本文選題：后現(xiàn)代 + 后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)��； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本論文題目為《后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)視野下的構(gòu)建性法律主體》，通過后現(xiàn)代文化與后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)有關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的研讀，，并結(jié)合垮掉的一代等相關(guān)文學(xué)作品創(chuàng)作，試圖尋求在后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)中的法律主體的建構(gòu)性維度的真相。 當(dāng)人類邁入現(xiàn)代文明特別是西方社會(huì)馬不停蹄地集成式的進(jìn)入后發(fā)展化的時(shí)期，良多社會(huì)、經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治問題接踵而來，20世紀(jì)初的兩次世界大戰(zhàn)帶給人的精神創(chuàng)傷；冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期兩大政治勢(shì)力對(duì)于異類的排擠與鎮(zhèn)壓；南北貧富差距的拉大；戰(zhàn)火依舊紛飛 20世紀(jì)70年代，產(chǎn)生了對(duì)西方學(xué)術(shù)界最有影響力的后現(xiàn)代主義思潮，其中后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)是后現(xiàn)代主義在法學(xué)理論中發(fā)出的最強(qiáng)音。后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)體現(xiàn)了對(duì)西方現(xiàn)代法學(xué)的反思、解構(gòu)與超越。在現(xiàn)代法學(xué)理論中，法律是以觀點(diǎn)保守、態(tài)度中立、價(jià)值普適的視角而出現(xiàn)的。法律在維持社會(huì)秩序與安定、促進(jìn)社會(huì)發(fā)展與人權(quán)進(jìn)步等方面，有著不可小噓的貢獻(xiàn)。然而在新的歷史時(shí)期，現(xiàn)代法律也面臨著其自身合法性的危機(jī)。后現(xiàn)代主義的法學(xué)家們將反思的對(duì)象直指現(xiàn)代法學(xué)所賴以存在的根基——基本原則、法治理念，試圖闡述現(xiàn)代法學(xué)在現(xiàn)有規(guī)則——原則體系下對(duì)于強(qiáng)者利益的保護(hù)，而淡忘了弱勢(shì)群體，漠視弱勢(shì)群體的權(quán)益。后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)家們企圖顛覆蘊(yùn)含在現(xiàn)代法學(xué)體系下的一脈相傳的且具有形而上學(xué)的法律本質(zhì)，打破話語霸權(quán)，使得非主流、邊緣主體的話語具有存在的空間。 筆者認(rèn)為要為后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)思潮辯護(hù)，首先要借助于詞源學(xué)的相關(guān)知識(shí)客觀、全面地分析后現(xiàn)代語境下的詞語之義，現(xiàn)存的具備鮮明的后現(xiàn)代色彩的法學(xué)思想以及后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)思潮內(nèi)部的各類爭鳴，這一些都體現(xiàn)在現(xiàn)今的法學(xué)著作中，“現(xiàn)代”和“后現(xiàn)代”的交鋒屢見不鮮。在后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)家的視角下，法學(xué)與文學(xué)本為一體物，只是由于現(xiàn)代法學(xué)的霸權(quán)觀念，從而導(dǎo)致了現(xiàn)代法學(xué)的封閉性。為了尋找制度的解構(gòu)，后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)吸引了很多中外法學(xué)研究者的廣泛關(guān)注，西方后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)的興起并不意味著它已經(jīng)取代了現(xiàn)代法學(xué)在社會(huì)中的主導(dǎo)地位，不過后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)在西方學(xué)術(shù)界仍處于不斷發(fā)展進(jìn)步中的理論，這就更需要通過不斷的實(shí)踐去考證。而對(duì)于處在轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期的中國來說，盡管關(guān)注點(diǎn)更多集中在制度建構(gòu)，基于法治合理性作為中國法學(xué)理論建構(gòu)中最為緊迫的任務(wù)而存在，從某一側(cè)面來說，后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)理論與中國傳統(tǒng)的法律思想具有一定程度上的類同，長期以來中國是處于前現(xiàn)代社會(huì)中的，因而后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)理論在中國仍處于嬰兒時(shí)期。本文通過具體的文學(xué)文本來尋求后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)的法律主體思想，這其中的目的與意義在于：通過探尋后現(xiàn)代主義的建構(gòu)性主體觀念，以點(diǎn)帶面，證明在后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)中依舊存在著大量的建構(gòu)性內(nèi)容，后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)家并非法律末世的鼓吹者，而是法治新生的預(yù)言家。
[Abstract]:The title of this thesis is "the subject of constructive Law in the View of Post-modern Law", through the study of the literature related to postmodern culture and postmodern law, and combined with the creation of related literary works, such as the broken generation, etc. This paper tries to seek the truth of the constructive dimension of legal subject in postmodern jurisprudence. When human beings entered the post-development period of modern civilization, especially the western society, many social, economic and political problems followed the mental trauma brought by the two world wars in the early 20th century. The exclusion and repression of heterogeneity by the two major political forces during the Cold War; the widening gap between the rich and the poor between the North and the South; the war of war still raging in the 1970s, resulting in the most influential post-modernist trend of thought in Western academia. Post-modern law is the strongest sound of post-modernism in the theory of law. Post-modern law reflects the reflection, deconstruction and transcendence of western modern law. In modern legal theory, law appears from the perspective of conservative viewpoint, neutral attitude and universal value. Law has made great contributions to maintaining social order and stability, promoting social development and human rights progress. However, in the new historical period, modern law also faces the crisis of its own legitimacy. The jurists of postmodernism point directly to the basic principles and the concept of rule of law on which modern jurisprudence is based, and try to explain the protection of the interests of the strong under the existing rules-principle system. And forgot the vulnerable groups, ignoring the rights and interests of vulnerable groups. The postmodern jurists attempt to subvert the metaphysical legal essence contained in the modern legal system, break the discourse hegemony, and make the discourse of non-mainstream and marginal subject have the space of existence. The author thinks that in order to defend the trend of thought in postmodern law, we should first of all analyze the meaning of words in the post-modern context by means of the objective knowledge of etymology. The extant postmodern legal thought and various kinds of contentions within the postmodern legal trend of thought are reflected in the present legal works, and the confrontation between "modern" and "post-modern" is common. From the perspective of postmodern jurists, the combination of law and literature is only due to the hegemonic concept of modern jurisprudence, which leads to the closeness of modern jurisprudence. In order to find the deconstruction of the system, the post-modern law has attracted the extensive attention of many Chinese and foreign legal researchers. The rise of the western post-modern law does not mean that it has replaced the leading position of the modern law in the society. However, postmodern law is still in the process of continuous development and progress in western academic circles, which needs to be verified through continuous practice. For China in the transition period, although the focus is more on the system construction, the rationality of the rule of law as the most urgent task in the construction of Chinese legal theory, from a certain side, The postmodern legal theory is similar to the Chinese traditional legal thought to some extent. For a long time, China is in the pre-modern society, so the post-modern legal theory is still in infancy in China. This paper seeks the legal subject thought of postmodern law through specific literary texts, the purpose and significance of which lies in: by exploring the constructive subject concept of postmodernism, It is proved that there is still a great deal of constructive content in postmodern jurisprudence, and postmodern jurists are not advocates of the end of the law, but new prophets of the rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 方寧;沈曉蕾;;后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)的建構(gòu)性維度研究[J];研究生法學(xué);2002年03期

2 朱曉U

本文編號(hào)：2092432