【摘要】：[目的]了解強(qiáng)制戒毒所基層干警的工作倦怠情況,探究干警工作倦怠與安全感及工作-家庭沖突的關(guān)系。[方法]采用工作倦怠量表、安全感量表、工作-家庭沖突量表,對(duì)云南紅河州強(qiáng)制戒毒所基層干警按倒班時(shí)間分三次進(jìn)行隨機(jī)抽樣調(diào)查,共調(diào)查72名干警,收回有效問卷68份,有效率為94%。工作倦怠量表有三個(gè)維度(情緒耗竭、去個(gè)性化、職業(yè)效能);安全感量表有兩個(gè)維度(人際安全感和確定控制感);工作-家庭沖突量表有兩個(gè)分量表(工作干擾家庭分量表和家庭干擾工作分量表),每個(gè)分量表各有三個(gè)維度(行為方式、心理資源、情緒情感)。以性別為自變量,對(duì)工作倦怠、安全感、工作-家庭沖突各維度進(jìn)行獨(dú)立樣本t檢驗(yàn);對(duì)工作倦怠與安全感、工作-家庭沖突的相關(guān)性進(jìn)行分析;以工作倦怠為因變量,人際安全感、確定安全感、工作干擾家庭、家庭干擾工作四個(gè)因子為自變量,進(jìn)行多元逐步回歸分析。[結(jié)果]38.2%、17.7%和14.7%的干警分別處于輕度、中度和重度倦怠,其余干警處于正常水平。干警人際安全感得分為3.4±0.8,確定控制感得分為3.1±0.9。工作-家庭沖突量表中,工作干擾家庭量表得分為2.3±0.7,干擾程度較重;家庭干擾工作量表得分1.5±0.5,干擾程度相對(duì)較輕。男警在工作倦怠量表的情緒耗竭維度得分以及工作-家庭沖突量表得分上均高于女警,在工作倦怠量表的職業(yè)效能維度上得分低于女警(P0.05)。安全感量表中人際安全感得分越高,則情緒耗竭得分越低(r=-0.26,P0.05)、去個(gè)性化得分越低(r=-0.39,P0.01)、職業(yè)效能得分越高(r=0.45,P0.01);安全感量表中的確定控制感得分越高,則去個(gè)性化得分越低(r=-0.32,P0.01),職業(yè)效能得分越高(r=0.34,P0.01)。工作-家庭沖突量表中的工作干擾家庭分量表和家庭干擾工作分量表的得分越高,則情緒耗竭得分均越高,去個(gè)性化得分均越高,職業(yè)效能得分均越低(均P0.05或P0.01)。工作干擾家庭和人際安全感對(duì)于工作倦怠的回歸方程為:工作倦怠=40.706+0.498×工作干擾家庭-4.726×人際安全感(F=23.2,P0.001,R2=0.424),工作倦怠差異的42.4%可由工作干擾家庭和人際安全感的變化來解釋。[結(jié)論]戒毒所基層干警普遍存在工作倦怠,男警的工作倦怠程度高于女警。人際安全感低、工作干擾家庭程度高會(huì)加劇干警的工作倦怠。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the relationship between job burnout and sense of security and work-family conflict. [methods] using job burnout scale, sense of security scale, work-family conflict scale, we investigated 72 policemen in Honghe compulsory Drug treatment Center in Yunnan Province. 68 valid questionnaires were collected and the effective rate was 94. Job burnout scale has three dimensions (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, Job efficacy); sense of security scale has two dimensions (interpersonal sense of security and deterministic sense of control); work-family conflict scale has two subscales (work interference family component and family interference work component), each subscale has There are three dimensions (behavior patterns, Psychological resources, emotions) Using sex as independent variable, the independent t-test was performed on the dimensions of job burnout, sense of security, work-family conflict; the correlation between job burnout and sense of security, work-family conflict was analyzed; and the dependent variable was job burnout. The factors of sense of security, work interfering family and family interference were determined as independent variables, and multivariate stepwise regression analysis was carried out. [results] 38.2% and 14.7% of the policemen were in mild, moderate and severe burnout, while the rest were at normal level. The interpersonal sense of security score of police officers was 3.4 鹵0.8, and the control sense score was 3.1 鹵0.9. In the work-family conflict scale, the score of work-family disturbance scale was 2.3 鹵0.7, the degree of interference was serious, and the score of family interference workload table was 1.5 鹵0.5, the degree of interference was relatively light. The scores of emotional exhaustion dimension and work-family conflict scale of male policemen were higher than that of female policemen, and the scores of job burnout scale were lower than that of female policemen (P0.05). The higher the interpersonal sense of security score in sense of security scale, the lower the score of emotional exhaustion (r-0.26), the lower the score of depersonalization (r-0.39, P0.01), the higher the score of professional efficacy (r 0.45, P0.01), the higher the score of deterministic control in sense of security scale, the higher the score of deterministic control in sense of security scale, the lower the score of depersonalization (r-0.39, P0.01), and the higher the score of professional efficacy (P 0.01). The lower the score of depersonalization (r-0.32, P0.01), the higher the score of professional efficacy (RV 0.34, P0.01). The higher the score of work-family conflict scale, the higher the score of emotional exhaustion, the higher the score of depersonalization and the lower the score of occupational efficacy (P0.05 or P0.01). The regression equation for job burnout between job disturbance family and interpersonal sense of security was: job burnout = 40.706 0.498 脳 job interference family-4.726 脳 interpersonal sense of security (F23.2P0.001R20.424). 42.4% of the difference in job burnout could be explained by the changes of job disturbance family and interpersonal sense of security. [conclusion] Job burnout is common in primary police officers in drug treatment centers, and the degree of job burnout of male policemen is higher than that of female policemen. Low interpersonal sense of security and high degree of interference with family may exacerbate job burnout.
【作者單位】： 內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)教育科學(xué)學(xué)院;紅河學(xué)院教師教育學(xué)院;重慶文理學(xué)院教育學(xué)院;
【基金】：2014年云南省艾滋病防治創(chuàng)新項(xiàng)目(無編號(hào))
【分類號(hào)】：D631.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 云祥;;警察工作倦怠研究綜述[J];上海公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

2 云祥;;警察工作倦怠研究綜述[J];武漢公安干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

3 鞏振興;;警察工作倦怠及其干預(yù)[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

4 周志濤;;警察工作倦怠的分類干預(yù)策略[J];公安研究;2009年04期

5 胡世群;;警察工作倦怠現(xiàn)狀研究[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

6 李永鑫,李懷玉;警察工作倦怠及其干預(yù)[J];鐵道警官高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

7 張艷;;國內(nèi)外警察工作倦怠感研究綜述[J];江西公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

8 張艷;;人口統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)變量與警察工作倦怠的關(guān)系研究——以江西省為例[J];江西公安專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

9 王存文;殳堯;;公安警察工作倦怠與人格、控制源的關(guān)系[J];中南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年S1期

10 胡世群;;警察工作倦怠及其緩解措施[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 譚紹珍;;個(gè)體-組織主觀匹配對(duì)戒毒警察工作倦怠影響的研究[A];第十一屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2007年

2 張姝s，

本文編號(hào)：2291610