本文選題：全喉切除術(shù) + 線型閉合器　； 參考：《廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:比較喉癌全喉切除術(shù)中線性閉合器和手工縫合關(guān)閉咽腔的療效。方法:回顧性收集2014.12-2017.03在我院行全喉切除術(shù)中使用線型閉合器關(guān)閉咽腔共23例,其中使用密閉式技術(shù)17例,開放式技術(shù)6例。同時收集同術(shù)者于2010.01-2014.12月在我院行全喉切除術(shù)手工縫合咽腔23例(對照組)。對比分析兩種方法的一般資料、手術(shù)時間、咽瘺發(fā)生率、經(jīng)口進(jìn)食時間、術(shù)后至出院時間及術(shù)后除咽瘺外并發(fā)癥的差異,探討線型閉合器的臨床效果。結(jié)果:閉合器的密閉式技術(shù)組與手工組相比能夠明顯縮短手術(shù)時間,平均縮短141.12分鐘;縮短術(shù)后經(jīng)口進(jìn)食時間(4.42天)以及術(shù)后至出院時間(4.75天)。閉合器的開放式技術(shù)與手工組相比明顯可以縮短手術(shù)時間,但術(shù)后經(jīng)口進(jìn)食時間、術(shù)后住院時間及咽瘺發(fā)生率沒有差異。密閉式技術(shù)組沒有咽瘺發(fā)生,但與對照組相比(26.09%),P=0.0660.05,統(tǒng)計學(xué)無顯著差異。閉合器組并不增加除咽瘺外其他并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率。結(jié)論:在喉惡性腫瘤全喉切除術(shù)中使用線型閉合器的密閉式技術(shù)關(guān)閉咽腔優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)手工縫合技術(shù)。
[Abstract]:Objective: To compare the efficacy of linear closure and manual suture in laryngectomy for closing the pharyngeal cavity. Methods: a total of 23 cases of 2014.12-2017.03 were collected in our hospital for closing the pharynx with a linear closure device, including 17 cases of closed technique and 6 open technique. At the same time, the same operator was collected at 2010.01-2014.12 month in my hospital. 23 cases (control group) were sutured by total laryngectomy. The general data of the two methods, the time of operation, the incidence of pharynx fistula, the time of oral feeding, the time after the operation and the difference of the postoperative complications after the operation of the pharynx fistula were discussed. Results: the closed technique group was compared with the manual group. It could shorten the operation time, shorten the average time of 141.12 minutes, shorten the time of eating after the operation (4.42 days) and after the operation to discharge time (4.75 days). The open technique of the closed device can shorten the operation time obviously compared with the manual group, but the time of eating after the operation, the time of hospitalization after the operation and the incidence of pharynx fistula are not different. There was no fistula in the operation group, but there was no significant difference between the control group (26.09%) and P=0.0660.05. The closure group did not increase the incidence of other complications except for the pharyngopharynx fistula. Conclusion: the closed closure technique of the linear closure in the laryngectomy for laryngeal malignant tumor is superior to the traditional manual suture technique.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R739.65

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 王亮;王衛(wèi)衛(wèi);婁衛(wèi)華;;吻合器全喉切除術(shù)與傳統(tǒng)方法全喉切除術(shù)的臨床對比觀察[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科雜志;2015年11期

2 林建英;楊熙鴻;郭海鵬;陳偉正;彭漢偉;;閉合器和手工縫合在喉癌切除術(shù)后喉咽關(guān)閉中的比較[J];中國耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科;2015年01期

3 魏小棟;;食管癌手術(shù)中吻合器的臨床應(yīng)用研究進(jìn)展[J];湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2013年04期

4 陳凜;邊識博;;胃腸外科吻合器應(yīng)用相關(guān)并發(fā)癥及其處理[J];中國實用外科雜志;2013年04期

5 胡晶;沈金芳;吳斌;;惡性腫瘤手術(shù)患者全身麻醉的最小成本分析[J];中國藥房;2012年34期

6 劉學(xué)奎;李浩;劉巍巍;李秋梨;李銓;張欣睿;張星;郭朱明;曾宗淵;;線型閉合器在喉全切除術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];中華耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科雜志;2012年07期

7 李繼翔;李健寧;甄亞男;;我國中下段直腸癌雙吻合器吻合術(shù)后并發(fā)癥薈萃分析[J];腫瘤基礎(chǔ)與臨床;2010年01期

8 朱立新,汪廣平;全喉切除術(shù)后并發(fā)咽瘺的相關(guān)因素分析與防治[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉科雜志;1993年03期

，

本文編號：2105362