發(fā)布時間：2018-05-10 22:41

  本文選題：消費者撤回權(quán) + 消費者保護�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：德國消費者撤回權(quán)是德國消費者保護法律體系中最引人注目的制度,對德國消費者權(quán)益的保護發(fā)揮著巨大的且無法替代的作用,并產(chǎn)生了廣泛的國際影響力,掀起了大陸法系消費者保護制度的革命。我國《消費者保護法》的修訂工作正在進行之中,從已經(jīng)公布的征求意見稿看,此次修訂將引進消費者撤回權(quán)制度。當下,研究已經(jīng)發(fā)展成熟的德國消費者撤回權(quán)制度無疑成為推動立法完善的助益之舉。本文嘗試綜合運用歷史分析、比較法分析、邏輯分析歸納、理論和實踐分析結(jié)合的方法,研究德國消費者撤回權(quán),并在此基礎(chǔ)上探討其對我國完善消費者保護制度的借鑒意義。 全文共分五大部分: 第一部分為消費者撤回權(quán)概述。主要介紹了消費者撤回權(quán)的概念和特征,系統(tǒng)梳理消費者撤回權(quán)的歷史沿革,并從傳統(tǒng)民法和消費者保護法的角度探討了消費者撤回權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)。本文認為消費者撤回權(quán)是一項特別的消費者撤回權(quán),也是一項獨立的消費者權(quán)。 第二部分為消費者撤回權(quán)的制度構(gòu)造。在該部分中,筆者對消費者撤回權(quán)的制度構(gòu)造進行了系統(tǒng)介紹。從消費者撤回權(quán)的適用范圍、權(quán)利行使、除斥期間、法律效果四個部分研究德國消費者的制度內(nèi)容。 第三部分為消費者撤回權(quán)對私法傳統(tǒng)的突破。該部分主要探討消費者撤回權(quán)的主要理論創(chuàng)新之處。本文認為消費者撤回權(quán)發(fā)端于傳統(tǒng)私法又突破了傳統(tǒng)私法的理論范式,具有獨特的理論價值,這也是消費者撤回權(quán)制度的最大理論問題。本文將消費者撤回權(quán)的理論創(chuàng)新歸納為三個方面:權(quán)利主體上對平等原則的突破、權(quán)利功能上對契約自由原則的突破、權(quán)利效果上對契約嚴守原則的突破。 第四部分為消費者撤回權(quán)的正當性基礎(chǔ)。筆者在本部分主要嘗試運用多學(xué)科的研究方法探討消費者的正當性基礎(chǔ),是對消費者撤回權(quán)理論創(chuàng)新的多角度論證,是第三部分的延續(xù)和深華。本文認為消費者撤回權(quán)有堅實的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)、經(jīng)濟學(xué)基礎(chǔ)和社會學(xué)基礎(chǔ)。從哲學(xué)角度觀察,消費者撤回權(quán)是實質(zhì)正義勃興的結(jié)果;從經(jīng)濟學(xué)角度觀察,消費者撤回權(quán)是消費者和經(jīng)營者利益博弈所形成的消費者主權(quán)在法律上的體現(xiàn);從社會學(xué)角度觀察,消費者撤回權(quán)是消費社會的產(chǎn)物,也是消費社會的保障。 第五部分為德國消費者撤回權(quán)對完善我國消費者保護制度的借鑒意義。該部分主要嘗試立足我國消費者保護實踐,探討消費者撤回權(quán)在我國確立的必要性、可行性和具體的立法方案。本文認為我消費者保護現(xiàn)狀不容樂觀,相關(guān)法律制度較為落后,借鑒德國消費者撤回權(quán)大有必要。且我國民法和消費者法理論研究已經(jīng)較為成熟,部分地區(qū)已經(jīng)進行了立法實踐,部分經(jīng)營者已經(jīng)自發(fā)進行了相關(guān)實踐,因此,我國已經(jīng)具備了引進該制度的理論和實踐基礎(chǔ)。在論證了必要和可行性的基礎(chǔ)上,本文提出借鑒德國消費者撤回權(quán)完善我國消費者保護制度的方案。
[Abstract]:The revocation of German consumers is the most noticeable system in the German consumer protection law system, which plays a huge and irreplaceable role in the protection of the rights and interests of the German consumer, and has produced extensive international influence and set off the revolution of the system of consumer protection in the civil law system. In the course of it, from the published solicitation draft, this revision will introduce the system of consumer withdrawal right. At the moment, the study of the mature German consumer withdrawal system has undoubtedly become a beneficial action to promote the perfection of the legislation. This article tries to make a comprehensive use of historical analysis, comparative law analysis, logical analysis and induction, theory and practice. The method of combination is used to study the withdrawal right of German consumers, and on this basis, it discusses its reference significance for perfecting the consumer protection system in China.
The full text is divided into five parts:
The first part is an overview of the right of consumer withdrawal. It mainly introduces the concept and characteristics of the right of consumer withdrawal, systematically combs the historical evolution of the right of consumer withdrawal, and probes into the legal nature of the right of withdrawal of consumers from the perspective of the traditional civil law and consumer protection law. It's an independent consumer right.
The second part is the institutional structure of the right to withdraw the consumer. In this part, the author systematically introduces the institutional structure of the right to withdraw the consumer. From the scope of the application of the right of the withdrawal of consumers, the exercise of rights, the period of exclusion, and the legal effect, the content of the system of the German consumer is studied in four parts.
