法律轉(zhuǎn)型期司法引導社會變革的限度——以民國初年大理院判解中的人格平等為重心
發(fā)布時間:2019-01-07 08:40
【摘要】:在民國初年法律轉(zhuǎn)型期,大理院在展現(xiàn)司法引導社會變革之可能的同時,也展現(xiàn)了司法引導社會變革的剛性條件。民國初年大理院在司法兼營立法的實踐中,其所引導的從尊卑貴賤到人格平等的變革,不僅受制于民初的經(jīng)濟政治文化條件,受制于法源位階的剛性約束,也受社會共識、司法權(quán)威以及司法實效等動力因素的制約。當下中國全面推進依法治國的實踐,旨在變革傳統(tǒng)中的反法治基因,其難度并不亞于民初對尊卑貴賤傳統(tǒng)的變革。針對司法引導社會變革的這一當代語境,回顧民國初年大理院的實踐不無借鑒參考意義。
[Abstract]:In the legal transition period of the early Republic of China, Dali College not only showed the possibility of judicial guidance social change, but also showed the rigid conditions of judicial guidance social change. In the practice of concurrently managing judicial legislation in the early years of the Republic of China, Dali Institute guided the transformation from superiority and inferiority to the equality of personality, which was not only restricted by the economic, political and cultural conditions in the early Republic of China, but also by the rigid constraints of the legal source rank, as well as by social consensus. Judicial authority and judicial effectiveness and other dynamic factors constraints. At present, the practice of comprehensively promoting the rule of law in China aims at reforming the anti-rule of law gene in the tradition, which is no less difficult than the transformation of the tradition of superiority and inferiority at the beginning of the Republic of China. In view of the contemporary context of judicial leading social change, it is of reference significance to review the practice of Dali Institute in the early Republic of China.
【作者單位】: 河南工業(yè)大學法學院;
【基金】:2011年國家社科基金重點項目(11AZD044) 2015年河南工業(yè)大學高層次人才科研啟動基金項目(2015SBS016)
【分類號】:D929
本文編號:2403461
[Abstract]:In the legal transition period of the early Republic of China, Dali College not only showed the possibility of judicial guidance social change, but also showed the rigid conditions of judicial guidance social change. In the practice of concurrently managing judicial legislation in the early years of the Republic of China, Dali Institute guided the transformation from superiority and inferiority to the equality of personality, which was not only restricted by the economic, political and cultural conditions in the early Republic of China, but also by the rigid constraints of the legal source rank, as well as by social consensus. Judicial authority and judicial effectiveness and other dynamic factors constraints. At present, the practice of comprehensively promoting the rule of law in China aims at reforming the anti-rule of law gene in the tradition, which is no less difficult than the transformation of the tradition of superiority and inferiority at the beginning of the Republic of China. In view of the contemporary context of judicial leading social change, it is of reference significance to review the practice of Dali Institute in the early Republic of China.
【作者單位】: 河南工業(yè)大學法學院;
【基金】:2011年國家社科基金重點項目(11AZD044) 2015年河南工業(yè)大學高層次人才科研啟動基金項目(2015SBS016)
【分類號】:D929
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 劉東升;;法律的人文屬性論略[J];理論界;2007年05期
2 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 尹衛(wèi)國;請珍愛自己的膝蓋[N];中國社會報;2011年
,本文編號:2403461
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2403461.html