本文選題：桂方傷痛膏 + 扶他林乳膠劑�。� 參考：《廣西中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:探討自擬中藥桂方傷痛膏結(jié)合手法治療急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷的臨床療效,探求其中臨床療效的差異,并對(duì)其中治療原理進(jìn)行初步分析,以求總結(jié)出一種簡(jiǎn)便效廉的治療方案。方法:研究中共收錄60例急性踝關(guān)節(jié)內(nèi)翻扭傷的患者,隨機(jī)分為桂方傷痛膏結(jié)合手法治療的觀察組及扶他林乳膠劑結(jié)合手法治療的對(duì)照組。其中男性37例,女性23例,年齡在15~60歲之間。以《中醫(yī)病證診斷療效標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》(1994年)中關(guān)于踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷部分作為診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及治療后療效判定指標(biāo),并根據(jù)治療前后x線正位片踝穴寬度、患踝腫脹程度、關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度、VAS疼痛評(píng)分的變化情況進(jìn)行對(duì)比,來(lái)觀察兩種治療方案的治療效果,以及桂方傷痛膏與扶他林乳膠劑對(duì)比的療效特點(diǎn)。將研究所得數(shù)據(jù)通過(guò)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析整理,對(duì)兩種療法得出科學(xué)性、系統(tǒng)性的評(píng)價(jià)。結(jié)果:1.兩組患者治療前在性別、年齡、病程、踝穴寬度、患踝腫脹程度、關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度、VAS疼痛評(píng)分比較中差異均不具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),表明治療前組間基線一致,具有可比性。2.兩組患者治療前后踝穴寬度的組間對(duì)比差異并無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),治療前后的組內(nèi)對(duì)比差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),表明急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷后發(fā)生踝穴形態(tài)改變,兩種治療方法均能恢復(fù)踝關(guān)節(jié)的解剖位置。3.兩組患者患踝腫脹程度的對(duì)比中,兩組治療前后的組內(nèi)對(duì)比差異均具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),表明兩種療法均可改善患踝腫脹。而組間對(duì)比中,治療6天、9天后比較差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),桂方傷痛膏組的消腫效果更優(yōu)。4.兩組患者治療前后關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度的組間對(duì)比差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),桂方傷痛膏在改善急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷后關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度方面更有優(yōu)勢(shì)。5.兩組治療前后VAS疼痛評(píng)分比較,組內(nèi)對(duì)比差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),可看出兩種療法均起到了止痛效果。治療后兩組相比較,兩組間差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),扶他林乳膠劑組的止痛效果更強(qiáng)。治療結(jié)束1月后的組間對(duì)比,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),表明兩種治療都取得不錯(cuò)的遠(yuǎn)期效果。6.兩組療效比較,治療后總有效率均為100%,在總有效率上并無(wú)差異。但觀察組治愈數(shù)上占優(yōu),治愈率優(yōu)于對(duì)照組。結(jié)論:急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷的治療中正骨復(fù)位可及時(shí)糾正踝關(guān)節(jié)的錯(cuò)位,此方法迅速有效,而桂方傷痛膏在消腫、改善關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)障礙中具有優(yōu)勢(shì),扶他林乳膠劑作為經(jīng)典的非甾體抗炎藥,在緩解軟組織損傷后的疼痛中得到到廣泛認(rèn)可。實(shí)際臨床急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷的治療中,可考慮正骨復(fù)位后,桂方傷痛膏與扶他林乳膠劑聯(lián)合應(yīng)用,以發(fā)揮各自優(yōu)勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:Objective: To explore the clinical effect of the combined manipulation of Gui Fang Shang Tong paste combined with manipulation in the treatment of acute ankle sprain, and to explore the difference in the clinical effect, and to make a preliminary analysis of the principle of treatment in order to sum up a simple and efficient treatment scheme. Methods: a total of 60 patients with acute ankle varus sprain were collected and randomly divided. The control group was treated with Guifang Yi Tong ointment combined with manipulative treatment and the combined manipulation of vitamin A in the control group, of which 37 men and 23 women were aged between 15~60 years. The diagnosis standard of ankle joint sprain in 1994 (1994) was used as the diagnostic criterion and the evaluation index of the curative effect after treatment, and according to the X before and after treatment. The width of the line position of the ankle, the degree of swelling of the ankle, the degree of joint activity, and the change of the VAS pain score were compared to observe the therapeutic effect of the two treatments, and the curative effect of the comparison between the ointment ointment and the cream of the cream of the cream. The data obtained by the study were statistically analyzed, and the two treatments were scientific and systematic. Results: 1. the differences in sex, age, course of disease, ankle width, ankle swelling, joint activity and VAS pain score were not statistically significant before treatment in two groups (P0.05), indicating that the baseline between groups before treatment was consistent, and there was no statistical difference between group.2. two groups before and after treatment. P0.05, the differences in the group before and after treatment were statistically significant (P0.05), indicating the morphological changes of the ankle points after the acute ankle sprain, and the two treatments could restore the anatomical position of the ankle joint in the comparison of the degree of ankle swelling in the two groups of.3. groups, and the difference in the comparison between the two groups before and after the treatment was statistically significant (P 0.05), indicating that the two treatments could improve the swelling of the ankle. In the group contrast, the treatment was 6 days and 9 days later, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The swelling effect of the group of Gui Fang Tong Tong ointment was better than that of the group of.4. two. The difference of the joint activity between the two groups before and after treatment was statistically significant (P0.05), and the Gui Fang Tong Tong ointment was improved in the acute ankle joint. The degree of joint activity after sprain was more advantageous than the VAS pain score of.5. two groups before and after treatment. The difference in the contrast between the groups was statistically significant (P0.05), and the two treatments all had the analgesic effect. The difference between the two groups after treatment was statistically significant (P0.05), and the analgesic effect of the cream group was stronger. The difference between the groups after January was not statistically significant (P0.05), indicating that the two treatments had good long-term effects in.6. two groups, the total effective rate was 100%, and there was no difference in the total effective rate. However, the cure rate of the observation group was superior and the cure rate was superior to that of the contrast group. Conclusion: the treatment of acute ankle sprain is the bone reduction in the treatment of acute ankle sprain. It is quick and effective to correct the dislocation of the ankle joint in time, and the Gui Fang Tong Tong ointment has advantages in reducing swelling and improving joint activity. As a classic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, the cream is widely recognized in alleviating the pain after soft tissue injury. In the treatment of actual acute ankle sprains, the bone can be considered as a bone. After the reduction, the Kui Fang pain paste and the combination of the cream of the agent are effective in giving full play to their advantages.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：R274.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李慶舜;曹雯麗;李萬(wàn)林;;火針加超微針刀治療急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷17例臨床效果觀察[J];中國(guó)社區(qū)醫(yī)師;2016年30期