The third part is the breakthrough of the consumer withdrawal right to the tradition of private law. This part mainly discusses the main theoretical innovation of the right of consumer withdrawal. This article holds that the right of consumer withdrawal, which originates from the traditional private law, breaks through the theoretical paradigm of the traditional private law and has unique theoretical value. This is the biggest theoretical problem of the system of consumer withdrawal. In this paper, the theoretical innovation of the right of consumer withdrawal is summed up in three aspects: the breakthrough of the principle of equality on the subject of rights, the breakthrough of the principle of freedom of contract in the right and function, and the breakthrough of the principle of strict adherence to the contract in the effect of rights.
The fourth part is the justification basis of the right to withdraw the consumer. In this part, the author tries to explore the legitimacy basis of the consumer by using multidisciplinary research methods. It is a multi angle demonstration of the theory innovation of the consumer withdrawal right and the continuation and deep China of the third part. This article holds that the withdrawal rights of the consumers have a solid philosophical foundation, economics From a philosophical point of view, the right of consumer withdrawal is the result of substantial justice. From an economic perspective, the right to withdraw consumers is a legal embodiment of consumer sovereignty which is formed by the interests of consumers and operators. From a sociological perspective, the right to withdraw consumers is the product of the consumer society. The security of the consumer society.
The fifth part is the reference significance of the German consumer withdrawal right to consummate the system of consumer protection in our country. This part mainly tries to discuss the necessity, feasibility and specific legislative plan of the establishment of consumer withdrawal right in our country based on the practice of consumer protection in our country. This article holds that the present situation of the protection of the consumer is not optimistic and the relevant legal system is concerned. It is more backward, it is necessary to draw lessons from the German consumers' right to withdraw. And the theory of civil law and consumer law is more mature in our country. Some areas have already carried out legislative practice. Some of the operators have carried out the relevant practice spontaneously. Therefore, our country has already had the theoretical and practical basis of introducing the system. On the basis of behavior, this paper proposes a plan to improve the consumer protection system by drawing on German consumers' right of withdrawal.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D951.6;DD913

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張學(xué)哲;;德國當代私法體系變遷中的消費者法——以歐盟法為背景[J];比較法研究;2006年06期

2 張學(xué)哲;;消費者撤回權(quán)制度與合同自由原則——以中國民法法典化為背景[J];比較法研究;2009年06期

3 金勵;;消費者商品交易反悔權(quán)之研究[J];重慶交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

4 侯先鋒;;后悔權(quán)制度的法學(xué)思考[J];財經(jīng)政法資訊;2010年02期

5 周顯志,陳小龍;試論消費信用合同的“冷卻期”制度[J];法商研究;2002年05期

6 梁慧星;中國的消費者政策和消費者立法[J];法學(xué);2000年05期

7 錢玉文;;消費者權(quán)的法律解釋——基于判例與法理視角[J];法學(xué);2008年08期

8 董新凱,夏瑜;冷卻期制度與消費者權(quán)益保護[J];河北法學(xué);2005年05期

9 嚴歡歡;;冷卻期制度研究[J];河南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2007年04期

10 劉青文;;德國的消費者撤回權(quán)制度[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治論壇;2009年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 盧菁菁;冷卻期法律制度研究[D];南京理工大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1871275