern criminal law. Relevant studies have often used it as material to illustrate one aspect of ancient Chinese legal culture. And mostly confined to the Ming and Qing dynasties. This paper aims to break the limitations of the Ming and Qing dynasties, to push forward the study of "coercion" into the Tang Dynasty, and to deal with the Chinese law in the post-" coercive "era after the later writing of the" Qing laws and regulations ". Therefore, this paper intends to examine the legal response to the problem of "threatening death" before the Ming and Qing dynasties, and the establishment, changes and laws after the "coercion" in the laws and regulations of the Ming and Qing dynasties. To see how the idea that the cause of suicide has to pay a considerable price in the chain of cause and effect of suicide is entered into law, And in the late Qing Dynasty and after the influence of western legal theory in modern Chinese law with another appearance (that is, the traditional factors in the current law of China). The investigation process of this paper will focus on the change of legal response (legislative example).
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D929

【引證文獻】

中國碩士學位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 曹景南;晚清民國墮胎罪立法的發(fā)展[D];中國社會科學院研究生院;2012年

，

本文編號：1931791