本文選題：瘋女 + 傳媒人��； 參考：《青年記者》2014年22期

【摘要】：正時(shí)隔30年,重提此案,作為傳媒人,各位涉案人又是筆者所尊敬的前輩,仍然免不了心頭沉重。但是在中國傳媒法制史甚至傳媒史上,本案是一個(gè)繞不過去的坎。這是1949年以后中國記者第一次因?yàn)樽约翰蓪懙膱?bào)道走上法庭,而且不是現(xiàn)在常見的民事侵權(quán)糾紛,而是刑事被告,兩位資深記者被判犯有誹謗罪,處以刑罰。真假"瘋女"之爭此案緣起《二十年"瘋女"之謎》。此文發(fā)表于上海《民主與法制》月刊1983年第1期"道德法庭"專欄,署名"本
[Abstract]:After 30 years, the case was brought up again. As a media person, the people involved in the case are my respected predecessors and still have a heavy heart. But in the history of Chinese media law and even media history, this case is an insurmountable hurdle. This is the first time since 1949 that a Chinese journalist has taken to court for his own reports, and instead of a common civil tort dispute now, two senior journalists have been found guilty of libel and sentenced to punishment. The dispute over the real and false "crazy women" originated from < 20 years' Mystery of the Crazy Women. This article was published in Shanghai monthly "Democracy and legal system" in 1983, No. 1 "moral Court" column, signed "book"
【分類號(hào)】：D920.5;D924.3;G212
，

本文編號(hào)：2118310