茶山的兩互作卦法
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-16 10:48
【摘要】：茶山丁若鏞在《周易四箋》中運用了推移、爻變、互體、物象四種解釋方法,其中,兩互作卦法屬于互體之理論。兩互法的由來可上溯至鄭玄和虞翻,此法之運用則首見于完顏亮入寇時會稽之士所行之筮例,然其不過是一個事例而已。后來,吳澄構建了兩互法體系。其體系與丁若鏞兩互作卦法大體一致,但又存在重要差異。吳澄的兩互法基于邵雍的先天易學,而丁若鏞則去除了先天易學的部分,僅擇取其中的兩互關系。另外,吳澄的兩互卦遵循了秩序井然的規(guī)則,但這種規(guī)則性卻未見于丁若鏞的兩互作卦法�？偟膩碚f,吳澄的兩互法僅停留在形式的層面,而丁若鏞卻將兩互作卦法廣泛地運用于《易》辭的解釋之中,這可以說是丁若鏞對互體說與兩互法的發(fā)展所做的重大貢獻。
[Abstract]:Ding Ruoyong used four interpretation methods in the fourth Notes of the Book of changes of Cha Shan, namely, the change of the lines, the mutual body, and the image of the object, among which, the method of two interplay hexagrams belongs to the theory of the mutual body. The origin of the two mutual methods can be traced back to Zheng Xuan and Yu Quan. Later, Wu Cheng constructed a system of two mutual laws. The system is consistent with Ding Ruoyong's divinatory method, but there are important differences. Wu Cheng's two-interaction method is based on Shao Yong's innate Yi learning, while Ding Ruoyong removes the part of congenital Yi learning and chooses only the two interrelations. In addition, Wu Cheng's two divinatory diagrams follow orderly rules, but this rule is not found in Ding Ruoyong's divinatory pattern. On the whole, Wu Cheng's two reciprocal methods only remain at the formal level, while Ding Ruoyong applies the two interaction divinatory diagrams widely in the interpretation of Yi ci, which can be said to be the significant contribution made by Ding Ruoyong to the development of the theory of mutual body and the development of the two mutual methods.
【作者單位】： 慶北大學校人文大學;韓國成均館大學儒學院;
【基金】：2016年韓國教育部和韓國研究財團Global Research Network program經(jīng)費資助(NRF-2016S1A2A2912286)
【分類號】：B221;B312
本文編號：2382211
[Abstract]:Ding Ruoyong used four interpretation methods in the fourth Notes of the Book of changes of Cha Shan, namely, the change of the lines, the mutual body, and the image of the object, among which, the method of two interplay hexagrams belongs to the theory of the mutual body. The origin of the two mutual methods can be traced back to Zheng Xuan and Yu Quan. Later, Wu Cheng constructed a system of two mutual laws. The system is consistent with Ding Ruoyong's divinatory method, but there are important differences. Wu Cheng's two-interaction method is based on Shao Yong's innate Yi learning, while Ding Ruoyong removes the part of congenital Yi learning and chooses only the two interrelations. In addition, Wu Cheng's two divinatory diagrams follow orderly rules, but this rule is not found in Ding Ruoyong's divinatory pattern. On the whole, Wu Cheng's two reciprocal methods only remain at the formal level, while Ding Ruoyong applies the two interaction divinatory diagrams widely in the interpretation of Yi ci, which can be said to be the significant contribution made by Ding Ruoyong to the development of the theory of mutual body and the development of the two mutual methods.
【作者單位】： 慶北大學校人文大學;韓國成均館大學儒學院;
【基金】：2016年韓國教育部和韓國研究財團Global Research Network program經(jīng)費資助(NRF-2016S1A2A2912286)
【分類號】：B221;B312
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前8條
1 宋載邵;李篪衡著《茶山丁若鏞經(jīng)學研究》[J];當代韓國;1997年02期
2 蒙培元;;丁若鏞的“仁學觀”[J];泉州師范學院學報;2006年01期
3 韓英;試論丁若鏞對朱子學的批判[J];當代韓國;2003年03期
4 方浩范;束景南;;丁若鏞實學中“仁”學思想體系的建構——孔孟仁學思想體系的復歸與繼承[J];孔子研究;2008年01期
5 姜日天;;丁若鏞的四氣本體[J];湖湘論壇;2012年06期
6 方浩范;;試論丁若鏞的天理人欲思想[J];延邊大學學報(社會科學版);2005年04期
7 馮琳;;丁若鏞象數(shù)易學方法初探[J];周易研究;2011年01期
8 崔冠華;;丁若鏞考辨古文《尚書》的基本理路——《梅氏書平》的邏輯基點[J];湖南大學學報(社會科學版);2009年03期
，本文編號：2382211
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2382211.html
