日本對過勞死的法律救濟(jì)與預(yù)防
[Abstract]:In recent years, the report of the relevant "overwork" of our country is at the news end, and it can be seen that the degree of harm is not allowed to be small. However, there is no relevant content of the "overwork" in the law, so there is no way to define the "overwork", and there is no way to evaluate whether the dead worker in these cases is a "overwork", and there is no way to legally remedy the "overwork". In contrast, there has been a relatively long history of overwork in Japan, which has been a relatively long history in the study of overwork, mainly from the work-related injury insurance law and the civil law to the legal relief of overwork, and also a lot of research and exploration on how to prevent overwork. On the basis of the definition of the concept of overwork and the legal nature of overwork, the Japanese law provides a theoretical basis for the legal relief of overwork. According to the concept of overwork, the overwork can be divided into "The heavy load on the work results in the death of the brain and the heart." and "The strong mental load caused by the work causes a mental illness to die.". Both of these are corresponding to the "The business of brain and heart disease." and the "The business of mental illness." in the labor disaster insurance compensation method. First of all, it is necessary to study how these two parts are identified as labor disasters, and then to study the corresponding labor disaster compensation benefits. Secondly, the relief of overwork in civil law is introduced. In Japan, the compensation for labor disaster insurance and civil damages is a supplementary model (the worker can apply for the compensation of the worker's disaster insurance), and the civil damages for civil action may be filed. However, that final compensation or compensation cannot exceed the actual damage to which it is actually subject. in which the liability for damages for tort damages or the liability for damages for breach of contract is involved in the request of the employer for damages, and there is also a question of the deduction of the insurance benefits in the liability of civil damages, The relevant practice in the Japanese law is of reference value to the application of industrial injury insurance and civil compensation in the practice of our country. In the prevention of overwork and death, the activities of the "Over-work death 110", "The over-the-death family will" and other organizations of the Japanese civil society play an important role in the prevention of overwork and the like, and actively promoted the development of the relevant laws of overwork and death. Under the promotion of the folk power, the Promotion Law of the Prevention of Overwork and the like implemented in 2014 is a special labor-related legislation designed to prevent overwork, and through the analysis of the actual present situation and relevant research on the death of overwork, It is committed to the development of policies to prevent overwork and to take corresponding preventive measures. The Law on Occupational Safety and Health is a law regulating the management of labor safety, including relevant legislative provisions on the prevention of overwork. In 2005, it has been amended and the employer's obligation to arrange for a long-time working worker (as applied) and a physician must be arranged. In this paper, through the introduction of the legal relief and prevention of overwork in Japan, it is hoped that we can sum up the experience and realize the work-related injury identification and relief of the "overwork" workers, but the most important is to prevent the appearance of the "overwork" and guarantee the physical and mental health of the workers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D931.3;DD912.5
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊河清;王欣;;過勞問題研究的路徑與動(dòng)向[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2015年08期
2 周慧琳;;論“過勞死”的法律性質(zhì)及救濟(jì)途徑[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年19期
3 田思路;賈秀芬;;日本“過勞死”和“過勞自殺”的認(rèn)定基準(zhǔn)與啟示[J];中國人力資源開發(fā);2014年19期
4 郭曉宏;;日本“過勞死”工傷認(rèn)定的立法及啟示[J];中國人力資源開發(fā);2014年19期
5 于欣華;;工傷保險(xiǎn)到底保護(hù)誰[J];現(xiàn)代職業(yè)安全;2013年11期
6 鄭曉珊;;日本過勞自殺工傷規(guī)制之借鏡 從富士康事件談起[J];中外法學(xué);2013年02期
7 李菁鳳;;“過勞死”法律探討[J];湖南醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期
8 孫國平;;“過勞死”的比較法思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年01期
9 董保華;;論非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2008年07期
10 毛清芳;張桂芝;;工傷的法律救濟(jì)制度研究——中國工傷保險(xiǎn)制度的發(fā)展與完善[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 吳迪;日本學(xué)者“過勞”問題研究述評[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2013年
2 金劍;中日工傷保險(xiǎn)制度比較研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2013年
3 汪飛;“過勞死”的法律規(guī)制研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2008年
,本文編號:2512728
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2512728.html