本文選題：商標(biāo)　切入點：反向假冒　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：商標(biāo)反向假冒是指未經(jīng)商標(biāo)權(quán)人同意,擅自將他人合法貼附于商品上的商標(biāo)撤換或去除,然后將該商品投入市場的行為。我國對商標(biāo)反向假冒的研究源于1994年發(fā)生的“楓葉”訴“鱷魚”案。由于當(dāng)時法律對此沒有規(guī)定,法院在審理此類案件時陷入了無法可依的尷尬局面。2001年我國修訂《商標(biāo)法》后,首次明確了對商標(biāo)反向假冒行為的規(guī)制。但是由于新《商標(biāo)法》中有關(guān)商標(biāo)反向假冒的規(guī)定仍有不完善之處,相關(guān)法律對商標(biāo)反向假冒行為的規(guī)定也不健全,因此我國尚未建立一套較為完善的商標(biāo)反向假冒制度。美國是世界上反向假冒判例和理論最為發(fā)達(dá)的國家,其法院經(jīng)過一個世紀(jì)的與反向假冒的斗爭,目前已經(jīng)形成了較為完善的商標(biāo)反向假冒制度。研究美國商標(biāo)法中的反向假冒制度,尤其是商標(biāo)反向假冒的判例發(fā)展和理論發(fā)展,并從中總結(jié)和借鑒有益的經(jīng)驗,對于完善我國商標(biāo)反向假冒制度具有重要的意義。 本文共分為四部分:第一部分為商標(biāo)反向假冒概述。該部分以美國法視角為主,介紹了商標(biāo)反向假冒的基本概念,表現(xiàn)形式及其起源,作為以下研究美國商標(biāo)反向假冒制度的基礎(chǔ);第二部分為美國商標(biāo)反向假冒的判例發(fā)展。該部分通過三則標(biāo)志性案例以及若干輔助案例,詳細(xì)介紹了美國商標(biāo)反向假冒判例的早期發(fā)展,完善形成以及最新發(fā)展等三個重要階段,并且通過對標(biāo)志性案例的評析,總結(jié)出美國商標(biāo)反向假冒的司法實踐啟示;第三部分為美國商標(biāo)反向假冒的理論發(fā)展。該部分從商標(biāo)反向假冒的理論基礎(chǔ)出發(fā),重點分析了商標(biāo)反向假冒行為的構(gòu)成要件和法律性質(zhì),并在此基礎(chǔ)上對美國商標(biāo)反向假冒的立法規(guī)制進(jìn)行研究;第四部分為美國商標(biāo)反向假冒制度對我國的借鑒意義。該部分首先介紹了我國商標(biāo)反向假冒的立法現(xiàn)狀,隨后對我國商標(biāo)反向假冒立法和司法實踐中存在的問題進(jìn)行了分析,最后提出我國應(yīng)借鑒美國商標(biāo)反向假冒制度中的有益經(jīng)驗,以完善我國商標(biāo)反向假冒制度的一些粗淺建議。 本文較為系統(tǒng)地考察了美國商標(biāo)法中的反向假冒制度,詳細(xì)梳理了其判例發(fā)展的三個重要階段并且深入分析了其理論發(fā)展中的重要問題,最后指出我國商標(biāo)反向假冒立法和司法實踐中存在的問題,并提出了一些完善建議,以期對我國商標(biāo)反向假冒制度的建立健全貢獻(xiàn)出自己的微薄之力。
[Abstract]:Reverse counterfeiting of a trademark refers to the removal or removal of a trademark lawfully affixed to a commodity by another person without the consent of the trademark owner, Our country's research on reverse counterfeiting of trademark originates from the case of Maple Leaf v. Crocodile in 1994. When the court tried such cases, it was in an awkward situation that could not be followed. After China amended the Trademark Law in 2001, For the first time, the regulation of trademark reverse passing-off is clarified. However, as the provisions on trademark reverse passing-off in the new Trademark Law are still imperfect, the relevant laws also have imperfect provisions on trademark reverse passing-off. Therefore, China has not yet established a relatively complete system of reverse counterfeiting of trademarks. The United States is the most developed country in the world in cases and theories of reverse counterfeiting, and its courts have struggled with reverse counterfeiting for a century. At present, a relatively perfect trademark reverse passing off system has been formed. This paper studies the reverse passing off system in the trademark law of the United States, especially the development of the case law and the theoretical development of trademark reverse impersonation, and sums up and draws useful experience from it. It is of great significance to perfect the reverse counterfeiting system of trademark in our country. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of trademark reverse impersonation. As the basis of the following research on the reverse counterfeiting system in the United States; the second part is the development of the case of reverse counterfeiting in the United States. This part adopts three iconic cases as well as a number of supplementary cases. This paper introduces in detail the three important stages of American trademark reverse counterfeiting case, such as the early development, the perfect formation and the latest development, and summarizes the judicial enlightenment of the American trademark reverse counterfeiting through the analysis of the iconic cases. The third part is the theoretical development of trademark reverse impersonation in the United States. This part, based on the theoretical basis of trademark reverse passing-off, focuses on the analysis of the constitutive requirements and legal nature of trademark reverse passing-off. On the basis of this, the legislative regulation of trademark reverse passing-off in the United States is studied. The 4th part is the reference meaning of American trademark reverse passing off system to our country. This part first introduces the legislation status quo of trademark reverse passing off in our country. Then it analyzes the problems existing in the legislation and judicial practice of trademark reverse impersonation in our country, and finally puts forward that our country should draw lessons from the beneficial experience of American trademark reverse impersonation system in order to perfect the trademark reverse impersonation system of our country. This paper systematically investigates the reverse counterfeiting system in the trademark law of the United States, combs the three important stages of the development of its jurisprudence and analyzes the important problems in the development of its theory. Finally, this paper points out the problems existing in the legislation and judicial practice of trademark reverse counterfeiting in China, and puts forward some suggestions to improve the establishment and perfection of trademark reverse passing-off system in order to contribute to the establishment and perfection of trademark reverse passing-off system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：DD913;D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 何俐;反不正當(dāng)競爭法對商標(biāo)權(quán)的保護(hù)[J];中華商標(biāo);2003年04期

2 王玫;反向假冒不可濫用——美國商標(biāo)法中的反向假冒原則最新發(fā)展[J];中華商標(biāo);2004年04期

3 孫昊亮,鄭艷馨;論新《商標(biāo)法》修正案中的商標(biāo)反向假冒問題[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年08期

4 劉寧;試論商標(biāo)反向假冒行為的違法性[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年02期

5 王太平;;美國Dastar案:區(qū)分商標(biāo)與著作權(quán)法,捍衛(wèi)公共領(lǐng)域[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年02期

6 胡云紅,韓龍;商標(biāo)反向假冒探析[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2001年06期

7 黃勤南,段廣平;反向假冒商標(biāo)行為法律研究[J];政法論壇;1999年01期

8 鄭成思;;淺議《反不正當(dāng)競爭法》與《商標(biāo)法》的交叉與重疊[J];中國專利與商標(biāo);1998年04期

9 袁曉東 ,李曉桃;美國商標(biāo)法中的反向假冒理論[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2000年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 于澤華;論商標(biāo)反向假冒[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

2 陳凡;反向假冒之研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1574473