【摘要】：基于當前中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛愈演愈烈的態(tài)勢,本文通過比較分析的方法,對中美兩國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護體系進行對比分析,結(jié)合歷史上中美幾次關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)方面的糾紛及現(xiàn)階段中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛的特點和發(fā)展趨勢,總結(jié)出糾紛產(chǎn)生的原因,并就如何避免或減少糾紛提出相應(yīng)的對策建議,本文共分為五部分： 第一部分為緒論部分,主要介紹文章的選題背景與意義、論文的寫作思路與基本結(jié)構(gòu)以及論文的創(chuàng)新點與不足。 第二部分為文獻綜述部分,從三個層面對國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀進行描述。首先對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)基本概念加以闡述,其次分析中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛產(chǎn)生的原因,最后針對如何避免或減少糾紛的策略選擇。 第三部分介紹了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的特征。簡單地說,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)具有無形性、專有性、時間性、地域性和可復(fù)制性的特點。中美兩國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護體系以及兩者之間的對比,主要是在法律保護和行政保護兩個層面上加以說明。 第四部分為文章的核心部分。首先介紹了中美歷史上三次關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)方面的糾紛,總結(jié)了現(xiàn)階段中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)方面糾紛的特點及發(fā)展趨勢。其次對糾紛產(chǎn)生原因加以分析。本文總結(jié)了五個方面：1.中美雙方經(jīng)濟利益的角逐；2.貿(mào)易保護主義的抬頭：3.中美雙邊貿(mào)易不平衡的加劇及經(jīng)貿(mào)關(guān)系的不對等；4.中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)體制差異；5.中美雙方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化上的差異。 第五部分針對如何避免或減少糾紛提出相應(yīng)的策略建議。首先要完善知識產(chǎn)權(quán)相關(guān)法律機制,包括立法和執(zhí)法兩個方面。其次是利用多種爭端解決機制具體包括1.援用TRIPS協(xié)議和世貿(mào)組織爭端解決機制；2.積極推動建立中美雙邊協(xié)調(diào)機制；3.充分發(fā)揮民間外交優(yōu)勢。最后要加強對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的創(chuàng)新和保護,同時積極應(yīng)對涉外知識產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟。
[Abstract]:Based on the growing situation of intellectual property disputes between China and the United States, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the intellectual property protection system between China and the United States by means of comparative analysis. Combined with several disputes on intellectual property rights between China and the United States in history and the characteristics and development trend of intellectual property disputes between China and the United States at the present stage, this paper sums up the causes of disputes, and puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions on how to avoid or reduce disputes. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction part, which mainly introduces the background and significance of the selected topic, the thought and basic structure of the thesis, and the innovation and deficiency of the paper. The second part is the literature review part, from three levels to describe the current situation of domestic and foreign research. Firstly, the basic concepts of intellectual property rights are expounded, then the causes of intellectual property disputes between China and the United States are analyzed. Finally, the strategy of how to avoid or reduce disputes is chosen. The third part introduces the characteristics of intellectual property. In short, intellectual property rights have the characteristics of invisibility, exclusivity, timeliness, regionality and reproducibility. The intellectual property protection system of China and the United States and the comparison between them are mainly explained on the two levels of legal protection and administrative protection. The fourth part is the core part of the article. This paper first introduces three disputes about intellectual property rights in the history of China and the United States, and summarizes the characteristics and development trend of intellectual property disputes between China and the United States at the present stage. Secondly, the causes of disputes are analyzed. This paper summarizes five aspects: 1. China and the United States are competing for economic interests. The rise of protectionism: 3. Increasing bilateral trade imbalance and unequal economic and trade relations between China and the United States. Differences in intellectual property system between China and the United States. Cultural differences in intellectual property rights between China and the United States. The fifth part is about how to avoid or reduce disputes. First of all, we should improve the intellectual property rights related legal mechanism, including legislation and enforcement of the two aspects. The second is the use of a variety of dispute settlement mechanisms, including 1. To invoke the TRIPS Agreement and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Actively promote the establishment of a bilateral coordination mechanism between China and the United States. Give full play to the advantages of folk diplomacy. Finally, we should strengthen the innovation and protection of intellectual property, and actively deal with foreign intellectual property litigation.
【學位授予單位】：東北財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D971.2;D923.4;F752.7

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝鳳燕;;美國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護的執(zhí)法現(xiàn)狀及對我國的影響[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2012年01期

2 凌金鑄;;中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)關(guān)系的發(fā)生、發(fā)展與影響[J];當代中國史研究;2007年05期

3 張燕;;中美貿(mào)易逆差問題分析及對策[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2007年05期

4 劉陽;;試析中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域貿(mào)易爭端的最新發(fā)展動向[J];科技與法律;2005年03期

5 何興強;;中國加入世貿(mào)組織以來的中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)爭端[J];美國研究;2008年02期

6 東崗;;提升企業(yè)自主專利創(chuàng)造能力 改變知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域弱勢地位[J];中國經(jīng)貿(mào);2012年02期

7 巫玉芳;美國版權(quán)侵權(quán)刑事責任的評析[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2000年03期

8 鄭程程;;中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)爭端實質(zhì)及其對策分析[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2010年07期

9 段華平;劉超;;金融危機背景下建立中美貿(mào)易糾紛雙邊談判機制的構(gòu)想[J];行政與法;2010年08期

10 程晨;王倩倩;;中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)爭端分析[J];中國集體經(jīng)濟;2011年19期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 王瑞杰;美國國會與中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題研究（1989-2005）[D];復(fù)旦大學;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條

1 郭靜;中美貿(mào)易摩擦中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)爭端問題探析[D];東北財經(jīng)大學;2010年

2 彭芳菲;中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)爭端問題[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2007年

3 吳駿騰;中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護紛爭研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2007年

4 劉薇;中美貿(mào)易摩擦中的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題研究[D];吉林大學;2008年

，

本文編號：2214709