本文選題：特種部隊(duì) + 新兵��； 參考：《泰山醫(yī)學(xué)院》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 目的 自90年代以來(lái),隨著我國(guó)對(duì)軍事訓(xùn)練傷的重視程度日漸提高,對(duì)軍事訓(xùn)練傷的預(yù)防工作也逐漸受到人們重視。軍事訓(xùn)練傷不僅損害戰(zhàn)士的身體健康,而且對(duì)訓(xùn)練成績(jī)的提高和軍隊(duì)軍事計(jì)劃的實(shí)施也帶來(lái)嚴(yán)重影響。因此,探索軍事訓(xùn)練中運(yùn)動(dòng)損傷的發(fā)生特點(diǎn)和規(guī)律,分析其發(fā)生的原因,提出有效的預(yù)防措施,最大限度地避免或減少軍事訓(xùn)練傷的發(fā)生,對(duì)于提高訓(xùn)練成績(jī),減少訓(xùn)練傷的發(fā)生,順利完成制定的訓(xùn)練計(jì)劃有著重要意義。 方法 本課題分別采用問(wèn)卷調(diào)查、現(xiàn)場(chǎng)體檢、全程跟蹤訓(xùn)練等方法,對(duì)某特種部隊(duì)07年入伍新兵345人,集訓(xùn)期間3個(gè)月發(fā)生的訓(xùn)練損傷相關(guān)因素以及影響訓(xùn)練的相關(guān)因素進(jìn)行了研究,并對(duì)收集的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理,將所有訓(xùn)練傷危險(xiǎn)因素?cái)?shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行匯總、量化、賦值。對(duì)各指標(biāo)間進(jìn)行卡方檢驗(yàn)和T檢驗(yàn),P0.05為有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。對(duì)損傷情況進(jìn)行單因素分析,P0.05為有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。對(duì)新兵有無(wú)訓(xùn)練損傷與其他指標(biāo)進(jìn)行多元線(xiàn)性回歸分析,P 0.05為有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。對(duì)新兵有無(wú)訓(xùn)練損傷與其他指標(biāo)進(jìn)行l(wèi)ogistic回歸分析,分析結(jié)果P0.05為有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。新兵損傷情況與其他指標(biāo)進(jìn)行多元線(xiàn)性回歸分析,P 0.05為有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。 結(jié)果 在本研究中,訓(xùn)練傷發(fā)生率為29.3%。實(shí)驗(yàn)組為未損傷組共244人,對(duì)照組為損傷組共101人,兩組組間進(jìn)行比較,身高t=2.392,P =0.0180.05,有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,說(shuō)明身高與訓(xùn)練傷有關(guān),身高較高者容易發(fā)生損傷。下肢長(zhǎng)(t=2.084 , P=0.0390.05) ,小腿長(zhǎng)(t=2.144 , P=0.0340.05) ,小腿加足高(t=1.977,P =0.05),有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,可以認(rèn)為下肢長(zhǎng)、小腿長(zhǎng)、小腿加足高值較大者容易發(fā)生損傷。肩寬(t=2.003,P =0.0470.05),有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,可以認(rèn)為肩寬較小者容易發(fā)生損傷。訓(xùn)練傷發(fā)生率經(jīng)卡方檢驗(yàn)得出(x2=59.272,P =0.0000.05),有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,可以認(rèn)為在集訓(xùn)期間,未損傷的發(fā)生率要比發(fā)生損傷的發(fā)生率要高。損傷情況的分布經(jīng)卡方檢驗(yàn)得出(x2=52.762,P=0.0000.05),有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,可以認(rèn)為部隊(duì)在訓(xùn)練中,急性損傷占訓(xùn)練傷的主要部分。在損傷或疼痛部位分布調(diào)查中,經(jīng)卡方檢驗(yàn)得出(x2=18.881,P=0.0000.05),有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,可以認(rèn)為損傷所發(fā)生各個(gè)部位間有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異,膝關(guān)節(jié)以下最易發(fā)生損傷,其次為四肢。肩寬比身高(t=2.674,P=0.00890.05),有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,可以認(rèn)為肩寬比身高值較小者容易引起損傷。在損傷性質(zhì)的調(diào)查中,經(jīng)卡方檢驗(yàn)得出(x2=25.752,P =0.0000.05),有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,可以認(rèn)為軟組織損傷占所有損傷的主要部分。在損傷原因的調(diào)查中,經(jīng)卡方檢驗(yàn)得出(x2=143.030,P=0.0000.05),有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,可以認(rèn)為訓(xùn)練傷的主要原因?yàn)橛?xùn)練過(guò)多或負(fù)荷過(guò)大。在損傷后的癥狀及功能分布的調(diào)查中,經(jīng)卡方檢驗(yàn)得出(x2=239.634,P=0.0000.05),有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,可以認(rèn)為損傷后,主要癥狀為疼痛,在同一水平上使訓(xùn)練成績(jī)下降。在對(duì)發(fā)生損傷的訓(xùn)練科目的調(diào)查中,經(jīng)卡方檢驗(yàn)得出(x2=55.000,P=0.0000.05),有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,可以認(rèn)為發(fā)生訓(xùn)練傷的主要科目為三公里、五公里、百米,其次為投彈、單雙杠、俯臥撐。 損傷情況與其他指標(biāo)的多元線(xiàn)性逐步回歸分析結(jié)果:身高(t=3.6871, P=0.0003,b=0.1975)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化回歸系數(shù)絕對(duì)值最大且為正相關(guān),對(duì)損傷情況的影響最大,其次為腰圍(t=-1.8995, P=0.0583,b=-0.1030)。有無(wú)損傷與其他指標(biāo)的多元線(xiàn)性回歸分析結(jié)果:各項(xiàng)因素中,腰圍為負(fù)相關(guān)( t=-2.4577, P=0.0145,b=-0.1971 )和肩寬比身高為負(fù)相關(guān)(t=-2.7387, P=0.0065,b=-0.1493),兩者的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化回歸系數(shù)絕對(duì)值較大,對(duì)有無(wú)損傷有比較大的影響。其它的相關(guān)因素還有:入伍前沒(méi)有受過(guò)四肢及腰背部損傷、下肢力線(xiàn)異常、下肢長(zhǎng)、胸圍。有無(wú)損傷與其他指標(biāo)的Logitic回歸分析結(jié)果:下肢長(zhǎng)(OR=1.062,OR95%CI:1.001,1.127)和下肢力線(xiàn)異常(OR=1.007,OR95%CI:1.001,1.022)兩者的OR值1,為危險(xiǎn)性因素。腰圍(OR=0.914,OR95%CI:0.852,0.981)、入伍前沒(méi)有受過(guò)四肢及腰背部損傷(OR=0.450,95%CI:0.216,0.939)兩者的OR值1為保護(hù)性因素。
[Abstract]:objective
Since 90s, with the increasing attention to military training injuries in China, the prevention of military training injuries has been gradually paid attention to. Military training injuries not only damage the health of the soldiers, but also have a serious impact on the improvement of training results and the implementation of military military plans. It is of great significance to improve the performance of training, reduce the occurrence of training injury, and successfully complete the training plan, to avoid or reduce the occurrence of military training injury to the maximum extent.
Method
