本文選題：名　切入點(diǎn)：字　出處：《杭州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：這里作者想要申論五個(gè)重點(diǎn):一則說(shuō)明義理有時(shí)可以先于訓(xùn)詁,有時(shí)則訓(xùn)詁宜先于義理,并無(wú)確定的途徑。二則借章太炎《原名》一文的論述說(shuō)明"名"的建立與系統(tǒng)化,和人類(lèi)對(duì)天地萬(wàn)物的認(rèn)知活動(dòng)密切相關(guān),研究"名"應(yīng)該從認(rèn)知的過(guò)程與限制思考先秦諸子開(kāi)展其"名"學(xué)的途徑。三則借《郭店楚簡(jiǎn)·大一生水》"名字章"之說(shuō),析論"名"與"字"的范疇。四則引張岱年《中國(guó)古典哲學(xué)概念范疇要論》,評(píng)述"名"、"字"、"概念"、"范疇"的糾葛,認(rèn)為四者難以區(qū)分,亦不宜勉強(qiáng)區(qū)分,因?yàn)闈h字具形音義統(tǒng)一的特性,"義"常與形音相糾纏。當(dāng)前要?jiǎng)?wù)是建立一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)便精準(zhǔn)的名稱,以統(tǒng)攝諸名。五則舉"中庸"、"獨(dú)"、"集義、集虛"、"性善"等四個(gè)例子,說(shuō)明研究范疇,不可囿于學(xué)派派別,而忽視了不同學(xué)派對(duì)于同一范疇或故意展現(xiàn)不同詮釋的可能。
[Abstract]:Here the author wants to explain five key points: one is to explain that righteousness and theory can sometimes be preceded by exegesis, and sometimes the exegesis should precede righteousness and theory, and there is no definite way to do so.Secondly, through the exposition of Zhang Taiyan's "original name", it is shown that the establishment and systematization of "name" is closely related to human cognition of everything.The study of "name" should consider the ways for the pre-Qin philosophers to carry out the study of "name" from the perspective of cognitive process and limitation.The third is to analyze the category of "name" and "character" by the theory of "name chapter" in the first year of Kuodian Chu bamboo slips.Quoting Zhang Dainian's Theory of Conceptual Category of Chinese Classical philosophy, commenting on the disputes between "name", "character", "concept" and "category", the author holds that the four are difficult to distinguish, nor should they be forced to distinguish.Because of the unity of shape and meaning of Chinese characters, meaning is often entangled with shape and sound.The immediate task is to establish a simple and precise name to govern the names.Five examples of "the mean", "independence", "collection of meaning, collection of void" and "good nature" show that the scope of research cannot be confined to the schools of thought, while neglecting the possibility of different schools showing different interpretations of the same category or intentionally.
【作者單位】： 香港教育大學(xué)文學(xué)與文化學(xué)系;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B222

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 陳慶飛;雷怡;李紅;;不同概念范疇和特征類(lèi)別對(duì)兒童歸納推理多樣性效應(yīng)的影響[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

2 李吉;;俄語(yǔ)成語(yǔ)的數(shù)字概念范疇[J];吉林省教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

3 高國(guó)翠;高鳳蘭;;俄語(yǔ)詞匯概念范疇劃分的聯(lián)想測(cè)試研究[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2012年04期

4 鄭鴻芹;;翻譯原則、策略、方法與技巧的概念范疇及其關(guān)聯(lián)性[J];阿壩師范高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

5 李亮光;;說(shuō)說(shuō)“靈商”與“屬靈智慧”[J];天風(fēng);2014年07期

6 段士秀;;俄漢成語(yǔ)的數(shù)字概念范疇對(duì)比[J];通化師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年11期

7 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 任秀玲;積極開(kāi)展中醫(yī)理論概念范疇研究[N];中國(guó)中醫(yī)藥報(bào);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1695024