本文選題：保安處分 + 勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)��； 參考：《江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 保安處分制度是西方現(xiàn)代刑法理論的產(chǎn)物,它既是一種刑罰理論,也是一種刑法制度。它的產(chǎn)生是近代刑法思想發(fā)展演變的直接結(jié)果,其理論價(jià)值和所發(fā)揮的防衛(wèi)社會(huì)的實(shí)際作用不容否認(rèn)。保安處分作為刑法的一種救濟(jì)措施,有其獨(dú)立的特征,即保安處分的對(duì)象具有特殊性,保安處分具有救濟(jì)性,處分的前置性及不定期性。其法理定性,在資產(chǎn)階級(jí)刑法理論中,一直存在一元論與二元論之爭。保安處分的適用原則,包括處分法定原則,處分必要性原則和處分相當(dāng)性原則。 勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng),是對(duì)有違法行為或有輕微犯罪行為,但尚不夠刑事處罰的人實(shí)行強(qiáng)制性改造的行政措施。它在我國實(shí)施50余年的歷史證明,這項(xiàng)制度的存在有其合理性和必要性。它在教育、挽救違法犯罪人員,維護(hù)社會(huì)治安方面發(fā)揮了重要的作用。但是由于勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)立法滯后,程序化的欠缺等方面的缺陷,導(dǎo)致勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度在實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)了許多問題。而要解決這些問題,惟有將勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)保安處分化,即勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)保安處分化有其必要性,亦即勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)保安處分化是克服勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度本身缺陷的必要性選擇。 勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)保安處分化不僅必要,而且可行。其可行性具體體現(xiàn)在以下幾個(gè)方面:(1)保安處分自身存在的合理性和先進(jìn)性;(2)保安處分可以替代勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)的功能;(3)保安處分在我國現(xiàn)有的法律體系中具有可操作性。 基于上述考慮,筆者從宏觀和微觀方面提出了勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)保安處分化的立法構(gòu)想。具體為:(1)宏觀方面,以勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)立法為契機(jī),先將其中涉及限制人身自由的一些措施、處分統(tǒng)一起來,建立強(qiáng)制教養(yǎng)處分制度,定性為刑事性保安處分單行法,等到時(shí)機(jī)成熟再制定一部統(tǒng)一的保安處分法典。(2)微觀方面,具體包括強(qiáng)制教養(yǎng)處分的適用條件、適用對(duì)象和適用范圍;強(qiáng)制教養(yǎng)處分的適用程序:強(qiáng)制教養(yǎng)處分的期限;強(qiáng)制教養(yǎng)處分的執(zhí)行。
[Abstract]:Security measure system is the product of western modern criminal law theory, it is not only a penalty theory, but also a criminal law system. Its emergence is the direct result of the development and evolution of the thought of modern criminal law, and its theoretical value and the actual function of the defense society can not be denied. As a remedy measure of criminal law, security measure has its own characteristics, that is, the object of security measure has particularity, the security measure has relief nature, and the disposition is prefixed and irregular. In the theory of bourgeois criminal law, there has always been a dispute between monism and dualism. The applicable principles of security measures include the principle of legal disposition, the principle of necessity of disposition and the principle of equivalent disposition. Reeducation through labor is an administrative measure to carry out compulsory reformation to the person who has illegal act or minor crime but not enough criminal punishment. It has been practiced in China for more than 50 years and proved that the existence of this system is reasonable and necessary. It plays an important role in education, saving criminals and maintaining public order. However, there are many problems in the practice of the reeducation through labor system due to the shortcomings of the legislation of reeducation through labor and the lack of procedure. In order to solve these problems, it is necessary to divide the security branch of reeducation through labor, that is, the division of security branch of reeducation through labor is the necessary choice to overcome the defects of the system of reeducation through labor. Reeducation through labor security division is not only necessary, but also feasible. Its feasibility is embodied in the following several aspects: 1) the rationality and advanced nature of the existence of security measures. (2) Security measures can replace the function of reeducation through labor. 3) Security measures are operable in the existing legal system of our country. Based on the above considerations, the author puts forward the legislative conception of the division of reeducation through labor security service from macro and micro aspects. Specifically, in the macro aspect, taking legislation on re-education through labor as a turning point, first unifying the measures involved in restricting personal freedom, establishing a system of compulsory correctional measures, characterizing it as a criminal law on security measures. Wait until the time is ripe to formulate a unified code of security measures. 2) microscopic aspects, including the applicable conditions of compulsory correctional punishment, the applicable object and scope, the applicable procedure of compulsory correctional punishment: the time limit of compulsory correctional punishment; Enforcement of compulsory correctional sanctions
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D926.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 張昕航,何艷明;《違法行為教育矯治法》立法中必須審慎處理的幾個(gè)問題[J];中國司法;2005年08期

2 陳瑞華;警察權(quán)的司法控制——以勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)為范例的分析[J];法學(xué);2001年06期

3 陳興良;勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng):根據(jù)國際人權(quán)公約之分析[J];法學(xué);2001年10期

4 衣永才,王毓忠,張彤;對(duì)勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)期限的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];人民公安;1999年23期

5 高文英;對(duì)我國現(xiàn)行勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的幾點(diǎn)反思[J];人民公安;2001年21期

6 陳衛(wèi)東,石獻(xiàn)智;警察權(quán)的配置原則及其控制——基于治安行政管理和刑事訴訟的視角[J];山東公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

7 鮮鐵可;;格拉馬蒂卡及其《社會(huì)防衛(wèi)原理》[J];中國法學(xué);1993年04期

8 劉中發(fā);澳門刑法中的保安處分制度述評(píng)[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1800931