The subjects were investigated by questionnaire, on-site physical examination and whole course tracking training, including 345 recruits for 07 years in a special unit, related factors of training injury and related factors affecting training during the 3 months of training, and the related data were statistically processed to train all the risk factors for training injuries. The data were collected, quantified and assigned. With the chi square test and T test among the indexes, the P0.05 was statistically significant. The single factor analysis of the damage was carried out, and the P0.05 was statistically significant. The multiple linear regression analysis of the recruits had no training injury and other indexes, and the P 0.05 was statistically significant. There was no training damage to the recruits and the new recruits. Other indexes were analyzed by logistic regression analysis, and the results of P0.05 were statistically significant. The injury of recruits and other indexes were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis, and P 0.05 was statistically significant.
Result
In this study, the incidence of training injury was 244 in the 29.3%. experimental group and 101 in the control group. The two groups were compared, the height t=2.392 and P =0.0180.05 were statistically significant, indicating that the height was associated with the training injury and the height of the lower limbs (t=2.084, P=0.0390.05), and the leg length (t=2.144, P). =0.0340.05), the leg plus the foot high (t=1.977, P =0.05), has statistical significance, can be considered the lower limbs long, the leg length, the leg plus the high value is easy to damage. Shoulder width (t=2.003, P =0.0470.05), there are statistical significance, can be considered as small shoulder width Rong Yifa injury. Training injury incidence (x2=59.272, P =0.0000.05) It is statistically significant that the incidence of uninjured is higher than that of injury during the training period. The distribution of the damage is statistically significant by the chi square test (x2=52.762, P=0.0000.05). It can be considered that in the training, the acute injury accounts for the main part of the training injury. According to the chi square test (x2=18.881, P=0.0000.05), it is statistically significant that there is a statistically significant difference between the various parts of the injury, the most easily damaged below the knee joint, the second is the limbs. The shoulder width is more than the height (t=2.674, P=0.00890.05), which is statistically significant, and it can be considered that the shoulder width is easier to cause damage than those with the smaller height. In the investigation of the nature of injury, x2=25.752 (P =0.0000.05) was found to be statistically significant. It was considered that the injury of the soft tissue was the main part of all the injuries. In the investigation of the cause of injury, the chi square test showed (x2=143.030, P=0.0000.05) that there were statistical significance, and the main reason for the training injury was too much training or negative training. In the investigation of the symptoms and function distribution after injury, the chi square test concluded that (x2=239.634, P=0.0000.05) was statistically significant, and that the main symptom was pain after the injury, and the training results were reduced at the same level. In the investigation of the injury training purpose, the chi square test obtained (x2=55.000, P=0.0000.05), Statistically significant, it can be considered that the main subjects of training injuries were three km, five km, 100 m, followed by throwing bombs, single parallel bars and push ups.
The results of multiple linear stepwise regression analysis of damage and other indexes: the absolute value of the normalized regression coefficient of height (t=3.6871, P=0.0003, b=0.1975) was the largest and positive correlation, the greatest impact on the damage situation, followed by the waist circumference (t=-1.8995, P=0.0583, b=-0.1030). The results of multiple linear regression analysis with no damage and other indexes were the results of the multiple linear regression analysis. The negative correlation (t=-2.4577, P=0.0145, b=-0.1971) and shoulder width were negatively correlated with the height of the shoulder (t=-2.7387, P=0.0065, b=-0.1493) in the item factors. The absolute value of the normalized regression coefficient was larger, which had a greater impact on whether there was no injury. The Logitic regression analysis of the lower extremity (OR=1.062, OR95%CI:1.001,1.127) and the lower limb force line (OR=1.007, OR95%CI:1.001,1.022) was 1, which was a risk factor. The waist circumference (OR=0.914, OR95%CI: 0.852,0.981) had no injuries to the limbs and the waist and back (OR=0.450,95%CI, OR=0.450,95%CI). 0.216,0.939) the OR value 1 of both is a protective factor.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：泰山醫(yī)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R82

