本文選題：東亞一體化 + 日本新安保法�。� 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：一體化理論一向是國際關(guān)系學(xué)者探討的重點(diǎn)之一,最早開始一體化的是在歐洲,有聯(lián)邦主義、功能主義、新功能主義、政府間主義等眾多理論派別。東亞作為世界經(jīng)濟(jì)活躍地區(qū)之一,地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)合作日益緊密,國家之間關(guān)系不斷發(fā)展,一體化進(jìn)程有所進(jìn)展,在經(jīng)貿(mào)合作、安全領(lǐng)域合作以及機(jī)制建設(shè)方面取得一定成就,但一體化進(jìn)程也存在諸多結(jié)構(gòu)性阻礙因素。作為東亞一體化進(jìn)程中一個(gè)有重要影響力的的國家,日本曾在2009年由時(shí)任首相的鳩山由紀(jì)夫提出“東亞共同體設(shè)想”,到2016年,在安倍政府強(qiáng)力推動(dòng)下,包括10個(gè)修正法和1個(gè)新立法的新安保法正式開始實(shí)施,提出并重新定義“存亡危機(jī)事態(tài)”和“重要影響事態(tài)”,使把自衛(wèi)隊(duì)派遣到海外成為可能,從法律方面保障自衛(wèi)隊(duì)行使集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的權(quán)利,明確援助他國甚至武力攻擊敵國的條件,強(qiáng)化日美軍事一體化,也就是說日本和平憲法第九條被徹底架空,顛覆了戰(zhàn)后日本長期堅(jiān)持的“專守防衛(wèi)”安保政策。對此,周邊的東亞國家表達(dá)自己的態(tài)度,其中中國和韓國表達(dá)了強(qiáng)烈不滿,菲律賓明確表示支持和歡迎,其他大多數(shù)東南亞國家保持沉默。安倍政府堅(jiān)決推行新安保法后,加劇東亞地區(qū)安全困境,造成東亞地區(qū)國家關(guān)系緊張,經(jīng)濟(jì)合作減緩。未來東亞一體化肯定是一個(gè)從經(jīng)濟(jì)(自貿(mào)區(qū))開始,然后逐步向政治、安全等擴(kuò)散的過程,以RCEP推動(dòng)?xùn)|亞經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化發(fā)展,構(gòu)建危機(jī)管理機(jī)制保障東亞區(qū)域安全。本文主要分為四部分,第一部分是理論闡述、概念界定和現(xiàn)狀分析,首先就一體化理論按照功能主義、新功能主義的邏輯進(jìn)行闡述,然后界定“東亞”、“東亞一體化”等相關(guān)概念,分析東亞一體化的近況。第二部分是分析新安保法的具體內(nèi)容有哪些變化,日本對外戰(zhàn)略的變化以及東亞國家所持的態(tài)度。第三部分是從安全、政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)角度分析新安保法案對東亞一體化的沖擊和挑戰(zhàn)。第四部分從完善RCEP和危機(jī)管理的角度提出促進(jìn)東亞一體化發(fā)展的對策。
[Abstract]:The integration theory has always been one of the focal points of the international relations scholars. The first one to start integration in Europe is federalism, functionalism, neo-functionalism, intergovernmentalism and many other theoretical schools. East Asia, as one of the economically active regions in the world, has witnessed increasingly close regional economic cooperation, continuous development of relations between countries, progress in the process of integration, and certain achievements in economic and trade cooperation, cooperation in the field of security, and mechanism building. But there are also many structural obstacles to the process of integration. As an influential country in the process of East Asian integration, Japan put forward the "East Asian Community concept" in 2009 by the then Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, and by 2016, under the strong push of Abe's government, The new security law, which includes 10 amendments and 1 new legislation, has been formally implemented, introducing and redefining "existential crises" and "important developments", making it possible to send the SDF overseas, Legally, the right of the Self-Defense Forces to exercise the right to collective self-defence is guaranteed, the conditions for assisting other countries and even attacking the enemy country by force are clearly defined, and the military integration of Japan and the United States is strengthened. In other words, Article 9 of the Japanese Peace Constitution is completely set aside. After the war, Japan's long-held "defensive" security policy. The neighboring East Asian countries expressed their attitude, with China and South Korea expressing strong dissatisfaction, the Philippines explicitly expressing support and welcoming, and most other Southeast Asian countries remaining silent. The Abe government's firm implementation of the new security law has exacerbated security dilemmas in East Asia, causing tensions and slowing economic cooperation in the region. The future East Asian integration is certainly a process from the economic (free trade area), then gradually to the political, security and other proliferation process, with RCEP to promote the development of East Asian economic integration, to build a crisis management mechanism to ensure the regional security of East Asia. This paper is mainly divided into four parts. The first part is the theoretical elaboration, the concept definition and the present situation analysis. Firstly, the integration theory is expounded according to the logic of functionalism and neo-functionalism, and then "East Asia" is defined. This paper analyzes the recent situation of East Asian integration with related concepts such as East Asian Integration. The second part is to analyze the change of the content of the new security law, the change of Japan's foreign strategy and the attitude of East Asian countries. The third part analyzes the impact and challenge of the new security legislation on East Asian integration from the security, political and economic perspectives. The fourth part puts forward the countermeasures to promote the integration of East Asia from the angle of perfecting RCEP and crisis management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D931.3;DD912.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李勇;;東亞一體化進(jìn)程由模糊到清晰[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2006年02期

2 張威威;;金融動(dòng)蕩背景下的中日韓合作及東亞一體化[J];東南亞縱橫;2009年01期

3 張威威;;金融動(dòng)蕩背景下的中日韓合作及東亞一體化[J];和平與發(fā)展;2009年02期

4 胡亞麗;試析東亞一體化進(jìn)程中的東亞認(rèn)同[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

5 胡鞍鋼,門洪華;研究中國東亞一體化戰(zhàn)略的重要意義[J];國際觀察;2005年03期

6 曹云華;論東亞一體化的動(dòng)力與源泉[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2005年08期

7 張錫鎮(zhèn);;雙軌運(yùn)行的東亞一體化[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1844352