本文選題：高中英語 + 學(xué)困生��； 參考：《山東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：學(xué)困生主要指智力正常但成績(jī)較差的學(xué)生。學(xué)困生往往表現(xiàn)為自覺性差、沒有自信、自卑感強(qiáng)、不思進(jìn)取。據(jù)調(diào)查顯示,學(xué)困生的比例一般占學(xué)生總?cè)藬?shù)的8%到10%,有的學(xué)校甚至達(dá)到15%。學(xué)困生已成為一個(gè)不可忽視的群體。研究并轉(zhuǎn)化學(xué)困生,遏制學(xué)困生人數(shù)的增長(zhǎng)很有必要。教育的最終目的是培養(yǎng)對(duì)社會(huì)有用的人才,并使每一個(gè)受過教育的人都人盡其用。因此,促進(jìn)學(xué)困生轉(zhuǎn)化意義重大。英語學(xué)困生普遍認(rèn)為成績(jī)不好與自身詞匯量?jī)?chǔ)備小有很大關(guān)系。學(xué)困生對(duì)詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略如果有正確認(rèn)知并能合理使用,很可能會(huì)擴(kuò)大詞匯量,進(jìn)而能提高英語綜合能力和自學(xué)能力。本研究以高一英語學(xué)困生的詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略為研究對(duì)象,對(duì)山東德州市寧津縣第一中學(xué)高一部分學(xué)困生進(jìn)行研究。本研究所選取的100名學(xué)生英語綜合測(cè)試成績(jī)不能達(dá)到考綱要求且詞匯量未達(dá)到新課標(biāo)五級(jí)要求。學(xué)困生的共同特點(diǎn)是:英語綜合能力低下,詞匯量少,自認(rèn)為英語學(xué)習(xí)比較困難,缺乏良好的學(xué)習(xí)習(xí)慣和合適的學(xué)習(xí)方法。本研究還試圖將學(xué)困生分為兩類:一,綜合排名靠前但英語成績(jī)不及格的學(xué)困生;二,綜合排名靠后且英語成績(jī)不及格的學(xué)困生。本研究主要回答以下3個(gè)問題:(1)目前學(xué)困生所普遍使用的詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略主要有哪些?(2)實(shí)驗(yàn)后學(xué)困生所使用的詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略是否有變化?(3)不同種類學(xué)困生實(shí)驗(yàn)前后所使用的詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略是否相同?通過對(duì)學(xué)困生進(jìn)行問卷調(diào)查、訪談、詞匯測(cè)試、詞匯策略實(shí)驗(yàn)后,對(duì)結(jié)果進(jìn)行定量和定性分析,筆者得到如下結(jié)論:1.在詞匯學(xué)習(xí)過程中,學(xué)困生很少使用資源策略、社交情感策略和元認(rèn)知策略,有時(shí)使用認(rèn)知策略�？傮w而言,學(xué)困生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略使用頻率偏低;2.實(shí)驗(yàn)后,學(xué)困生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略有變化,使用頻率普遍提高,并且學(xué)困生詞匯量和語言綜合能力相對(duì)有很大提高;3.不同種類學(xué)困生在資源策略和社交情感策略方面使用頻率有不同。本研究試圖通過對(duì)100名學(xué)困生進(jìn)行研究實(shí)驗(yàn),獲得有關(guān)英語學(xué)困生的寶貴資料和數(shù)據(jù),了解學(xué)困生學(xué)習(xí)過程中詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略使用的數(shù)量和頻率,不同種類學(xué)困生使用詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略的特點(diǎn),詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略對(duì)詞匯量和語言綜合能力的影響等。筆者通過研究試圖探尋如何有效地幫助學(xué)困生將策略訓(xùn)練融入日常英語學(xué)習(xí)中,提高學(xué)困生的策略意識(shí),幫助學(xué)困生提高學(xué)習(xí)效率和學(xué)習(xí)能力,同時(shí)也為其他教師幫助學(xué)困生克服學(xué)習(xí)障礙提供經(jīng)驗(yàn)。本研究的局限性在于調(diào)查的樣本數(shù)量小,結(jié)果的概括性有待進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證,調(diào)查對(duì)象僅限于寧津一中的部分學(xué)困生,其普遍性受到一定影響。
[Abstract]:Students with learning difficulties mainly refer to students with normal intelligence but poor grades. Students with learning difficulties often show poor self-consciousness, no self-confidence, a strong sense of inferiority complex, do not want to forge ahead. According to the survey, the proportion of students with learning difficulties generally accounts for 8% to 10% of the total number of students, and some schools even reach 15%. Students with learning difficulties have become a group that can not be ignored. It is necessary to study and transform the students with learning difficulties and curb the growth of the number of students with learning difficulties. The ultimate goal of education is to cultivate useful talents for society and to make every educated man do his best. Therefore, it is of great significance to promote the transformation of students with learning difficulties. Students with English learning disabilities generally agree that poor performance is related to their small vocabulary reserves. If students with learning difficulties have a correct understanding of vocabulary learning strategies and can use them reasonably, they may expand their vocabulary and then improve their English comprehensive ability and self-study ability. This study focuses on the vocabulary learning strategies of the students with English learning difficulties in senior one, and studies the students with learning difficulties in the first Middle School of Ningjin County in Dezhou City, Shandong Province. The English comprehensive test scores of 100 students in this study are not up to the requirements of the syllabus and the vocabulary is not up to the requirements of CET-5 of the new curriculum. The common characteristics of the students with learning difficulties are: low comprehensive English ability, small vocabulary, self-perceived English learning difficulties, lack of good learning habits and appropriate learning methods. This study also attempts to divide the students with learning difficulties into two categories: one is the students with learning difficulties who are at the top of the comprehensive ranking but fail in English, and the other is the students with learning difficulties who are at the bottom of the comprehensive ranking and who fail in English. This study mainly answers the following three questions: 1) which vocabulary learning strategies are commonly used by students with learning disabilities at present? (2) whether the vocabulary learning strategies used by students with learning disabilities have changed after the experiment? (3) whether vocabulary learning strategies used by students with learning difficulties of different types have changed before and after the experiment Are the vocabulary learning strategies the same? Based on the questionnaire, interview, vocabulary test and vocabulary strategy experiment, the author makes a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the results, and reaches the following conclusion: 1. In the process of vocabulary learning, students with learning disabilities seldom use resource strategies, social affective strategies, metacognitive strategies, and sometimes cognitive strategies. In general, the use of vocabulary learning strategies of students with learning disabilities is low. After the experiment, the vocabulary learning strategies of the students with learning difficulties have been changed, the frequency of use has been increased generally, and the vocabulary size and the comprehensive language ability of the students with learning difficulties have greatly improved. Different types of students with learning disabilities use different resource strategies and social affective strategies. This study attempts to obtain valuable data and data on 100 students with learning disabilities in order to understand the number and frequency of vocabulary learning strategies used by students with learning disabilities. The characteristics of different types of students with learning disabilities in using vocabulary learning strategies, the influence of vocabulary learning strategies on vocabulary size and language synthesis ability. Through the research, the author tries to explore how to effectively help the students with learning difficulties to integrate strategy training into their daily English learning, to improve their strategic awareness, and to help them improve their learning efficiency and learning ability. At the same time for other teachers to help students with learning difficulties overcome learning barriers to provide experience. The limitation of this study is that the number of samples is small and the generality of the results needs to be further verified. The objects of investigation are only part of the students with learning difficulties in Ningjin No. 1 Middle School whose universality is affected to a certain extent.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G633.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梅春麗;;淺談高中英語“學(xué)困生”的詞匯教學(xué)策略[J];新課程(下);2014年11期

