本文選題：農(nóng)業(yè)反壟斷豁免 + 制度價值��； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：在美國農(nóng)業(yè)反壟斷豁免制度的形成過程中，鐵路、公司和農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)者及其合作社起了決定性作用。該制度得以確立和實施的歷史背景是，美國的農(nóng)業(yè)已經(jīng)完成了市場化進程，農(nóng)業(yè)合作社已經(jīng)在數(shù)量、規(guī)模和合作理念方面取得了相當(dāng)?shù)某删�，農(nóng)業(yè)面臨著特殊的自然風(fēng)險和市場風(fēng)險，農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)者面臨著強大中間商的市場壓力，以及農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)者為對抗以公司形式組織起來的中間商而開展了農(nóng)業(yè)合作社運動。盡管在《謝爾曼法》的立法過程中，立法者充分考慮了農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)者及其合作社的反壟斷法律地位，但該法卻未能規(guī)定包括農(nóng)業(yè)豁免制度在內(nèi)的任何反壟斷豁免制度；《克萊頓法》第6章概括性規(guī)定了農(nóng)業(yè)反壟斷豁免制度，，但其因存在缺陷和不足，而不能有效地滿足農(nóng)業(yè)合作生產(chǎn)實踐的需求；被譽為“農(nóng)業(yè)合作社大憲章”的《凱普—沃斯蒂德法》、《1926合作交易法》、《漁民聯(lián)合交易法》和《羅賓遜—帕特曼法》的頒布以及大量判例法的形成，使得美國農(nóng)業(yè)反壟斷豁免制度趨于完善。該制度的價值，包括公平價值和效率價值，其中公平價值又包括機會公平價值和結(jié)果公平價值。該制度的實體規(guī)則，包括適用范圍規(guī)則、組織要件、成員要件、行為要件和有關(guān)農(nóng)業(yè)合作社壟斷地位的規(guī)則。該制度的控制模式，包括其特有的行政控制模式以及該行政控制模式與司法控制模式之間的關(guān)系。鑒于我國與美國在農(nóng)業(yè)方面的相似性，美國農(nóng)業(yè)反壟斷豁免制度對我國的借鑒意義是，我國應(yīng)當(dāng)以專門的立法，確立積極授權(quán)的和有限的農(nóng)業(yè)反壟斷豁免制度，并保障反壟斷法的有效實施。
[Abstract]:In the formation of agricultural antitrust exemption system in the United States, railways, companies and agricultural producers and their cooperatives played a decisive role. The historical background of the establishment and implementation of the system is that the agricultural industry in the United States has completed the process of marketization, and agricultural cooperatives have made considerable achievements in terms of quantity, scale and concept of cooperation. Agriculture is faced with special natural risks and market risks, agricultural producers are facing the market pressure from powerful middlemen, and agricultural producers have launched the agricultural cooperative movement in order to confront the middlemen organized in the form of companies. Although in the legislative process of the Sherman Act, legislators took full account of the antitrust legal status of agricultural producers and their cooperatives, However, the Act failed to provide for any anti-monopoly exemption system, including the agricultural exemption system. Chapter 6 of the Clayton Act provided for the agricultural anti-monopoly exemption system in a broad sense, but it was flawed and inadequate. But can not meet the demand of agricultural cooperative production practice effectively; The promulgation of the Cardinal Carta of Agricultural Cooperatives, the 1926 Cooperative Trading Act, the Joint Fisherman Act and the Robinson Patterman Act, as well as the formation of a great deal of case law, So that the agricultural antitrust exemption system in the United States tends to improve. The value of the system includes fair value and efficiency value, and fair value includes opportunity fair value and result fair value. The substantive rules of this system include the rules of scope of application, the elements of organization, the elements of membership, the elements of behavior and the rules concerning the monopoly status of agricultural cooperatives. The control mode of the system includes its unique administrative control mode and the relationship between the administrative control mode and the judicial control mode. In view of the similarities between China and the United States in agriculture, the agricultural antitrust exemption system of the United States is of great significance to our country, that is, we should adopt special legislation to establish an active and limited agricultural antitrust exemption system. And to ensure the effective implementation of the anti-monopoly law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D971.2;DD912.4;DD912.29

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 邵南青;我國反壟斷法農(nóng)業(yè)適用除外制度的研究[D];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

本文編號：1807771