初中物理教師TPACK個(gè)案研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-04 21:43
【摘要】：整合技術(shù)的學(xué)科教學(xué)法知識(shí)(Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge)是教師使用技術(shù)進(jìn)行優(yōu)質(zhì)教學(xué)的基礎(chǔ),是教師在信息技術(shù)環(huán)境下教學(xué)必須具有的知識(shí)。為了了解當(dāng)前實(shí)際教學(xué)環(huán)境下初中物理教師TPACK特征,得到基于實(shí)際教學(xué)過(guò)程的客觀事實(shí),研究者開展了一項(xiàng)個(gè)案研究,并探討了如下兩個(gè)問(wèn)題:(1)非專家型教師與專家型教師的TPACK具有什么特征?(2)兩位教師的TPACK特征具有哪些差異?本研究確立非專家型教師與專家型教師各一名,以“整合”的觀點(diǎn)編制了《初中物理教師TPACK課堂觀察記錄表》與《初中物理教師TPACK訪談提綱》,使用課堂觀察(配合錄像)、訪談的方法收集資料,分析兩位教師的TPACK特征,得到了以下6方面的結(jié)果:整合技術(shù)教授物理的整體觀念方面,非專家型教師的物理教學(xué)觀念較專家型教師有一定差距,過(guò)分重視學(xué)生基礎(chǔ)知識(shí)、基本能力的培養(yǎng);專家型教師在課外利用技術(shù)的多樣性方面不如非專家型教師靈活。整合技術(shù)的課程內(nèi)容知識(shí)方面,非專家型教師利用技術(shù)呈現(xiàn)的內(nèi)容主要來(lái)源于教材,在創(chuàng)新程度、與生活聯(lián)系的密切性方面較專家型教師稍微欠缺。整合技術(shù)教授學(xué)生理解某一物理特定主題的知識(shí)方面,與專家型教師相比,非專家型教師缺乏利用技術(shù)幫助學(xué)生更好地理解重難點(diǎn)的知識(shí),技術(shù)融入層次較低,且不能借助技術(shù)為學(xué)生創(chuàng)造自主學(xué)習(xí)的環(huán)境。整合技術(shù)教授某一特定物理主題的教學(xué)策略和方法知識(shí)方面,非專家型教師較專家型教師在利用技術(shù)創(chuàng)造情境時(shí)缺乏突破教材內(nèi)容限制的表現(xiàn);在處理學(xué)生錯(cuò)誤時(shí),讓學(xué)生主動(dòng)利用技術(shù)方面非專家型教師不如專家教師;專家型教師在設(shè)置任務(wù)時(shí)利用技術(shù)的有效程度不如非專家型教師。整合技術(shù)對(duì)某一物理主題評(píng)價(jià)的知識(shí)方面,非專家型教師比專家型教師更擅長(zhǎng)讓學(xué)生利用技術(shù)進(jìn)行展示,從而了解學(xué)生情況。TPACK的操作體現(xiàn)方面,非專家型教師在利用“自制”技術(shù)類型方面不如專家型教師。在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了促進(jìn)中學(xué)物理教學(xué)教師TPACK的發(fā)展與專業(yè)化發(fā)展的“非專家型教師應(yīng)重視利用技術(shù)呈現(xiàn)的內(nèi)容與現(xiàn)實(shí)生活的聯(lián)系性”等8項(xiàng)建議。
[Abstract]:The knowledge of subject teaching method (Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge) which integrates technology is the basis for teachers to use technology to carry out high quality teaching and is the knowledge that teachers must possess in the environment of information technology. In order to understand the TPACK characteristics of junior high school physics teachers in the actual teaching environment and obtain the objective facts based on the actual teaching process, the researcher carried out a case study. Two questions are discussed as follows: (1) what are the characteristics of TPACK between non-expert teachers and expert teachers? (2) what are the differences between the TPACK characteristics of the two teachers? This study establishes one non-expert teacher and one expert teacher. From the viewpoint of "integration", the author compiled the TPACK classroom observation record form of junior middle school physics teachers and the outline of TPACK interview of junior middle school physics teachers, and analyzed the TPACK characteristics of the two teachers by means of classroom observation (video recording) and interview method. The results are as follows: integrating the whole concept of technology teaching physics, there is a certain gap between non-expert teachers and expert teachers in physics teaching, so they pay too much attention to the cultivation of students' basic knowledge and basic ability; Expert-type teachers are less flexible than non-expert teachers in the diversity of extracurricular utilization techniques. In the aspect of integrating the knowledge of curriculum content of technology, the content presented by non-expert teachers mainly comes from teaching materials, which is less than that of expert teachers in terms of innovation degree and close relationship with life. Integration techniques teach students to understand the knowledge of a specific subject of physics. Compared with expert teachers, non-expert teachers lack the knowledge to help students understand the difficult and important problems better, and the level of technology integration is lower. And can not use technology for students to create independent learning environment. In the aspect of integrating technology to teach teaching strategies and methods on a specific physics subject, non-expert teachers lack the performance of breaking through the limits of teaching material content when using technology to create situations, and when dealing with students' mistakes, non-expert teachers lack the performance of breaking through the limits of teaching materials when using technology to create situations. The non-expert teachers are not as good as the expert teachers, and the expert teachers are not as effective as the non-expert teachers in setting up their tasks. In the aspect of integrating technology to evaluate the knowledge of a physics subject, non-expert teachers are better than expert teachers in making students use technology to demonstrate, so as to understand the operational aspects of students. TPACK. Non-expert teachers are inferior to expert teachers in using self-made technology. On the basis of this, this paper puts forward eight suggestions to promote the development and specialization of TPACK in physics teaching teachers in middle schools, such as "the non-expert teachers should attach importance to the connection between the content presented by technology and the real life".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：G633.7