2 賴曉榕;何建平;陳彥震;黃倩;;自擬消腫膏治療早期踝扭傷腫脹153例[J];江西中醫(yī)藥;2016年10期

3 於志華;范新華;;踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷的MRI診斷[J];醫(yī)學(xué)影像學(xué)雜志;2016年09期

4 吳鳳榮;曾聰彥;戴衛(wèi)波;高玉橋;胡瑩;林慧;;寬筋藤水提液鎮(zhèn)痛抗炎作用的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];中華中醫(yī)藥學(xué)刊;2016年07期

5 李睿;王子明;杜全印;王雨;熊雁;王愛(ài)民;;中國(guó)西南人踝關(guān)節(jié)X線片形態(tài)學(xué)參數(shù)的初步研究[J];中國(guó)矯形外科雜志;2016年11期

6 黨捍東;;針刺配合刺絡(luò)拔罐治療急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷的效果分析[J];中外醫(yī)學(xué)研究;2016年13期

7 謝冬明;黎穎賢;賀振泉;;淺析踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷的診斷及針灸推拿對(duì)其的治療[J];中醫(yī)臨床研究;2016年11期

8 蔡群斌;黃楓;鄭曉輝;鄒澤隆;;陳基長(zhǎng)教授治療急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷經(jīng)驗(yàn)淺析[J];中國(guó)中醫(yī)骨傷科雜志;2016年02期

9 屈秉成;;渥太華踝關(guān)節(jié)準(zhǔn)則作用的局限性研究[J];世界最新醫(yī)學(xué)信息文摘;2016年07期

10 孟佳珩;姜益常;;針刺放血療法治療急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷臨床觀察[J];中國(guó)中醫(yī)急癥;2015年12期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 王小麗;;踝足部疾病針刀臨床誤診誤治的探討[A];中華中醫(yī)藥學(xué)會(huì)針刀醫(yī)學(xué)分會(huì)二00七年度學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 矢建國(guó)(Joseph);飛騰八法結(jié)合踝三針治療急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷的臨床研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2015年

2 陸兔林;中藥莪術(shù)有效物質(zhì)及飲片規(guī)范化研究[D];南京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 梁海松;穴位注射療法治療急性踝關(guān)節(jié)內(nèi)翻扭傷的臨床療效觀察[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2014年

2 丁洪磊;搖拔戳手法治療急性外踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷的臨床研究[D];北京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2013年

3 王鑫;蘇木行血祛瘀活性成分研究[D];濟(jì)南大學(xué);2013年

4 靳昊;傳統(tǒng)維醫(yī)外固定治療急性踝關(guān)節(jié)扭傷的臨床觀察[D];新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué);2012年

5 張曉輝;節(jié)傷湯內(nèi)服及節(jié)傷散外洗治療踝關(guān)節(jié)急性扭傷的臨床研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2009年

6 周玉慶;籃球?qū)Ｐ迣W(xué)生踝關(guān)節(jié)運(yùn)動(dòng)損傷流行病學(xué)調(diào)查及致因研究[D];武漢體育學(xué)院;2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1990207