成本收益分析:基本理論與我國(guó)立法實(shí)踐
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-13 23:33
本文選題:法律經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué) + 政府立法; 參考:《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文
【摘要】: 法規(guī)是政府監(jiān)管權(quán)限的依據(jù)和來(lái)源,法規(guī)的質(zhì)量直接決定著政府監(jiān)管的時(shí)效性。因此,制定和頒布一項(xiàng)法規(guī),政府相關(guān)部門(mén)應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行分析評(píng)估,以證明出臺(tái)這項(xiàng)法規(guī)是必要的,法規(guī)所確立的特定制度是正當(dāng)?shù)?法規(guī)實(shí)施后所取得的效益是明顯的。成本收益分析是這種政府立法評(píng)估的最主要方法,是提高政府立法質(zhì)量的一種有效手段。成本收益分析將規(guī)章可能產(chǎn)生的收益和成本以貨幣化的形式表示,通過(guò)比較成本和收益的大小,來(lái)判斷規(guī)章的正當(dāng)性。這種定量分析方法明確了“公平正義”、“公共利益”的衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn),增加了政府立法過(guò)程的公開(kāi)性和透明度,改進(jìn)了立法技術(shù),提高了立法的時(shí)效性,彌補(bǔ)了制定法的滯后性、僵化性等局限,使政府的監(jiān)管行為始終具有時(shí)效性。. 本文從概述成本收益分析基本理論入手,結(jié)合具體案例,介紹了政府立法成本和收益的識(shí)別、核算方法,在此基礎(chǔ)上,針對(duì)我國(guó)政府立法過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題,詳細(xì)闡述了我國(guó)政府立法成本收益分析應(yīng)當(dāng)采取的模式,并對(duì)我國(guó)建立政府立法成本收益分析的長(zhǎng)效實(shí)施機(jī)制提出了建議。國(guó)務(wù)院法制部門(mén)應(yīng)當(dāng)總結(jié)立法后評(píng)估工作的經(jīng)驗(yàn)做法,修改政府立法的程序性規(guī)范,制定政府立法成本收益分析操作指引,使政府立法成本收益分析制度化、規(guī)范化,將成本收益分析方法貫穿于政府立法的全過(guò)程——立法前、立法中和立法后。要建立一套政府立法成本收益分析組織、協(xié)調(diào)、審查機(jī)構(gòu),避免政府立法成本收益分析流于形式,防止浪費(fèi)社會(huì)資源。
[Abstract]:Laws and regulations are the basis and source of government supervision authority. The quality of laws and regulations directly determines the timeliness of government supervision. Therefore, to formulate and promulgate a law, the relevant government departments should make an analysis and evaluation to prove that it is necessary to introduce this law, that the specific system established by the law is legitimate, and that the benefits obtained after the implementation of the law are obvious. Cost-benefit analysis is the most important method to evaluate government legislation and an effective means to improve the quality of government legislation. Cost-benefit analysis expresses the possible benefits and costs of regulations in the form of monetization, and judges the legitimacy of regulations by comparing the size of costs and benefits. This quantitative analysis method clarifies the measurement standards of "fairness and justice" and "public interest", increases the openness and transparency of the legislative process of the government, improves the legislative technology, improves the timeliness of legislation, and makes up for the lag in the formulation of laws. Inflexibility and other limitations, so that the government's regulatory behavior has always had timeliness. Starting with the basic theory of cost-benefit analysis and combining with specific cases, this paper introduces the identification and accounting methods of government legislation cost and income. On this basis, the paper aims at the problems existing in the process of government legislation in China. This paper expounds in detail the mode that should be adopted in the analysis of the cost and benefit of government legislation, and puts forward some suggestions for the establishment of a long-term implementation mechanism for the analysis of cost and benefit of government legislation. The legal department of the State Council should sum up the experience and practice of post-legislative evaluation, revise the procedural norms of government legislation, formulate operational guidelines for cost-benefit analysis of government legislation, and institutionalize and standardize the cost-benefit analysis of government legislation. Cost-benefit analysis method runs through the whole process of government legislation-before legislation, legislative neutralization and after legislation. It is necessary to set up a set of organizations for the analysis of government legislation cost and income, coordinate and examine the organization, avoid the government legislation cost and income analysis become a mere formality, and prevent the waste of social resources.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D920.0
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 汪軍花;;關(guān)于立法后評(píng)估的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];江淮法治;2008年22期
2 趙敏華;李國(guó)平;;效益轉(zhuǎn)移法評(píng)估石油開(kāi)發(fā)中跨區(qū)域環(huán)境價(jià)值損失的實(shí)證研究[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2006年10期
3 席濤;;監(jiān)管體制框架分析:國(guó)際比較與中國(guó)改革[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2007年03期
4 席濤;;歐盟監(jiān)管:一個(gè)制度性分析框架[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2006年09期
5 席濤;個(gè)人、企業(yè)、政府行為主體:經(jīng)濟(jì)分析的一個(gè)理論框架[J];人文雜志;2001年05期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 鄭赫南;[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2006年
,本文編號(hào):1885341
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/1885341.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著