本文選題：海德格爾　切入點(diǎn)：轉(zhuǎn)向(Kehre)　出處：《學(xué)術(shù)月刊》2017年09期

【摘要】：以海德格爾《關(guān)于人道主義的書(shū)信》的發(fā)表為誘因,起于研究者對(duì)海德格爾思想發(fā)展歷程的探索,"轉(zhuǎn)向問(wèn)題"早已成為海德格爾研究中最重要的論題之一,對(duì)"海德格爾轉(zhuǎn)向"的談?wù)撘惨蚜餍杏诋?dāng)代的哲學(xué)研究語(yǔ)境。然而這個(gè)問(wèn)題的起源、發(fā)展、實(shí)質(zhì)以及啟示卻有待彰明。從哲學(xué)史的角度重提這個(gè)問(wèn)題,通過(guò)批判地回顧研究海德格爾轉(zhuǎn)向問(wèn)題的三個(gè)歷史階段,以及在海德格爾的原始語(yǔ)境、海德格爾與研究者的對(duì)話語(yǔ)境中重構(gòu)"轉(zhuǎn)向"的意義,不僅有助于廓清海德格爾"轉(zhuǎn)向"之實(shí)質(zhì),也有助于更加深入地探討海德格爾思想本身,同時(shí)對(duì)于澄清一般哲學(xué)研究語(yǔ)境中對(duì)海德格爾"轉(zhuǎn)向"的不恰當(dāng)引用也有所幫助。
[Abstract]:With the publication of Heidegger's Letters on humanitarianism as an inducement, from the researchers' exploration of Heidegger's thought development, "turning problem" has already become one of the most important topics in Heidegger's study.The discussion of Heidegger turn has also become popular in the contemporary philosophical context.However, the origin, development, essence and enlightenment of this problem need to be clarified.By critically reviewing the three historical stages of Heidegger's turn, and the significance of reconstructing "turn" in Heidegger's original context and in Heidegger's conversational context with researchers, this paper raises this question from the perspective of philosophical history.It is not only helpful to clarify the essence of Heidegger's "turn", but also to probe into Heidegger's thought itself more deeply, and to clarify the improper quotation of Heidegger's "turn" in the context of general philosophical research.
【作者單位】： 西安交通大學(xué)國(guó)外馬克思主義研究所;
【基金】：中國(guó)博士后科學(xué)基金面上資助項(xiàng)目(2017M613162) “西安交通大學(xué)新教師科研支持計(jì)劃”的資助
【分類號(hào)】：B516.54
，

本文編號(hào)：1720923