【摘要】：馬克思的經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué)是與唯物史觀并列的兩大發(fā)明,而不僅僅是唯物史觀的應(yīng)用和具體化�！顿Y本論》建立了人類(lèi)社會(huì)模式的經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué)典范,對(duì)其歷史來(lái)源和形成過(guò)程加以分析,可認(rèn)為《資本論》有四個(gè)底本。而以唯物史觀為底本,馬克思試圖揭露現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家的問(wèn)題就在于拋棄了資本主義社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)范疇的本質(zhì)差別,將其擴(kuò)大到人類(lèi)一切社會(huì)和時(shí)代。馬克思的經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué)要將唯物史觀作為考察的前提,把握不同社會(huì)形態(tài)的整體的、本質(zhì)的特征及各自差異�！顿Y本論》對(duì)資本主義積累的一般規(guī)律的證明,并不等于唯物史觀宣布的資本主義滅亡的必然性。
[Abstract]:Marx's economic science is two major inventions parallel to historical materialism, not only the application and concretization of historical materialism. "Capital" established the model of economic science of human social model, and analyzed its historical origin and forming process. It can be considered that there are four basic books in Capital. On the basis of historical materialism, Marx tries to reveal that the problem of modern economists lies in abandoning the essential difference of capitalist socio-economic category and extending it to all human societies and times. Marx's economic science should regard historical materialism as the premise of investigation, grasp the integral and essential characteristics of different social forms and their respective differences. The proof of the General Law of Capitalism accumulation in Capital It is not equal to the inevitability of the destruction of capitalism declared by historical materialism.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)哲學(xué)系暨外國(guó)哲學(xué)研究所;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“20世紀(jì)中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)哲學(xué)與馬克思主義哲學(xué)、西方哲學(xué)關(guān)系研究”(項(xiàng)目號(hào):13ZD056)的階段性成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B03

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 呂福新;對(duì)馬克思關(guān)于“資本主義積累一般規(guī)律”的一點(diǎn)理解[J];麗水師專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào);1982年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 莽冰洋;大衛(wèi)·哈維剝奪性積累理論述評(píng)[D];遼寧大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2461890