[Abstract]:The knowledge of subject teaching method (Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge) which integrates technology is the basis for teachers to use technology to carry out high quality teaching and is the knowledge that teachers must possess in the environment of information technology. In order to understand the TPACK characteristics of junior high school physics teachers in the actual teaching environment and obtain the objective facts based on the actual teaching process, the researcher carried out a case study. Two questions are discussed as follows: (1) what are the characteristics of TPACK between non-expert teachers and expert teachers? (2) what are the differences between the TPACK characteristics of the two teachers? This study establishes one non-expert teacher and one expert teacher. From the viewpoint of "integration", the author compiled the TPACK classroom observation record form of junior middle school physics teachers and the outline of TPACK interview of junior middle school physics teachers, and analyzed the TPACK characteristics of the two teachers by means of classroom observation (video recording) and interview method. The results are as follows: integrating the whole concept of technology teaching physics, there is a certain gap between non-expert teachers and expert teachers in physics teaching, so they pay too much attention to the cultivation of students' basic knowledge and basic ability; Expert-type teachers are less flexible than non-expert teachers in the diversity of extracurricular utilization techniques. In the aspect of integrating the knowledge of curriculum content of technology, the content presented by non-expert teachers mainly comes from teaching materials, which is less than that of expert teachers in terms of innovation degree and close relationship with life. Integration techniques teach students to understand the knowledge of a specific subject of physics. Compared with expert teachers, non-expert teachers lack the knowledge to help students understand the difficult and important problems better, and the level of technology integration is lower. And can not use technology for students to create independent learning environment. In the aspect of integrating technology to teach teaching strategies and methods on a specific physics subject, non-expert teachers lack the performance of breaking through the limits of teaching material content when using technology to create situations, and when dealing with students' mistakes, non-expert teachers lack the performance of breaking through the limits of teaching materials when using technology to create situations. The non-expert teachers are not as good as the expert teachers, and the expert teachers are not as effective as the non-expert teachers in setting up their tasks. In the aspect of integrating technology to evaluate the knowledge of a physics subject, non-expert teachers are better than expert teachers in making students use technology to demonstrate, so as to understand the operational aspects of students. TPACK. Non-expert teachers are inferior to expert teachers in using self-made technology. On the basis of this, this paper puts forward eight suggestions to promote the development and specialization of TPACK in physics teaching teachers in middle schools, such as "the non-expert teachers should attach importance to the connection between the content presented by technology and the real life".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：G633.7
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 肖映雪;論中小學(xué)專家型教師的基本特征與培養(yǎng)[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期
2 劉巖;論專家型教師的素質(zhì)及培養(yǎng)[J];鞍山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期
3 金春蘭;以教育科研為動(dòng)力 加速向?qū)＜倚徒處熮D(zhuǎn)變[J];黑龍江教育;2001年12期
4 崔允o7;走向?qū)＜倚徒處焄J];人民教育;2002年06期
5 李光;談專家型教師的素質(zhì)及培養(yǎng)[J];中國(guó)成人教育;2002年03期
6 侯愛(ài)民;研究性學(xué)習(xí)與專家型教師[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2002年08期
7 陳翠榮;對(duì)培養(yǎng)專家型教師的思考[J];集美大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2002年04期
8 宋廣文,都榮勝;專家型教師的研究及其對(duì)教師成長(zhǎng)的啟示[J];當(dāng)代教育科學(xué);2003年01期
9 吳義昌;中美專家型教師標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及比較[J];教育科學(xué)研究;2003年03期
10 吳指揮;培養(yǎng)專家型教師促進(jìn)專業(yè)化發(fā)展[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2003年04期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條
1 王毓s，
本文編號(hào)：2251980
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2251980.html
最近更新
教材專著
