【摘要】：作者主要采用教學實驗法,比較了兩種經(jīng)典的網(wǎng)球教學方式——指令型教學方式、啟發(fā)型教學方式在初中生網(wǎng)球初學者中的不同教學效果。作者從廣州開發(fā)區(qū)國際網(wǎng)球學校和科學城中學隨機抽取80名初中二年級學生,經(jīng)過篩選得到最終用于實驗的40名初中生網(wǎng)球初學者,將其分成兩個教學組,兩組在性別、年齡、身高、體重、4X10米折返跑成績、俯臥撐成績、網(wǎng)球成績上均無顯著差異。實驗分別對兩組進行指令型教學和啟發(fā)型教學,并從網(wǎng)球教學成績、網(wǎng)球興趣培養(yǎng)和樂群性培養(yǎng)三個方面考察了兩種教學方式的不同教學效果,結果如下:(1)啟發(fā)型和指令型兩種教學方式,學生網(wǎng)球技能的都得到了提高。(2)對于正手擊球技能的學習,指令型教學方式在前期表現(xiàn)出了更高的效率,而啟發(fā)型的優(yōu)勢則到后期逐漸體現(xiàn)出來。總體來說這一模式?jīng)]有出現(xiàn)性別傾向。(3)對于反手擊球的學習,指令型在前期與啟發(fā)型具有相似的教學效果,而啟發(fā)型的優(yōu)勢則到后期逐漸體現(xiàn)出來,最后超過指令型。女初中生中出現(xiàn)的模式與總體中發(fā)現(xiàn)的模式相同,但是對于男生而言這一模式則發(fā)生細微改變,前期指令性教學方式的效果要好于啟發(fā)型。(4)對于上手發(fā)球的學習,在前期指令型和啟發(fā)型教學效果差不多,而啟發(fā)型的優(yōu)勢則到后期逐漸體現(xiàn)出來,最后超過指令型�？傮w中發(fā)現(xiàn)的這一模式在男、女初中生中同樣存在。(5)在興趣培養(yǎng)上,啟發(fā)式教學方式要顯著好于指令式,尤其在提高探索性、愉悅感、總體興趣、新穎性維度上優(yōu)勢明顯。在總體中發(fā)現(xiàn)的這種優(yōu)勢在女初中生中同樣存在,在男初中生中則稍有減弱。(6)在樂群性上,不論是總體,還是男初中生或者女初中生群體中,啟發(fā)式教學方式小組的得分都顯著高于指令式教學方式小組。同時,在樂群性培養(yǎng)上,相比較男生而言,女生對這兩種教學方式適應上產(chǎn)生的差異更大,即更容易在指令型教學方式下體驗到更差的人際關系,也容易在啟發(fā)型教學方式下體驗到更好的人際關系。
[Abstract]:The author mainly adopts the teaching experiment method to compare the different teaching effects of two classical tennis teaching methods, the instruction teaching method and the heuristic teaching method in junior high school tennis beginners. The author randomly selected 80 junior middle school sophomores from Guangzhou Development Zone International Tennis School and Science City Middle School, and selected 40 junior high school students who were finally used in the experiment, and divided them into two teaching groups, two groups in gender and age. There were no significant differences in height, weight, 4X10 meter return race, push-ups and tennis scores. The experiment carries on instruction teaching and heuristic teaching to the two groups, and investigates the different teaching effects of the two teaching methods from three aspects: tennis teaching achievement, tennis interest cultivation and music group training. The results are as follows: (1) both heuristic and instructive teaching methods have improved the students' tennis skills. (2) for the forehand batting skills, the instruction teaching method has shown a higher efficiency in the early stage. The advantage of heuristic is gradually reflected in the later stage. Generally speaking, there is no gender tendency in this model. (3) for backhand batting learning, instruction type has similar teaching effect to heuristic type in the early stage, but the advantage of heuristic type gradually manifests in the later stage, and finally surpasses the command type. The pattern appeared in female junior high school students was the same as the pattern found in the whole, but for boys, the pattern changed slightly, and the effect of early instruction teaching was better than that of heuristic teaching. (4) for the learning of the first hand serve, the effect of instruction teaching was better than that of heuristic teaching. The effect of instruction and heuristic teaching is similar in the early stage, but the advantage of heuristic teaching is gradually reflected in the later stage, and finally surpasses the command type. In general, this pattern is also found in male and female junior high school students. (5) in interest cultivation, heuristic teaching is better than instruction, especially in improving exploratory, pleasant and overall interest. The advantage of novelty dimension is obvious. The advantages found in the whole are also found in the female junior high school students, but slightly weakened in the male junior high school students. (6) in the music group, whether in general, male junior high school students or female junior high school students, The score of heuristic teaching group was significantly higher than that of instruction teaching group. At the same time, in the cultivation of group music, compared with boys, girls have greater differences in adaptation to these two teaching methods, that is, they are more likely to experience worse interpersonal relationships in the instruction teaching mode. It is also easy to experience better interpersonal relationships in heuristic teaching.
【學位授予單位】：北京體育大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G633.96