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陶偉;;特種部隊(duì)單兵攜行藥材初探[J];海軍醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2011年04期

2 馮杰;郎森陽(yáng);牛晟;楊君;王娟;張川敏;孔巧;丁偉艷;;我軍部分新兵自我效能現(xiàn)狀分析[J];解放軍預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2011年04期

3 祁向麗;楊林;任立松;高晶;李彩霞;鄭玉建;;駐烏某部新兵營(yíng)養(yǎng)食品衛(wèi)生知識(shí)調(diào)查[J];解放軍預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2011年04期

4 曲延峰;李翔;;不同籍貫新兵寒區(qū)發(fā)病情況的調(diào)查[J];解放軍護(hù)理雜志;2011年15期

5 姜昌龍;陳琪;趙郁;;某部新兵一起水痘暴發(fā)疫情流行病學(xué)調(diào)查分析[J];中華醫(yī)院感染學(xué)雜志;2011年12期

6 沈玉美;張秀梅;戴榕娟;周燕平;;新兵跑步考核前后目標(biāo)追蹤能力的變化[J];東南國(guó)防醫(yī)藥;2011年04期

7 劉安毅;陳聰路;楊建新;聶歲鋒;戴良;李澤;王旭東;;某特種部隊(duì)特種技術(shù)訓(xùn)練致訓(xùn)練傷診治分析[J];海軍醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2011年04期

8 郭靜利;李云波;郝永建;陶濤;;某部2010年度新兵人格特征及心理健康狀況調(diào)查[J];解放軍預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2011年04期

9 陳海鷹;;小島之宴[J];食品與健康;1999年11期

10 胡厚澤;史連勝;何成講;朱敏;;高原新兵復(fù)檢心電圖短P-R間期及心率變化分析[J];西南國(guó)防醫(yī)藥;2011年08期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 申西林;;2002年昆明地區(qū)839名新兵皮膚病調(diào)查報(bào)告[A];2003中國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合皮膚性病學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2003年

2 張麗萱;艾旭;陳春杰;劉東;;新兵心理健康狀況調(diào)查與分析[A];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)第四屆學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文匯編[C];2003年

3 李曉一;邢葆平;馮斌;;消防部隊(duì)基層新兵焦慮情緒的自我管理[A];2011年浙江省心身醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2011年

