本文選題：德國(guó)法　切入點(diǎn)：環(huán)境侵權(quán)之訴　出處：《法律適用》2017年15期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：德國(guó)環(huán)境侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系要件的證明策略是推定規(guī)則。該規(guī)則屬于法律上的事實(shí)推定,具有分配客觀證明責(zé)任的功能。進(jìn)一步考察即可發(fā)現(xiàn),推定規(guī)則是基于德國(guó)實(shí)體法中客觀證明責(zé)任的分配規(guī)范而創(chuàng)設(shè),并通過相關(guān)配套設(shè)施的輔助,及法官綜合運(yùn)用多種證明評(píng)價(jià)方法得以有效實(shí)施的�？紤]到我國(guó)既有法律體系與制度環(huán)境均不同于德國(guó),直接引入推定規(guī)則的方案并不可行,但其解決問題的思路及遵循的規(guī)則卻極具啟發(fā)意義,即我國(guó)對(duì)環(huán)境侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系的證明策略安排,也應(yīng)立足于實(shí)體法規(guī)范中的客觀證明責(zé)任分配,著重強(qiáng)調(diào)法官運(yùn)用證明評(píng)價(jià)方法的能力,以達(dá)到緩解因果關(guān)系要件舉證困難的最終目的。
[Abstract]:The proof strategy of environmental tort causality in Germany is the presumption rule, which belongs to the legal presumption of fact and has the function of distributing the objective burden of proof. The presumption rule is based on the allocation of objective burden of proof in German substantive law and is assisted by related facilities. Taking into account that the existing legal system and institutional environment in China are different from those in Germany, it is not feasible to introduce presumption rules directly. However, the thought of solving the problem and the rules it follows are of great enlightening significance, that is, the arrangement of proof strategy for the causality of environmental tort in our country should also be based on the objective burden of proof distribution in the norms of substantive law. Emphasis is placed on the judge's ability to use the method of proof evaluation in order to alleviate the difficulty of proving causality.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：“國(guó)家2011計(jì)劃司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心”項(xiàng)目的階段性研究成果,項(xiàng)目批準(zhǔn)號(hào):教技函[2013]26號(hào)
【分類號(hào)】：D951.6;DD912.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖揚(yáng)宇;;定罪因果關(guān)系及認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的建構(gòu)——從兩個(gè)案例切入[J];華北水利水電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2012年01期

2 權(quán)新廣;;試談刑法中的因果關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)研究;1963年03期

3 夏起經(jīng);;刑法中的因果關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)研究;1981年02期

4 梅o，

本文編號(hào)：1595281