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 韓洋雷;劉紅波;;改革開放后我國體育教學方式研究的發(fā)展歷程[J];運動;2014年12期

2 湯亞平;龍亞軍;;高校體育術課教師教學方式創(chuàng)新與教學特色的構建[J];當代體育科技;2013年31期

3 田戰(zhàn)成;;初中體育教學中小組“互幫”式學習方式淺探[J];科技創(chuàng)新導報;2013年30期

4 馬立新;;基于職校生實際的體育教學組織方式探索[J];當代體育科技;2013年18期

5 劉慶云;;淺談新課標下的小學體育教學方式[J];科教文匯(下旬刊);2013年04期

6 劉波;田德林;;基于培養(yǎng)學生職業(yè)能力的高校體育教學方式[J];昭通學院學報;2013年02期

7 戴晶晶;;分層式教學方式在新課改情況下高中體育教育中的應用[J];當代體育科技;2012年16期

8 王海明;鄒克寧;李屹峰;王相飛;封晟;王珂;李楠;;“快易”網(wǎng)球教學法在高校網(wǎng)球課教學中應用的實驗研究[J];武漢體育學院學報;2012年05期

9 周妍;李啟迪;;論體育教學方式的內(nèi)涵及其變革[J];北京體育大學學報;2012年04期

10 李鴻亮;;大學生身體自我觀念與體育教學干預方式的運用[J];價值工程;2012年07期

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 桂姍姍;體育游戲在青少年業(yè)余網(wǎng)球教學中的應用研究[D];上海體育學院;2014年

2 王康鋒;基于成功體育理念將慢速網(wǎng)球引入廣西高校公體網(wǎng)球選項課教學的研究[D];廣西民族大學;2012年

3 劉朝根;上海市閔行區(qū)中小學網(wǎng)球課開展現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查與研究[D];上海師范大學;2012年

4 尹松;網(wǎng)球運動對中學生體質(zhì)健康影響的研究[D];西南大學;2010年

5 秦鵬;表象訓練在高校網(wǎng)球教學中對發(fā)球成功率的實驗研究[D];武漢體育學院;2009年

6 王偉;情緒情感體驗教學法在高校網(wǎng)球教學中的應用研究[D];東北師范大學;2008年

7 付道領;基于建構主義理論的教學模式運用于體育教學的實證研究[D];西南大學;2008年

8 陳祥慧;合作學習教學模式在體育院系網(wǎng)球教學中的應用研究[D];武漢體育學院;2007年

9 崔鐵成;技能掌握式與啟發(fā)式教學模式在普通高校網(wǎng)球課中應用的實驗研究[D];北京體育大學;2007年

10 趙立霞;湖北省大學生網(wǎng)球運動參與動機的比較研究[D];武漢體育學院;2006年

，

本文編號：2371844