本文選題：承繼的共同正犯 + 因果共犯論　； 參考：《法學(xué)》2017年03期

【摘要】：對于是否應(yīng)肯定承繼共犯的問題,現(xiàn)在主要是部分肯定承繼的"中間說"與全面否定承繼的"消極說"之間的對立。日本最高裁判所2012年的決定是其第一次就該問題做出的判斷,促進(jìn)了承繼共犯理論的新發(fā)展。在"中間說"的理論根據(jù)并不充分的背景下,可以采取的理論結(jié)構(gòu)是,以肯定先行為人存在作為義務(wù)為前提,認(rèn)定通過共謀參與先行為人行為的后行為人與先行為人共有這種作為義務(wù)。為此,后行為人成立搶劫罪、敲詐勒索罪或者詐騙罪的不作為犯,并與屬于作為犯的先行為人之間成立這些犯罪的共同正犯。這一結(jié)論是以后行為人僅就共謀參與之后的事實(shí)承擔(dān)罪責(zé)為前提,不僅是妥當(dāng)?shù)?而且也與因果共犯論之間具有整合性。
[Abstract]:As to the question of whether to confirm the succession of accomplices, there is mainly the opposition between the "intermediate theory" and the negative-inheriting "negative theory".The decision of Japan Supreme Court in 2012 is its first judgment on this issue, which promotes the new development of the theory of inheriting accomplice.Under the background that the theoretical basis of "intermediate theory" is not sufficient, the theoretical structure can be taken as the premise of affirming the existence of the prior actor as the obligation.The author holds that the former actor and the former actor share the obligation to act through collusion.For this reason, the perpetrator establishes the crime of robbery, extortion or crime of fraud, and establishes the joint principal offender of these crimes with the first person who belongs to the crime of act.This conclusion is not only appropriate, but also integrated with the theory of causal accomplice.
【作者單位】： 日本最高裁判所;東京大學(xué);蘇州大學(xué)王健法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2013年度教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究規(guī)劃基金項(xiàng)目“共謀射程理論:共犯研究的一種新路徑”(項(xiàng)目編號:13YJA820051)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D931.3;DD914

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曉黎;;共犯理論與司法實(shí)務(wù)高峰論壇在京召開[J];民主與法制;2011年03期

2 馬文;;片面共犯理論的困境及出路探微[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

3 丁浩s，

本文編號：1768452