【摘要】：目的:本課題在針灸治療中風(fēng)病的基礎(chǔ)上,針對(duì)中風(fēng)后焦慮狀態(tài)以“心腦同治”為基本治療原則,采用情志針法(即以四神針、定神針、內(nèi)關(guān)、神門、三陰交為主穴)配合徵調(diào)式樂曲與常規(guī)西藥治療作對(duì)照,觀察兩種方法對(duì)腦卒中后焦慮患者治療的臨床療效。方法:收集符合診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中風(fēng)后焦慮患者,采取患者單盲法,按就診順序隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為治療組、對(duì)照組。兩組均在中風(fēng)病常規(guī)針灸治療基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行干預(yù),治療組予以情志針法(即以四神針、定神針、內(nèi)關(guān)、神門、三陰交為主穴)配合徵調(diào)式樂曲療法,對(duì)照組采用口服西藥帕羅西汀,以漢密爾頓焦慮量表(HAMA)為主要觀察指標(biāo),輔以Zung氏焦慮自評(píng)量表(SAS)、生活自理能力評(píng)定Barthel指數(shù)(BI),來(lái)判定兩種干預(yù)方法治療中風(fēng)后焦慮障礙的臨床療效,HAMA、SAS、BI在治療前、治療第2、4、6周末各評(píng)定一次;治療后3個(gè)月隨訪時(shí),用HAMA、BI進(jìn)行評(píng)定。運(yùn)用TESS副反應(yīng)量表在治療2、4、6周末各評(píng)定一次,觀察研究過程中的不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生情況。結(jié)果:1.治療前兩組HAMD、SAS、BI評(píng)分差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。治療2周末兩組HAMD、SAS、BI評(píng)分和治療前比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.01),組間比較HAMD、SAS、BI評(píng)分差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);治療4周末兩組HAMD、SAS、BI評(píng)分和治療前比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.01),組間比較HAMD、SAS、BI評(píng)分差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);治療6周末兩組治療4周末HAMD、SAS、BI評(píng)分和治療前比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.01),組間比較HAMD、SAS、BI評(píng)分差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。2.兩組HAMA三因子(精神性焦慮因子、軀體焦慮因子及睡眠因子)評(píng)分與治療前相比,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.01),治療期間觀察兩組之間HAMD精神性焦慮因子、睡眠因子評(píng)分差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。治療第2周末至第4周末兩次組間軀體性焦慮因子評(píng)分差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),治療6周末兩組間比較評(píng)分差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。3.以治療后HAMA減分率判定兩組療效,治療組的顯效率為55.17%,總有效率為89.66%;對(duì)照組的顯效率為33.33%,總有效率為85.61%。結(jié)果經(jīng)非參數(shù)秩和檢驗(yàn)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,治療組的總體療效和對(duì)照組相比較有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(Z=-1.968,P=0.0490.05),治療組的總體療效優(yōu)于對(duì)照組。4.兩組治療第2、4、6周末TESS分值有顯著性差異(P0.01),治療組與對(duì)照組相比副作用發(fā)生少。5.治療后3個(gè)月隨訪,兩組HAMA、BI評(píng)分比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。兩組在精神性焦慮因子、睡眠因子方面均無(wú)顯著性差異(P0.05);而治療組軀體性焦慮因子得分低于對(duì)照組,有顯著性差異(P0.05)。結(jié)論:情志針法配合徵調(diào)式音樂治療中風(fēng)后焦慮障礙的整體療效優(yōu)于口服西藥帕羅西汀,尤其針對(duì)軀體性焦慮優(yōu)勢(shì)明顯,同時(shí)副反應(yīng)發(fā)生較西藥為少,且遠(yuǎn)期療效穩(wěn)定。
[Abstract]:Objective: on the basis of acupuncture and moxibustion treatment of apoplexy, according to the basic treatment principle of "heart and brain treatment" in post-stroke anxiety state, the method of emotional acupuncture was adopted (that is, four mind acupuncture, fixed spirit acupuncture, Neiguan, Shenmen). Sanyinjiao (the main point) and the routine western medicine were used to observe the clinical efficacy of the two methods in the treatment of post-stroke anxiety patients. Methods: patients with post-stroke anxiety were collected and divided into treatment group and control group. On the basis of routine acupuncture and moxibustion treatment for apoplexy, the two groups were treated with emotional acupuncture (that is, four mind acupuncture, fixed mind acupuncture, Neiguan, Shenmen, Sanyinjiao as the main points) and the music therapy. The control group was treated with oral paroxetine and the Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) was used as the main observation index. The clinical efficacy of two intervention methods in the treatment of post-stroke anxiety disorder was evaluated with Zung's self-rating anxiety scale (SAS),) (SAS), self-care ability assessment Barthel index (BI),. Before treatment, at the end of the 2nd week of treatment, and at the end of the 6th week, the patients were followed up at 3 months after treatment. The evaluation was carried out with Hamamax BI. The side effects were assessed once at the end of 6 weeks by TESS's side effects scale. The adverse reactions were observed during the course of the study. The result is 1: 1. There was no significant difference between the two groups before treatment (P0.05). At the end of 2 weeks after treatment, there were significant differences between the two groups in the scores of HAMD-SASBI and before treatment (P0.01), but there was no significant difference in the scores of HAMD-SASBI between the two groups (P0.05), and at the end of 4 weeks, the scores of HAMD-SASBI in the two groups were compared with those before treatment. The differences were statistically significant (P0.01), there was no significant difference in the scores of HAMD-SASBI between groups (P0.05), the scores of HAMD-SASBI at the end of 6 weeks and before treatment were all statistically significant (P0.01), and there was no significant difference in scores of HAMD-SASBI between groups (P0.05). 2. The scores of three factors of HAMA (mental anxiety factor, somatic anxiety factor and sleep factor) in the two groups were significantly different from those before treatment (P0.01). During the treatment period, the mental anxiety factor of HAMD was observed between the two groups. There was no significant difference in sleep factor score (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the scores of somatic anxiety between the two groups from the 2nd to 4th weekend (P0.05), but there was significant difference between the two groups at the end of 6 weeks (P0.05). The effective rate of the treatment group was 55.177.The total effective rate was 89.660.The effective rate of the control group was 33.333.The total effective rate was 85.61. Results by non-parametric rank sum test, the total curative effect of the treatment group was significantly different from that of the control group (Z ~ (-1.968) P ~ (0.049) 0.05), and the total curative effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group. There was a significant difference in TESS scores between the two groups at the end of the 6th week (P0.01). The side effects in the treatment group were less than those in the control group. After 3 months follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). There was no significant difference in mental anxiety factor and sleep factor between the two groups (P0.05), while the score of somatic anxiety factor in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group (P0.05). Conclusion: the overall curative effect of emotion acupuncture combined with music therapy for post-stroke anxiety disorder is better than that of oral paroxetine, especially for somatic anxiety, and the side effects are less than those of western medicine, and the long-term curative effect is stable.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南中醫(yī)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：R246.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 季建林;;“焦慮障礙”的概念宜引入中國(guó)[J];臨床精神醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2006年05期

