【摘要】：著名法學(xué)家耶林說(shuō)道,法律與道德的關(guān)系問(wèn)題是法學(xué)中的好望角;那些法律航海者只要能夠征服其中的危險(xiǎn),就再無(wú)遭受滅頂之災(zāi)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)了。法律與道德的關(guān)系不僅是一個(gè)重大的法哲學(xué)理論問(wèn)題,也是關(guān)于社會(huì)治理的重大實(shí)踐問(wèn)題。隨著社會(huì)生活的日益豐富多彩,法律與道德的關(guān)系也更加復(fù)雜化,在處理法律與道德的關(guān)系方面,給法律人提出了更高的要求。 法院是法律帝國(guó)的首都,法官是帝國(guó)的王侯。法律是維護(hù)正義的最后屏障,法官作為法律的運(yùn)用者,能否處理好法律與道德的關(guān)系,將直接影響到一些案件的處理,尤其是摻雜道德因素案件的處理。如何處理?yè)诫s道德因素的案件,也成為法官所必須要解決的問(wèn)題。筆者在此試從彭宇案出發(fā),闡述法官在處理彭宇案時(shí)存在的錯(cuò)誤,并對(duì)如何處理?yè)诫s諸多道德因素的案件提出一些建議。本文分為三個(gè)部分: 第一部分是彭宇案的概述,介紹了法院的判決結(jié)果、判決理由、案件的媒體報(bào)道情況、案件的評(píng)價(jià)以及產(chǎn)生的社會(huì)影響。 第二部分是在案件事實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)上,從四個(gè)方面闡述彭宇案中存在的錯(cuò)誤,一是道德基礎(chǔ)——偏離公正;二是法律運(yùn)用的失當(dāng);三是本案中法律與道德的關(guān)系;四是法官?zèng)]有使正義得到維護(hù)。 第三部分是對(duì)彭宇案的反思,闡明道德因素對(duì)法官裁決的影響,認(rèn)為法官要維護(hù)正義,就應(yīng)該服從法律,遵守法律規(guī)定,減少道德的考量。
[Abstract]:The famous jurist Yering said that the relationship between law and morality is the corner of good faith in law; those who are legal navigators are no longer at risk of extinction as long as they can conquer the dangers. The relationship between law and morality is not only a major theoretical issue of legal philosophy, but also a major practical issue of social governance. With the increasingly rich and colorful social life, the relationship between law and morality is becoming more complicated. In dealing with the relationship between law and morality, a higher requirement is put forward to the legal person. The court is the capital of the legal empire, and the judge is the king of the empire. Law is the last barrier to maintain justice. Judge, as the user of law, can deal with the relationship between law and morality, which will directly affect the handling of some cases, especially the cases with mixed moral factors. How to deal with cases involving moral factors has also become a problem that judges must solve. Starting from Peng Yu's case, the author expounds the mistakes of the judge in dealing with Peng Yu's case, and puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the cases with many moral factors. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part is an overview of the case of Peng Yu, including the court's decision, the reasons for the judgment, the media report of the case, the evaluation of the case and its social impact. The second part is based on the facts of the case, from four aspects to explain the errors in Peng Yu case, one is the moral basis-deviating from justice, the other is the misapplication of the law, the third is the relationship between law and morality in this case; Fourth, the judge failed to uphold justice. The third part is the reflection of Peng Yu's case, expounding the influence of moral factors on judge's ruling, holding that if judges want to maintain justice, they should obey the law, abide by the law, and reduce the moral considerations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D90-05;D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 周量;;解讀“彭宇案”判決理由——以證據(jù)規(guī)則和民事訴訟理論為視角[J];東方法學(xué);2008年05期

2 付建平;法官判決中的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性因素[J];法學(xué);2001年03期

3 朱漢;;從“彭宇案”看輿論監(jiān)督與司法公正之間的關(guān)系[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2009年04期

4 徐炳煊;;試論民事訴訟中法官釋明權(quán)的行使和完善[J];求實(shí);2006年S3期

5 劉作翔;法律與道德:中國(guó)法治進(jìn)程中的難解之題——對(duì)法律與道德關(guān)系的再追問(wèn)和再思考[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;1998年01期

6 陳令華,田成有;法信仰:中國(guó)法律的困境與出路[J];思想戰(zhàn)線;1998年S1期

7 劉國(guó)棟,袁燕;關(guān)于完善我國(guó)法官體制的思考[J];武警工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年05期

8 徐良梅,韓國(guó)文;法律與道德的關(guān)系在法治社會(huì)中的體現(xiàn)[J];武漢水利電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年03期

9 本刊編輯部;;2007年十大道德事件盤(pán)點(diǎn)[J];政工研究動(dòng)態(tài);2007年24期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 張悅;[N];南方周末;2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2343391