發(fā)布時間：2018-04-26 18:26

  本文選題：商業(yè)方法 + 商業(yè)方法專利�。� 參考：《上海交通大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)的商業(yè)方法通常被認為是“智力活動的規(guī)則或方法”而不受專利法的保護，近年來隨著計算機和網(wǎng)絡技術等高科技的進步，尤其是出現(xiàn)了電子商務等新型商業(yè)模式，使得與商業(yè)方法相關的專利保護越來越受重視。商業(yè)方法在與計算機結(jié)合后被引入到了金融經(jīng)濟活動中，一些國際企業(yè)為保護其在新興網(wǎng)絡經(jīng)濟中的先發(fā)優(yōu)勢，開始就商業(yè)方法提出專利申請，尋求專利法的保護。1998年Stated StreetBank案，美國一改過去“商業(yè)方法不可專利”的做法，首次敞開了“商業(yè)方法可專利”的大門。此后，各國紛紛開始根據(jù)本國的需要調(diào)整專利政策，承認了商業(yè)方法的可專利性，并且形成了各自的專利審查標準。商業(yè)方法專利保護具有合理性，但同時要根據(jù)社會的發(fā)展水平來確定合理的審查標準。隨著社會的發(fā)展，各個國家對于商業(yè)方法專利的態(tài)度也是在實踐中不斷變化的，如何立足于我國的社會發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀與時俱進的制定出相關的法律是值得研究的。 本文通過對中美四個具體案例的分析，得出中美對商業(yè)方法專利的態(tài)度及其審查標準，所選的案例之間反映了兩個國家在不同時期對于商業(yè)方法專利的不同的態(tài)度，審查的標準也有所不同，研究的目的在于從中找出異同點，同時，通過對美國的最新案例的分析研究得出對我國的啟示，對我國未來的法律制定做出一點建議。 本文分為引言、正文和結(jié)語三個部分。引言部分將介紹寫作的背景、目的。正文分為四個部分： 第一部分，，界定了商業(yè)方法和商業(yè)方法專利的定義。首先回顧了知識產(chǎn)權界對商業(yè)方法提出的各種定義，并對本文中所討論的商業(yè)方法進行了界定，然后理清了商業(yè)方法專利的淵源和概念，為后文的論述做下鋪墊。 第二部分，中國和美國各兩個典型的商業(yè)方法專利案例的簡介，所選的案例之間反映了兩個國家在不同時期對于商業(yè)方法專利的不同態(tài)度，具有典型性。 第三部分，中美商業(yè)方法專利保護的比較。首先結(jié)合案例分析了我國商業(yè)方法專利的申請狀況與審查條件，由兩個典型案例作為背景對美國商業(yè)方法專利審查標準的歷史沿革進行了闡述，進一步對中美兩國商業(yè)方法專利保護進行比較分析，從中發(fā)現(xiàn)兩國對商業(yè)方法專利保護的不同之處。 第四部分，通過對我國商業(yè)方法專利保護現(xiàn)狀的分析，結(jié)合對美國商業(yè)方法專利的發(fā)展趨勢的展望及其對我國的啟示，得出對我國商業(yè)方法專利保護的幾點對策及建議。
[Abstract]:Traditional business methods are often regarded as "rules or methods of intellectual activity" that are not protected by patent law. In recent years, with the development of high technology such as computer and network technology, especially the emergence of new business models such as electronic commerce, The patent protection related to business methods has been paid more and more attention. Business methods were introduced into financial and economic activities after being combined with computers. In order to protect their first-mover advantages in the emerging network economy, some international enterprises began to file patent applications for business methods and seek the protection of patent laws. 1998 Stated StreetBank case, The United States has opened the door to patentability of business methods for the first time. Since then, various countries have begun to adjust their patent policies according to their own needs, recognizing the patentability of business methods and forming their own patent examination standards. The patent protection of business method is reasonable, but the reasonable standard of examination should be determined according to the level of social development. With the development of society, the attitude of each country to the business method patent is constantly changing in practice. It is worth studying how to base on the current situation of social development of our country and make the relevant law with the times. Based on the analysis of four specific cases between China and the United States, this paper concludes the attitudes of China and the United States towards business method patents and their standards of examination. The selected cases reflect the different attitudes of the two countries towards business method patents in different periods. The purpose of the study is to find out the similarities and differences, at the same time, through the analysis of the latest cases of the United States to draw inspiration to our country, to make some suggestions for the future law of our country. This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The introduction introduces the background and purpose of the writing. The text is divided into four parts: The first part defines the definition of business method and business method patent. This paper reviews various definitions of business methods put forward by intellectual property rights circles, defines the business methods discussed in this paper, and then clarifies the origin and concept of business method patents, which lays the groundwork for the later discussion. The second part is a brief introduction of two typical business method patent cases in China and the United States. The selected cases reflect the different attitudes of the two countries towards business method patents in different periods and are typical. The third part, the comparison of patent protection of business methods between China and America. First of all, it analyzes the application status and examination conditions of business method patent in China, and expounds the history and evolution of American business method patent examination standard from two typical cases as the background. By comparing the patent protection of business methods between China and the United States, we can find out the differences between the two countries in the protection of business method patents. The fourth part, through the analysis of the current situation of business method patent protection in our country, combined with the prospect of the development trend of American business method patent and its enlightenment to our country, obtains several countermeasures and suggestions to the business method patent protection of our country.
【學位授予單位】：上海交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.42;D971.2

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 郭曉倩;論商業(yè)方法的專利保護[D];沈陽師范大學;2013年

2 劉淳捚;商業(yè)方法專利保護問題研究[D];黑龍江大學;2013年

本文編號：1807141