2 ;全國(guó)焦慮障礙學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議征文通知[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2009年05期

3 ;第二屆全國(guó)焦慮障礙學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議征文通知[J];精神醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2010年01期

4 ;第二屆全國(guó)焦慮障礙學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議征文通知[J];臨床精神醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2010年02期

5 ;第二屆全國(guó)焦慮障礙學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議征文通知[J];中國(guó)民康醫(yī)學(xué);2010年05期

6 ;第二屆全國(guó)焦慮障礙學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議第二輪征文通知[J];精神醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2010年03期

7 趙瑋琳;;談?wù)劷箲]障礙的簡(jiǎn)易治療方法[J];人事天地;2012年11期

8 薛瑩;楊蘊(yùn)萍;;門診焦慮障礙患者的成人依戀類型研究[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2013年01期

9 薛瑩;楊蘊(yùn)萍;;門診焦慮障礙患者的自我分化水平研究[J];精神醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2013年03期

10 傅茂筍，，王伯軍，李蘭香;職業(yè)中學(xué)學(xué)生焦慮障礙及其危險(xiǎn)因素[J];中國(guó)行為醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué);1995年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 許晉川;謝方道;丁關(guān)慶;;281例焦慮障礙臨床研究[A];第七屆全國(guó)老年醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議暨海內(nèi)外華人老年醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2004年

2 陸崢;;《中國(guó)焦慮障礙防治指南》總論[A];2011年浙江省神經(jīng)病學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2011年

3 楊洪;;焦慮障礙心理機(jī)制及干預(yù)[A];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)殘疾人心理衛(wèi)生分會(huì)第五屆學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文集[C];2004年

4 李惠春;;抑郁和焦慮障礙共病模型[A];2006年浙江省精神病學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2006年