4 張翠英;朱琳;周曉青;薛建利;李偉霞;張敬娟;;1978—1999年新兵結(jié)核感染率調(diào)查(摘要)[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第六屆全國(guó)結(jié)核病學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文匯編[C];2000年

5 張樂(lè)之;郭峰;程靈芝;劉曉紅;李川云;鄧光輝;;心理應(yīng)激對(duì)不同焦慮特質(zhì)新兵紅細(xì)胞免疫黏附功能的影響[A];第三屆全國(guó)血液免疫學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文集[C];2003年

6 周志超;;送新兵上前線(xiàn)[A];老兵話(huà)當(dāng)年（第五輯）[C];2004年

7 李紅政;李雪榮;;集訓(xùn)新兵軀體化癥狀特點(diǎn)及其相關(guān)因素分析[A];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)第四屆學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文匯編[C];2003年

8 陳耀明;杜可軍;鄭剛;駱文靜;陳景元;康明田;李軍;;某寒區(qū)野戰(zhàn)部隊(duì)新兵的膳食調(diào)查與分析[A];中國(guó)營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)會(huì)特殊營(yíng)養(yǎng)第七屆學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議會(huì)議資料匯編[C];2009年

9 宋新國(guó);喬富勝;苗丹民;;新兵心理素質(zhì)與教育疏導(dǎo)對(duì)策研究[A];第十一屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2007年

10 徐江濤;華滿(mǎn)堂;谷永江;宋永斌;張曉馨;梁曉慧;;新兵在寒區(qū)集訓(xùn)期間的睡眠質(zhì)量特點(diǎn)[A];2008年中國(guó)睡眠研究會(huì)第五屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文摘要匯編[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 荊晶;反恐吃緊，，美特種部隊(duì)士兵卻跳槽成風(fēng)[N];新華每日電訊;2004年

2 毛亞輝 凌志明;新兵啟程前三忌[N];中國(guó)國(guó)防報(bào);2004年

3 天籟;揭秘：俄打造特種部隊(duì)"王中王"[N];中國(guó)國(guó)防報(bào);2005年

4 楊百奇　李治民;帶新兵秘訣[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

5 王武邦 張匯濤;帶新兵上哨注意什么[N];人民武警;2003年

6 王強(qiáng);怎樣使新兵盡快實(shí)現(xiàn)“角色”轉(zhuǎn)換[N];人民武警;2003年

7 劉慶全 吳小松;北京總隊(duì)十六支隊(duì) 新兵參與訓(xùn)練事務(wù)[N];人民武警;2004年

8 張紅興;在提高新兵執(zhí)勤能力上用足勁[N];人民武警;2005年

9 本報(bào)專(zhuān)稿 張永崗;美軍特種部隊(duì)?wèi)?zhàn)力透視[N];世界報(bào);2005年

10 溫恒遠(yuǎn) 孟令宇;做好新兵思想政治工作[N];中國(guó)黃金報(bào);2002年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李紅政;陸軍新兵心理狀況與生活事件相關(guān)研究[D];中南大學(xué);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王永波;某部隊(duì)新兵政審調(diào)查統(tǒng)計(jì)系統(tǒng)的設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

2 程靈芝;急性軍事應(yīng)激及心理訓(xùn)練對(duì)新兵免疫功能的影響研究[D];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2004年

3 吳遷;國(guó)家軍用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)《新兵衛(wèi)生防疫規(guī)范》的研究[D];第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2002年

4 薛剛;不同體能訓(xùn)練模式對(duì)新兵屈伸膝肌功能影響的等速測(cè)試研究[D];第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2001年

5 粟文彬;新兵基礎(chǔ)訓(xùn)練前后心理健康狀況的變化及其與訓(xùn)練傷的關(guān)系[D];第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2002年

6 李雙利;新兵自我和諧性及其影響因素的研究[D];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué);2007年

7 張軍勝;新兵心理健康狀況和人格特征的相關(guān)研究[D];第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2007年

8 李文進(jìn);某特種部隊(duì)新兵下肢軍事訓(xùn)練傷的研究[D];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2007年

9 劉彩誼;特殊作業(yè)環(huán)境下軍人心理衛(wèi)生狀況調(diào)查及心理行為干預(yù)措施研究[D];中國(guó)人民解放軍軍醫(yī)進(jìn)修學(xué)院;2003年

10 郝建武;基于模糊推理及數(shù)據(jù)挖掘的新兵政治思想工作指導(dǎo)專(zhuān)家系統(tǒng)[D];太原理工大學(xué);2002年

本文編號(hào)：1880079