2 付小云;;高三英語學(xué)困生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)障礙成因[J];新課程學(xué)習(xí)(上);2014年06期

3 王麗軍;;英語弱班學(xué)困生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)困境分析及應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];教師;2014年14期

4 李云晶;;高中英語學(xué)困生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略的研究[J];中國科教創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)刊;2014年06期

5 魏恒建;;高中生英語詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略與高考成績(jī)的關(guān)系研究[J];英語教師;2013年01期

6 劉維杰;;對(duì)高中英語“學(xué)困生”詞匯教學(xué)的探索與建議[J];現(xiàn)代教育科學(xué);2010年10期

7 李珊珊;;高中學(xué)困生英語詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];云南財(cái)貿(mào)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

8 高越;非英語專業(yè)大學(xué)生詞匯策略研究[J];國外外語教學(xué);2004年03期

9 豐玉芳;英語專業(yè)高低年級(jí)學(xué)生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略比較研究[J];外語界;2003年02期

10 吳霞,王薔;非英語專業(yè)本科學(xué)生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;1998年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 史磊磊;高二英語學(xué)困生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略的實(shí)證研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2016年

2 宋娓娓;高中英語優(yōu)等生與后進(jìn)生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略比較研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2014年

3 薛曉菲;農(nóng)村初中英語學(xué)困生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2014年

4 張國彪;高中英語學(xué)困生轉(zhuǎn)化的策略[D];山東師范大學(xué);2014年

5 李爽;高一學(xué)生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略使用情況的研究調(diào)查[D];天津師范大學(xué);2013年

6 余林瓊;高中英語學(xué)困生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略研究[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2012年

7 周小芳;對(duì)一名高二英語學(xué)困生進(jìn)行詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略指導(dǎo)的行動(dòng)研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2012年

8 汪祖名;高中英語學(xué)困生詞匯學(xué)習(xí)策略的研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2011年

9 郝立澤;論語境對(duì)高中英語學(xué)困生詞匯習(xí)得的影響[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2011年

10 張琴;高中學(xué)困生同伴關(guān)系的個(gè)案研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1878510