5 劉肇瑞;黃悅勤;黃瑩;程輝;羅曉敏;陳曦;;焦慮障礙相關(guān)危險(xiǎn)因素的病例對(duì)照研究[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)精神病學(xué)分會(huì)第九次全國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2011年

6 王磊;劉志芬;段慧君;任燕;劉瑋偉;向玉仙;李素萍;張克讓;;住院焦慮障礙患者的腦電超慢漲落圖分析[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)精神病學(xué)分會(huì)第九次全國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2011年

7 白炳清;;焦慮障礙新進(jìn)展[A];中國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合學(xué)會(huì)精神疾病專業(yè)委員會(huì)第十一屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2012年

8 吳傳東;李志蕓;;焦慮障礙的臨床分析[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第十次全國(guó)精神醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2012年

9 李練;史麗麗;洪霞;趙曉暉;魏鏡;;綜合醫(yī)院門診患者出現(xiàn)睡眠問題時(shí)應(yīng)高度警惕焦慮障礙[A];中國(guó)睡眠研究會(huì)第六屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2010年

10 莊麗頻;史堯勝;陳佩珍;房聰俠;夏穎;;急性焦慮障礙患者睡眠特征及其相關(guān)因素分析[A];睡眠醫(yī)學(xué)與精神衛(wèi)生研討會(huì)（中國(guó)科協(xié)2005年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)第50分會(huì)場(chǎng)）論文匯編[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 駐京記者 賈巖;探索焦慮障礙治療新路[N];醫(yī)藥經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2010年

2 周婷玉　李寧;逾90%焦慮障礙患者,未得到治療[N];新華每日電訊;2009年

3 本報(bào)記者 連漪;焦慮障礙是真實(shí)的、嚴(yán)重的疾病[N];健康報(bào);2012年

4 首都醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬北京安定醫(yī)院 許克勤;形形色色的焦慮障礙[N];健康報(bào);2007年

5 王蘇平;近兩成門診患者有抑郁/焦慮障礙[N];健康報(bào);2007年

6 記者羅剛;九成多焦慮障礙患者未得到治療[N];健康報(bào);2009年

7 健康時(shí)報(bào)記者 沙瓊;別小看了焦慮障礙[N];健康時(shí)報(bào);2009年

8 本報(bào)記者 李陽(yáng)和;焦慮障礙：知之者少,求治者更少[N];健康報(bào);2012年

9 記者 王丹;大學(xué)新生職場(chǎng)新人焦慮障礙高發(fā)[N];健康報(bào);2012年

10 本報(bào)記者 靖九江;高校新生、職場(chǎng)新人當(dāng)心焦慮障礙[N];中國(guó)醫(yī)藥報(bào);2012年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 盧靜;綜合醫(yī)院門診患者抑郁/焦慮障礙現(xiàn)況調(diào)查[D];中國(guó)協(xié)和醫(yī)科大學(xué);2008年

2 劉軍;電針焦慮方治療中風(fēng)后焦慮障礙的臨床療效評(píng)價(jià)[D];中國(guó)中醫(yī)科學(xué)院;2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王敏;焦慮障礙患者依戀模式的相關(guān)關(guān)系研究[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué);2015年

2 肖輝;帕金森病患者伴發(fā)焦慮障礙的相關(guān)因素分析[D];昆明醫(yī)科大學(xué);2015年

3 董瑞賓;女性癲癇患者合并抑郁焦慮障礙的相關(guān)影響因素分析[D];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué);2015年

4 陳玉狀;丁元慶教授治療焦慮障礙臨床總結(jié)與規(guī)律探討[D];山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2015年

5 孟欣;“通督安神”針刺法治療中風(fēng)后焦慮障礙的臨床觀察[D];黑龍江中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2017年

6 郭瑾;針刺配合音樂療法治療中風(fēng)后焦慮障礙的臨床研究[D];云南中醫(yī)學(xué)院;2017年

7 張曉南;大連市焦慮障礙患病率及相關(guān)因素研究[D];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué);2010年

8 陳光美;焦慮障礙的人格特征與蛋白組學(xué)的相關(guān)性研究[D];瀘州醫(yī)學(xué)院;2011年

9 王靜怡;成人癲癇伴發(fā)焦慮障礙的調(diào)查分析[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年

10 王威;沈陽(yáng)市綜合醫(yī)院內(nèi)科門診焦慮障礙患病率與醫(yī)生識(shí)別率現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查[D];中國(guó)醫(yī)科大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：2143659